Author Topic: MiG-19, chinese versions and Fantan  (Read 5608 times)

Offline ysi_maniac

  • I will die understanding not this world
Re: MiG-19, chinese versions and Fantan
« Reply #15 on: October 26, 2015, 05:03:53 AM »


Parallel I-1 instead of the SM becoming MiG-19/J-6 and basis for Q-5.  This one has a big centrifugal flow turbojet as opposed to two smaller axial flow ones.

I have not gotten around incorporating the fin root drag chute compartment on this one.


That is good looking


AGREED!!

Offline ysi_maniac

  • I will die understanding not this world
Re: MiG-19, chinese versions and Fantan
« Reply #16 on: October 26, 2015, 05:04:42 AM »
Delta Farmer


Offline Daryl J.

  • Assures us he rarely uses model glue in dentistry
Re: MiG-19, chinese versions and Fantan
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2017, 12:41:15 AM »
White over NMF
Skis

Simple, but given its shape, an interesting machine to view.
As to who would use it?  Hu knows?!
kwyxdxLg5T

Offline dy031101

  • Yuri Fanboy and making cute stuff practical- at least that's the plan anyway
  • Prefers Guns And Tanks Over Swords And Magic
Re: MiG-19, chinese versions and Fantan
« Reply #18 on: January 11, 2019, 12:52:35 AM »
I learned from the first DCS World Newsletter of 2019 that a module for the MiG-19P is in development.

On the what-if front...... a Super-6 or J-6FS along the same line as the F-100BI?

Middle: Wingtip SRAAM carriage exclusive to the J-6III, the definitive high-speed day fighter derivative of Shenyang J-6.

Bottom: A even-simpler (modelling-wise) what-if...... PL-8 WVRAAM.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2019, 04:14:14 AM by dy031101 »
Forget about his bow and arrows- why wait until that sparrow has done his deed when I can just bury him right now 'cause I'm sick and tired of hearing why he wants to have his way with the cock robin!?

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: MiG-19, chinese versions and Fantan
« Reply #19 on: January 12, 2019, 01:03:49 PM »
Perhaps a cross between the Ye-8 and the SM-12M or a suitable J-6 variant and the J-7FS?