Author Topic: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft  (Read 294780 times)

Offline Doom!

  • Slayer of pixels and plastic!
  • Glad to be here!
    • Doom Island 2
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #150 on: September 12, 2012, 11:09:38 PM »
Stephane, I honestly didn't see the previous 4 until you mentioned them, being as how they were on a separate page. I enjoy your work quite a bit but don't always get a chance to comment.
Doom!
Jeff G.

Offline Dr. YoKai

  • Was in High School when mastadons roamed the plains...
  • A notorious curmudgeon who is partial to...hemp!
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #151 on: September 14, 2012, 01:45:17 AM »
 Your work continues to amaze, Stephane-I'm not a big fan of the Mustang, but the twin variation
 you recently did is really striking.

Offline finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #152 on: September 14, 2012, 12:08:31 PM »
A-51:  brilliant work, so real looking, love it    :-*

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #153 on: September 17, 2012, 09:28:47 AM »
Recent works for your enjoyment (hopefully...):










The first of these looks so natural and quite aesthetically pleasing.  As to the second, are we really ready for a "stealth airliner"?  That greatly resembles a scaled-up Tacit Blue with a few tweaks for more conventional appearances.

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #154 on: September 17, 2012, 09:35:13 AM »



[/quote]

The first of these looks so natural and quite aesthetically pleasing.  As to the second, are we really ready for a "stealth airliner"?  That greatly resembles a scaled-up Tacit Blue with a few tweaks for more conventional appearances.
[/quote]

Given the nose shape, a Shamu paint scheme would seem appropriate.   ;D
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #155 on: September 17, 2012, 09:35:32 AM »
are we really ready for a "stealth airliner"?  That greatly resembles a scaled-up Tacit Blue with a few tweaks for more conventional appearances.

Actually not. It's the Teledyne Ryan BQM-145A UAV (see attachments in related post for original photo).

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #156 on: September 17, 2012, 10:11:46 AM »
are we really ready for a "stealth airliner"?  That greatly resembles a scaled-up Tacit Blue with a few tweaks for more conventional appearances.

Actually not. It's the Teledyne Ryan BQM-145A UAV (see attachments in related post for original photo).
Hmm, convergent concepts.  A lot of it does look like Tacit Blue.  I wonder if it was something in the water in SoCal during that time?

Offline apophenia

  • Perversely enjoys removing backgrounds.
  • Patterns? What patterns?
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #157 on: September 19, 2012, 05:12:07 AM »
Stéphane: I haven't been around for a while but I love your Arsenal VB.210! I'm a sucker for most things Arsenal but a twin VB.10 is pure genius.

The RW has just fallen short in providing us with enough  four-engined fighter aircraft!
"Rumble thee forth to the land of the unbelieving scum on the other side
'cuz they don't go for what's in the Book and that makes 'em BAD!"

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #158 on: September 30, 2012, 03:16:53 AM »
As usual, I'm grateful for all your comments, folks!

Haven't got round to doing the A-51 three-view, but I definitely will. Meanwhile, here's a project I started a few months ago and forgot about...

The Lockheed XO-3D « Sirius » was an experimental development of the YO-3A « Quiet Star » with two staggered wings connected at the tips, enlarged rudder, and three-place cockpit...



Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #159 on: September 30, 2012, 08:55:49 AM »
Finally, the 4-view plan of the North American A-51 Stallion is here. Took me a while but I think it was worth it, especially since many of you seem to have enjoyed in photo-edition form.

This should serve as a good base for those who are tempted to model it in plastic.

Please note that:
  • The nose gear is adaptated from a P-38 Lightning.
  • The main gear was modified a bit, with the wheel moved slightly back.
  • Tail wheel was removed.
  • Nose is custom, though inspired in profile view by that of the Martin XB-51.

Feel free if you have any questions, remarks or even positive criticism!

Full-size download (1883 x 1366 pixels) is available by clicking here.


Offline dy031101

  • Yuri Fanboy and making cute stuff practical- at least that's the plan anyway
  • Prefers Guns And Tanks Over Swords And Magic
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #160 on: September 30, 2012, 08:57:05 AM »
Oh Hell Yeah!  :)
Forget about his bow and arrows- why wait until that sparrow has done his deed when I can just bury him right now 'cause I'm sick and tired of hearing why he wants to have his way with the cock robin!?

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #161 on: September 30, 2012, 09:12:30 AM »
Luv it. Maybe the fate of one my stashed F-82s.  :)

The nose looks like it could be build from the proboscises of a P-38 and P-80.

Did you bend in the wing tips?
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #162 on: September 30, 2012, 09:58:11 AM »
Did you bend in the wing tips?

I didn't actually. But since I used elements from the P-82B and others from the P-82E, it just so happens that the wings are from the latter, and shaped differently... Consider this the "A-51" production version instead of the YA-51 of the photo...  ;)

Offline Logan Hartke

  • High priest in the black arts of profiling...
  • Rivet-counting whiffer
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #163 on: September 30, 2012, 09:59:19 AM »
Gorgeous 3 view of the Stallion!

Cheers,

Logan

Offline apophenia

  • Perversely enjoys removing backgrounds.
  • Patterns? What patterns?
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #164 on: October 01, 2012, 10:34:48 AM »
That tandem-wing Quiet Star is inspired!  :)
"Rumble thee forth to the land of the unbelieving scum on the other side
'cuz they don't go for what's in the Book and that makes 'em BAD!"

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft: Pilatus J-1 « Drachen »
« Reply #165 on: October 01, 2012, 05:39:47 PM »
Thanks a lot, folks! Glad you've enjoyed the Stallion plan!

And now the Pilatus J-1 Drachen, a Swiss jet fighter from the post-war years.



Can you found out what aircraft I used as a basis?

Offline tsrjoe

  • Has been volunteered... for something...
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #166 on: October 01, 2012, 06:31:53 PM »
really sweet, first time iv seen a derived 'operational' Boulton paul P.111/120  8) funny it does look like something the Swiss would have designed in the late 50's prior to the Arbalete, Aguilon, etc

i just love that NA. Stallion, just wondering who will be first to reproduce it in plastic  :D

cherrs, Joe

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #167 on: October 01, 2012, 06:38:55 PM »
really sweet, first time iv seen a derived 'operational' Boulton paul P.111/120  8)

Good guess! Though I stretched it quite a bit...

funny it does look like something the Swiss would have designed in the late 50's prior to the Arbalete, Aguilon, etc

Thanks, I really take it as a compliment.

i just love that NA. Stallion, just wondering who will be first to reproduce it in plastic  :D

Can't wait to see someone do THAT!!!  :))

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #168 on: October 02, 2012, 12:13:50 AM »
Interesting dragon, while I prefer sharp noses (would you do a version with lateral intakes?)

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #169 on: October 02, 2012, 04:30:19 AM »
Tophe, that would be the J-2 I guess... I might give it a go...

Meanwhile, here is a special how-to that not only shows you what aircraft I used as a basis, but also how easy it is to completely change an aircraft's change with minimum effort (well, sometimes at least!).

Hope you enjoy it!


Offline tsrjoe

  • Has been volunteered... for something...
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #170 on: October 02, 2012, 06:20:40 AM »
waw im in awe, having tried tweaking an image pixel by pixel im truly impressed at the talents of those that make it 'look' easy (as i know its a lot harder than it looks !)  8)

cheers, Joe

Offline apophenia

  • Perversely enjoys removing backgrounds.
  • Patterns? What patterns?
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #171 on: October 02, 2012, 07:52:23 AM »
Ack! He's giving away the trade secrets  :o

Nice job on the step-by-step Stéphane  :)
"Rumble thee forth to the land of the unbelieving scum on the other side
'cuz they don't go for what's in the Book and that makes 'em BAD!"

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #172 on: October 02, 2012, 11:50:14 AM »
Tophe, that would be the J-2 I guess... I might give it a go...
This is not a requirement. Just in case you run out of ideas... someday.
For the step by step lesson, I am amazed, how do you elongate/lengthen a fuselage without turning blurred?

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #173 on: October 02, 2012, 04:11:46 PM »
how do you elongate/lengthen a fuselage without turning blurred?

When you resize an picture in Paint Shop Pro (and I believe in other software too) there is a choice between bilinear, bicubic or intelligent resize. Intelligent resize is best, it smoothens the contours and gives a more natural feel. When it's done, you can apply the "sharpen" filter to make the picture, well... sharper.

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #174 on: October 02, 2012, 11:52:20 PM »
Thanks for the explanation! Corel Paint Shop Pro seems to have turned better than my Corel Photo Paint 6...