Author Topic: Miles Aircraft ...  (Read 8001 times)

Offline jcf

  • Global Moderator
  • Turn that Gila-copter down!
Miles Aircraft ...
« on: March 06, 2014, 05:22:54 AM »
No thread for Miles, so here goes ...

The Miles M.22.


Flitzer's thread with colour profile of M.22 and other projects.
http://beyondthesprues.com/Forum/index.php?topic=664.msg5674#msg5674

“Conspiracy theory’s got to be simple.
Sense doesn’t come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated shit
actually is than they ever are about
whatever’s supposed to be behind the
conspiracy.”
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

Offline jcf

  • Global Moderator
  • Turn that Gila-copter down!
Re: Miles Aircraft ...
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2014, 05:32:39 AM »
Miles M.22A



M.22A
During the latter part of 1940 the Ministry issued specification F. 18/40,
calling for a high-altitude fighter for use both by day and night and based
on the use of the Rolls-Royce Merlin RM.6SM engine which was shortly to
become available. The requirements, both as regards performance and
armament, were very different from those envisaged for the M.22 and,
accordingly, the M.22A project was prepared to comply with the specification.
This provided for a rather larger aeroplane comparable in size with the
D.H.98 Mosquito, with a duration of 4-6 hours as against the two hours of
the M.22, and armed with four 20 mm cannon instead of ten Browning
guns. Like the Mosquito, the M.22A was to be of all-wood construction with
a one-piece wing and with a pressurized cabin, the crew being seated in
tandem. The cannon were mounted against the sides of the fuselage and
the Rolls-Royce Merlin engines were enclosed in narrow nacelles of low
frontal area, the ducted radiators being mounted in the wing. A retractable
tailwheel undercarriage was fitted, double mainwheels being provided. An
alternative version provided for a four-gun Boulton Paul turret. When used
as a night fighter, the proposed modus operandi was for the rear pilot to
take-off, operate the AI and bring the aircraft within range of the enemy.
At this juncture the forward pilot would take over, conduct the attack, fly
the aircraft back to base and land it. The M.22A was never ordered nor built.

- Miles Aircraft since 1925, Don L. Brown, Putnam 1970

More types to come.  :)
“Conspiracy theory’s got to be simple.
Sense doesn’t come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated shit
actually is than they ever are about
whatever’s supposed to be behind the
conspiracy.”
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

Offline jcf

  • Global Moderator
  • Turn that Gila-copter down!
Re: Miles Aircraft ...
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2014, 06:21:13 AM »




M.23 Fighter Projects
In 1941 a proposal was submitted to the Ministry of Aircraft Production
for a high-speed single-seat fighter powered initially by a Rolls-Royce
Merlin engine, then in full production, and later by a more powerful
Rolls-Royce Griffon as soon as it became available. The aircraft was of
wood construction with the exception of the wing spars, which were of
metal. It was fitted with a reversed tricycle undercarriage, the rear unit
of which was provided with two positions, giving either a horizontal or a
taildown attitude to the fuselage. The main undercarriage units folded
inwards into the wings, giving a wide track.
In order to reduce frontal area, the windscreen and canopy were very
low indeed. To enable the pilot to have adequate view for take-off and
landing, he could raise his seat, the top of the canopy hinging up to form
a windscreen as in the Master. The wing was of elliptical planform, the
root thickness being 0.2c. Armament consisted of eight .303 Browning
guns together with 500 rounds of ammunition per gun instead of the 300
provided on contemporary fighters. Alternatively, two 20 mm Hispano-
Suiza cannon could be fitted. The wing area was substantially less than on
existing fighters, being only 185 sq ft as compared with 242 on the Spitfire
and 258 on the Hurricane, and the wing loading was accordingly higher.
The M.23 was not ordered, possibly because it was of wooden construction
and possibly because the Ministry did not believe that, even with
a Griffon engine, a speed of 470 mph would be attainable with a 20 per
cent thick wing.

- Miles Aircraft since 1925, Don L. Brown, Putnam 1970
“Conspiracy theory’s got to be simple.
Sense doesn’t come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated shit
actually is than they ever are about
whatever’s supposed to be behind the
conspiracy.”
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

Offline jcf

  • Global Moderator
  • Turn that Gila-copter down!
Re: Miles Aircraft ...
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2014, 06:36:51 AM »




M.23A
In 1942 existing fighters were finding difficulty in reaching the high altitude
at which the Junkers-Ju 86s were operating. As a temporary expedient,
two modifications of the Spitfire V were put in hand. The first was an
extension to the wingtips, thus increasing the aspect ratio with a corresponding
decrease in induced drag especially at low indicated air speeds,
and consequent increase in ceiling. This variant was known as the Spitfire
VII. The other was the use of a more powerful version of the Merlin
engine, installed in the Spitfire IX.
It was felt, however, that a pressurized high-altitude fighter should be
put in hand as quickly as possible. The author prepared a project design,
the M.23A, using the then new Rolls-Royce Merlin 60 engine which had -
a greatly increased rated height. The ducted radiators were mounted in
the wing, inboard of the cannon, and the armament consisted of two
20 mm cannon with 60 rounds of shells per cannon. In addition, extra
fuel was carried in jettisonable tanks, thus increasing the operational
range without impairing the high-altitude performance. On account of
the very high aspect ratio employed, the span loading was very much
better than that of the Spitfire or even than the Westland Welkin, a twin
engined fighter designed specifically for high-altitude operation. The
M.23A was the first Miles project with a thin high aspect ratio wing, but
it was never ordered.
- Miles Aircraft since 1925, Don L. Brown, Putnam 1970

Reminiscent of a stretched-out, cleaned-up  M.20 to my eye.  ;)
“Conspiracy theory’s got to be simple.
Sense doesn’t come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated shit
actually is than they ever are about
whatever’s supposed to be behind the
conspiracy.”
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

Offline uncle les

  • Aussie Whiffer Extraordinaire!
  • The man behind the models of the same name...
Re: Miles Aircraft ...
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2014, 07:05:00 AM »
Truth stretched slightly ones OK ?

Offline PR19_Kit

  • Likes to brag about how long his...wings are.
  • Made it at last!
Re: Miles Aircraft ...
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2014, 07:09:11 AM »
The M23 looks vaguely familiar somehow.....  :)
Regards
Kit

--------------------------
Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings

Offline jcf

  • Global Moderator
  • Turn that Gila-copter down!
Re: Miles Aircraft ...
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2014, 07:12:21 AM »
Yep.

Hmm, a Me 263/Ju 248 with the biconvex wing of the M.52, low-speed handling would be "interesting".  ;D
“Conspiracy theory’s got to be simple.
Sense doesn’t come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated shit
actually is than they ever are about
whatever’s supposed to be behind the
conspiracy.”
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

Offline arkon

  • Paper Building Maestro
Re: Miles Aircraft ...
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2014, 10:16:31 AM »
they would look great at the air races!
the paper gods demand sacrifice

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Miles Aircraft ...
« Reply #8 on: June 07, 2016, 01:11:22 AM »
To complement the upcoming Miles M.52 book:





From our own RP.1
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...