Beyond The Sprues
Modelling => Ideas & Inspiration => Aero-space => Topic started by: upnorth on February 19, 2012, 09:25:46 PM
-
Hello all:
I notice we don't have one of these types of thread for the Tornado. I think it would actually be a good excercise to see what more could be done with a combat aircraft that's already done a fair bit in the real world, make our brains work a bit more. ;)
I remember several years ago I slapped some USN decals from an F-8 Crusader (VF-2 as I recall) onto the cruddy old 1/72 Monogram Tonado kit, bu otherwise built it from the box.
The thought hit me more recently of what if the Bundesmarine had a carrier force with the Tornado as fleet defence? What sort of mods would be needed to make it a real carrier contender.
Basing my idea on the premise that the Bundesmarine used both the ADV and IDS on their ships, I came up with this list of mods that I think would be common to both:
Beefed up landing gear with towbar on lose leg and lighter tailhook replaced with carrier type.
Thrust reverser system deleted. It would be extra weight and a corrosion trap on carriers.
Folding hinge on tail fin.
Make the radome hinge able to swing through 180 degrees for storage and seal the radome and avionics compartment at this hinge point:
(http://home.vrweb.de/~doerrechristian/Tornado/Istandsetzung/Scannen0003.jpg)
net photo
It did strike me to think of it as a joint project with Grumman. If I look at the similarities between the main landing gear on the Tornado and on the A-6 Intruder, I could see Panavia turning to a proven hand in carrier aircraft to get things like that right. There some aspects of the Intruder gear that I think could be adapted to the Tornado's for strengthening.
Considering the range of weaponry and missions the Tornado can adapt to, having a carrier capable variation on the family would certainly be attractive if it's creator nations had conventional carriers.
Now I know very well that I'm not the first to entertain ideas of a navalised Tornado and that the above are just my take on the idea of getting more milage from the design.
What else could be done with the "Fin"?
Looking forward to whatever other ideas might be lurking in other brains.
-
Well, I've always thought of doing an "enhanced" IDS variant with the fuselage extension of the ADV. Another thought would be to look at the enhanced aerodynamics of the Tomcat 21 and see how much of that could be transferred to the ADV to make it more agile. There is a series of novels that came out sometime back about a NATO squadron flying greatly improved ADV's that was later joined by another squadron flying similarly enhanced IDS's; these had to have come out in the 1980s or early 1990s as the Soviet Union was, in one form or another, the main adversary.
-
The carrier version is a good idea and very credible. I doubt whether we'd have had to go to Grumman for carrier landing gear know-how though, given Britain's long experience with carrier aircraft.
What occured to me some years ago, seeing an article about how ADVs used ALARMs and their enhanced RHAWS kit as SEAD in 2003 in Iraq, was that in a less budget-constrained world, a couple of squadrons of the ADVs could be converted to a proper SEAD aircraft once the Typhoon took over their interceptor role. The way I see it is that the SEAD avionics would fit in place of the radar, with additional black boxes in a conformal "canoe" that hangs from the fuselage hardpoints, blanking off the Skyflash stations, but providing two ALARM pylons on corner stations. There's be an enlarged pod on the fin, and four more ALARMs on the Sidewinder rails (they will fit), with the usual Skyshadow and BOZ pods outboard. Alternately, if the funtions of the latter pods could be done internally, then you could have a pair of ALARMs or ASRAAMs on the outboard pylons and eliminate the gun for more black box space.
-
The carrier version is a good idea and very credible. I doubt whether we'd have had to go to Grumman for carrier landing gear know-how though, given Britain's long experience with carrier aircraft.
What occured to me some years ago, seeing an article about how ADVs used ALARMs and their enhanced RHAWS kit as SEAD in 2003 in Iraq, was that in a less budget-constrained world, a couple of squadrons of the ADVs could be converted to a proper SEAD aircraft once the Typhoon took over their interceptor role. The way I see it is that the SEAD avionics would fit in place of the radar, with additional black boxes in a conformal "canoe" that hangs from the fuselage hardpoints, blanking off the Skyflash stations, but providing two ALARM pylons on corner stations. There's be an enlarged pod on the fin, and four more ALARMs on the Sidewinder rails (they will fit), with the usual Skyshadow and BOZ pods outboard. Alternately, if the funtions of the latter pods could be done internally, then you could have a pair of ALARMs or ASRAAMs on the outboard pylons and eliminate the gun for more black box space.
The SEAD role was a great idea to keep the ADVs going and somehow I think it could have been done without putting too many warts on the outside of the machine.
I talked to an F.3 pilot once about the aircraft in the SEAD role and he said it looked very promissing for the job.
It would be a great WHIFF to do up a Wild Weasle Tornado.
Removing the gun would be logical in any case as the SEAD mission doesn't require it.
As for external warts, I could easily see an enlarged spine for housing more gear. It would be sort of like you see on the F-16 these days.
-
(http://photos.smugmug.com/OLDPB/i-P377Rdt/0/47bd3162/O/USAF_FIN_01.jpg)
:icon_fsm:
-
RAAF Tornados to replace the F-111s in the late '80s/early '90s.
-
Did a total of 28 Tonka profiles including the usual suspects along with one I dubbed the 'FGR.5' which was an ADV baseline with GR systems and USAF Weasels off the GR & ADV baselines.
Regards,
John
-
Did a total of 28 Tonka profiles including the usual suspects along with one I dubbed the 'FGR.5' which was an ADV baseline with GR systems and USAF Weasels off the GR & ADV baselines.
Regards,
John
As I said, I know I'm not the first to meddle with these ides for the Tornado! ;D
I do remember a few of those Tornado profiles you did, John. Some very inspiring stuff.
-
How about posting some of those profiles rather then just talking about them...
-
Over 5000 profiles, it sometimes is difficult to mention everything or, in fact, repost everything.
(http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s101/Maverick65au/Post%20War%20USAF/Tornado18.jpg)
(http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s101/Maverick65au/Post%20War%20USAF/Tornado17.jpg)
(http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s101/Maverick65au/Post%20War%20Australasia/Tornado20.jpg)
(http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s101/Maverick65au/Post%20War%20Australasia/Tornado21.jpg)
(http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s101/Maverick65au/Post%20War%20Australasia/Tornado26.jpg)
(http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s101/Maverick65au/Post%20War%20RAF/Tornado04.jpg)
-
Thank you :)
-
(http://i1080.photobucket.com/albums/j340/ysi_maniac/Drawing/panavia_f4.jpg)
(http://i1080.photobucket.com/albums/j340/ysi_maniac/Drawing/panavia_f111.jpg)
-
How about a Chinese PLAAF Tornado?
-
That F-111/Tornado combination might actually work if some scale-o-rama were to be applied by using a larger scale Tornado with a smaller scale F-111 to get around that wide fuselage problem.
-
RAAF Tornados to replace the F-111s in the late '80s/early '90s.
Thats an idea
-
Or something like this
-
I found an old bagged Airfix MRCA kit and was wondering what to do with it. Greg's idea of an RAAF F-111 replacement is what I was thinking, any other suggestions?
-
Maybe a RNZAF one? Say that as part if the RAAF deal New Zealand also managed to negotiate a joint buy to get a Sqn's worth. This would have the effect of reducing the unit price for both potentially.
-
Not a silly idea...
However, what clothes would a shiny new RAAF Tonka wear?
-
Please tell me why the Tornado F.3's were scrapped? Is it just me or did they have a short service life? Thanks.
-
Daz, if I may I'll refer you to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panavia_Tornado_ADV#Royal_Air_Force (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panavia_Tornado_ADV#Royal_Air_Force)
According to that the F.3 served with the RAF from 1986 to 2011.
-
Please tell me why the Tornado F.3's were scrapped? Is it just me or id they have a short service life? Thanks.
They were designed to counter a specific threat. Now that, that threat has receded, they were no longer needed and their role as an interceptor (not a fighter) could be just as easily covered by the Typhoon.
-
Not a silly idea...
However, what clothes would a shiny new RAAF Tonka wear?
Really depends upon when you introduce them.. If they were to be introduced as an early F-111 replacement, it tend to think something similar to this:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/RAAF_F111.jpg)
-
Done! And now to find some decals...I have the Italeri Hawk ones but I think they may be a bit small...
-
I think you will want either 1 or 6 SQN'S markings.
-
Lots of bombs, a couple of AIM-9s for protection. Which squadron was/is the more mudmover-ey one?
-
1Sqn...though for something different you could go with 6Sqn and arm it with ALARM as a dedicated SEAD unit.
-
Hmm, intriguing...
-
What scale are you looking at?
-
I have the old (1976ish) Airfix 1/72 MRCA :)
-
Novascale do copies of the decals you would want in 1/72.
-
Didn't RAAF F-111s have an anti-ship role with Harpoon too? If so, then an RAAF Tonka could certainly carry a couple, as per the Sea Eagle-armed GR.1Bs that the RAF used to use.
-
Another good suggestion.
(http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSspvuVjw1tyuwaMz3WvAZKqDxRGgoqwhKocFVst6ipqv61rMVUcQ)
-
Didn't RAAF F-111s have an anti-ship role with Harpoon too? If so, then an RAAF Tonka could certainly carry a couple, as per the Sea Eagle-armed GR.1Bs that the RAF used to use.
Yes, the RAAF's F-111Cs could carry Harpoons (not sure if they could carry four but I know they could definitely carrying two). Only F-111s cleared to carry them, I believe. Made them a very potent anti-shipping weapon. Interestingly, the only time they ever carried out an anti-shipping strike in public, they used laser-guided bombs. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4TCqcWkDM0#)
-
Interesting idea, loading up a Tornado with Harpoons/SLAMs, or with ARMS...
BTW, MangoKing, I see whatcha did there with your av and sig--Shockwave from G1 Transformers IIRC.
-
I should think that who the Tornadoes are bought from would determine the likely anti ship missile. By to British standard and get Sea Eagles, buy to German standard and get Kormorans.
I think one of the sadder aspects of the Tornado F.3 retirement was that the SEAD variation they were playing with for a while didn't go into service. According to an F.3 pilot I talked to once, the aircraft was doing quite well in testing for the role and quite many people were optimistic about the aircraft being able to remain in service once the interceptor role was phased out.
-
Yeah - I've thought about doing a couple of special mission Tornado ADVs from the two squadrons left in service after the introduction of the Typhoon:
1. SEAD with extra electronics in place of the radar and guns and either GR.1 belly pylons or a ventral "canoe".
2. Photo-recce with the RAPTOR pod: the F.3's better high altitude performance should let it lift the sensor higher than the GR.4. Not sure if it's possible, but another option might be to re-package the guts of the RAPTOR into an extended nose in place of the radar, thus reducing drag.
Never realised: Airfix did a 1/48th EF.3:
(http://www.oupsmodel.com/images/prods/airfix-maquettes-avion-09175-panavia-tornado-f3-ef3-1-48.jpg)
-
I have that kit. It's, well, ugly.
-
BTW, MangoKing, I see whatcha did there with your av and sig--Shockwave from G1 Transformers IIRC.
8)
Lots of great ideas guys! So many weapon loads to choose from...at least I have the camo sorted!
-
The all new Revell 1:48 Tornado is being awaited with interest. :)
-
The all new Revell 1:48 Tornado is being awaited with interest. :)
Any link to provide additional details?
-
Very late 2013, IDS variant.
-
Very late 2013, IDS variant.
So it could very well be the Italeri Tornado IDS in a Revell box.
-
Tried to PM but my iPad and BtS are not 100% compatible right now for whatever reason.
No...it's all new tool. :)
But right now with RoG, that could mean serious concerns..... :-\
-
The sprue test shots look great.
And if Revell indeed render the Italeri kit redundant, it would make a great basis for a fixed wing GR.whatever.
-
And if Revell indeed render the Italeri kit redundant, it would make a great basis for a fixed wing GR.whatever.
Perhaps using the wings of a 1/100 F-15 as a starting place? The thought had crossed my mind.
-
Assuming the UK, Italy and Germany all operate the Mirage F-1 and Mirage 2000 how about a larger more Bomberish Tornado. An ADV nose profile with bigger engines (broader longer fuselage) and internal weapons bay, an F-111 / SU24 sort of aircraft.
-
And if Revell indeed render the Italeri kit redundant, it would make a great basis for a fixed wing GR.whatever.
Perhaps using the wings of a 1/100 F-15 as a starting place? The thought had crossed my mind.
Hmm! possible (top pic), or even 1/72 F-18C wings (bottom pic)
-
How about TSR 2 wings?
-
How about TSR 2 wings?
As a designated ship killer for Germany, Norway, Denmark, Italy, Spain, Greece, Turkey, and Israel.
-
I'm thinking that TSR.2 wings would be a touch on the large side, but not totally unsuitable.
-
More proportionate and scratch built than a transfer of a 1/72 or 1/48 kit's parts.
-
More proportionate and scratch built than a transfer of a 1/72 or 1/48 kit's parts.
Perhaps in 1/100, much like the F-15 wings I suggested?
-
With the downturn. :)
-
Jaguar wings. :icon_fsm:
-
I'm thinking that same-scale jaguar wings would be a bit small, being for a lighter airframe with less powerful engines. I'm probably trim down some 1/48 Jaguar, or Mitsubishi T-2/F-1, wings until they looked "right" and use them if I wanted that planform.
-
My kits are 1:48 so scratch built wings...or modified F-15 wings from the Monogram kit.
-
For a 1/48 Tornado, 1/72 F-15 wings? By the same token, 1/72 TSR.2 wings?
Going the other way, I'm still considering using 1/48 Tornado wings and adjacent structure to do a V-G TSR.2 in 1/72 (probably carve up teh old Contrail vac-form for that).
-
Fixed wings: old F-15's
(http://i1080.photobucket.com/albums/j340/ysi_maniac/Drawing/tornado_f4.jpg) (http://s1080.photobucket.com/user/ysi_maniac/media/Drawing/tornado_f4.jpg.html)
XL
(http://i1080.photobucket.com/albums/j340/ysi_maniac/Drawing/tornado_xl.jpg) (http://s1080.photobucket.com/user/ysi_maniac/media/Drawing/tornado_xl.jpg.html)
-
the jag wings look spot on!!
-
Always thought a CTOL carrier capable Tornado would be the go had the UK kept their conventional carriers. Initially a GR1 based Bucc replacement then a F3/Tornado 2000 Phantom replacement.
-
Found online:
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-y-c_mzDnZC0/UKU7XLc9liI/AAAAAAAAAS4/nC1FjdS03_8/s1600/tornado.jpg)
-
Niiice!
-
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/fa134477877bf5668e7ce3e14e0910dc/tumblr_msqzswwebP1sb6iwko1_1280.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/72a706639057653cec13530673e983a2/tumblr_myf2s5ngOD1sb6iwko1_1280.jpg)
-
Some impressive load outs:
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sm8unmOOlDg/T7piAaLFWlI/AAAAAAAAA2I/KE3xDfX8FTU/s1600/Radar+chase.jpg)
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mayj1nPwSo1r04vbeo1_1280.jpg)
(http://www.deagel.com/library1/medium/2006/m02006120200268.jpg)
-
This would make an interesting scene to model as a diorama:
(http://www.urbanghostsmedia.com/home/twamoran/urbanghostsmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/panavia-tornado-f3-scrap-rtp.jpg)
-
How about instead of upgrading the GR1 to GR4 the RAF converted the newer more powerful F3 fleet into FA4 strike fighters based loosely on the Tornado 2000 concepts from the early 90s?
A slight fuselage stretch, re-engine, new radar and integrated IRST. It would retain full capability as an interceptor with improved radar and missiles as well as a gaining a superior strike capability to the GR4.
The entire GR1/4 fleet would be retired and the Jaguars and Harriers enhanced in their place. :)
-
How about instead of upgrading the GR1 to GR4 the RAF converted the newer more powerful F3 fleet into FA4 strike fighters based loosely on the Tornado 2000 concepts from the early 90s?
A slight fuselage stretch, re-engine, new radar and integrated IRST. It would retain full capability as an interceptor with improved radar and missiles as well as a gaining a superior strike capability to the GR4.
The entire GR1/4 fleet would be retired and the Jaguars and Harriers enhanced in their place. :)
Re-engine with EJ200's for commonality with Typhoons? Another odd thought, upgrade the LERX with something similar to what was proposed for the Tomcat 21.
-
Sounds good.
Nobody wanted the F3 as an interceptor when there were F-16 fighter bombers available but the GR1/4 would have been a different proposition if sold as a ECR, ASVW, or stand off strike platform, the UK could possibly have sold quite a few of their surplus aircraft had they retained the F3 instead.
The Jaguars and Harriers could have been upgraded to fill CAS and tactical interdiction leaving the FA4 in a predominantly stand off role. The Harrier in particular had a promising upgrade path as evidenced by the US AV-8B+, a similar radar conversion to the GR5/7 would have permitted the retention of the carriers as well. The RAF could have co-developed a Jaguar upgrade with India, possibly using avionics from the Harrier upgrade and core engine upgrades shared with the Hawk to further save costs.
A WIFF yes but I could actually see something like the above delivering greater capability at less overall cost out until the full service introduction of the Typhoon and F-35.
-
Hmm, Tornado FA.4's with Harrier FGR.11's and Jaguar FGR.5's sounds like a potent order of battle. Perhaps add the F.2/F.3/FA.4 fuselage extension to GR.1's as part of an EGR.5 conversion package for British and export use?
Note: Harrier FGR.11 with either the AN/APG-65 radar of the AV-8B+ or with the Blue Vixen, perhaps even an improved version thereof, from the Sea Harrier FA.2. Or if you really want commonality, the Typhoon's radar and IRST.
-
The Jaguars were exetensively upgraded during the 1990s anyway. After the Gulf War, the RAF got a taste for using and abusing the UOR (Urgent Operational Requirement) system to get things done quickly and cheaply without the usual MoD procurement pantomime. This saw Jaguar '96, '97 and (partially) Jaguar '98 upgrades done, which gave the aircraft upgraded engines, a re-vamped digital cockpit, TIALD, Paveway, new recce pod, HMS, NVGs, and GPS/TERPROM. These were known as GR.3As
-
Yes I remember reading up on those, interestingly the article I read stated that as it was seen as an aging platform everything done was with the intent of reducing operational costs and improving reliability as the platform approached retirement. The side effect was a not insignificant improvement in performance in addition to the improved reliability and reduced costs, the upgrades worked so well that you have to wonder why similar concepts aren't used on all in service assets.
-
the upgrades worked so well that you have to wonder why similar concepts aren't used on all in service assets.
Because bypassing the proper acquisition routes causes all sort of long term sustainability issues.
-
I understand that but what they achieved was accelerated configuration change replacing obsolete, no-longer sustainable items with new, superior in production MOTS and COTS alternatives. Long term sustainment was actually improved.
-
Once upon a time there was talk of a single seat Panavia 'Tornado'
-
I understand that but what they achieved was accelerated configuration change replacing obsolete, no-longer sustainable items with new, superior in production MOTS and COTS alternatives. Long term sustainment was actually improved.
I am talking about spares, trained maintainers, maintenance/support programs, manuals, full analysis of impacts etc etc...all those things that are often overlooked in contingency mods/UORs but which will come back to haunt you should the platform remain in service for any period of time without addressing them.
-
Was that the GE F404 powered derivative that West Germany considered as an alternative to the Typhoon?
-
No. It is the Panavia model 100 which was a single seat version considered early on in the MRCA development.
-
the Tornado 2000 concepts from the early 90s?
Speaking of which, this doesn't seem to be included to date.
-
One idea I have had for a while is to do a Tornado heavy air wing for a '80s era CVA-01 based HMS Queen Elizabeth II carrier. This would involve Sea Tornado IDS variants for anti shipping/strike etc and Sea Tordnado ADVs for air defence. Would possibly make for an interesting alternate Falklands war.
-
Random Idea: Indian Air Force Tornados
-
One idea I have had for a while is to do a Tornado heavy air wing for a '80s era CVA-01 based HMS Queen Elizabeth II carrier. This would involve Sea Tornado IDS variants for anti shipping/strike etc and Sea Tordnado ADVs for air defence. Would possibly make for an interesting alternate Falklands war.
Check reply #60 ;)
-
Great minds think alike...or fools never differ ;)
-
Bit of both.
I was looking at doing it years ago pre kids and mortgage the idea being the air-group of a modern day CVA (not necessarily the CVA01 design). F and FA Tornados based on the ADV.
-
Not as attractive looking, but I would base a CV variant on the shorter fuselage of the IDS if possible. Stowage on a carrier is always cramped. I'm not sure of the planform... would a Tonka benefit from oversweep like a Tomcat?
-
Would it need it Silver Fox ? it's much smaller than an F-14
-
Once upon a time there was talk of a single seat Panavia 'Tornado'
That is too much tail for one person to handle on their own ;)
-
I understand that but what they achieved was accelerated configuration change replacing obsolete, no-longer sustainable items with new, superior in production MOTS and COTS alternatives. Long term sustainment was actually improved.
I am talking about spares, trained maintainers, maintenance/support programs, manuals, full analysis of impacts etc etc...all those things that are often overlooked in contingency mods/UORs but which will come back to haunt you should the platform remain in service for any period of time without addressing them.
That's a fair comment for genuine UORs, but the Jag upgrades were really a properly engineered, sensibly organised project of the kind you'd hope the MoD would run in an ideal world. The fact that in the real world the MoD does anything but that lead them to use the UOR mechanism primarily as a means of bypassing the BS, but they were in no sense "lash-ups".
The "spend-to-save" arguments should also be taken with a partial pinch of salt too. There was certainly some of that effect in practice, but the RAF had been asking for an engine upgrade since the early 1980s and the sensor/weapon enhancements were a staightforward capability increase.
-
At a guesstimate, the Tonka would be about 2 meters narrower if it could oversweep. Whether you need it or not is a function of the size of your carrier and the size of your air wing. It looks to be a lot of complexity to achieve... commonality would go down the tubes.
-
I understand that but what they achieved was accelerated configuration change replacing obsolete, no-longer sustainable items with new, superior in production MOTS and COTS alternatives. Long term sustainment was actually improved.
I am talking about spares, trained maintainers, maintenance/support programs, manuals, full analysis of impacts etc etc...all those things that are often overlooked in contingency mods/UORs but which will come back to haunt you should the platform remain in service for any period of time without addressing them.
Missed this earlier. Yes I agree, on the Jaguar however I understand that they did all of this as it happened pre UOR as a life extension of an aging platform until such time as its replacement entered service. What differed, as I remember reading, was that the procurement cycle was improved to provide faster decisions and approvals getting the new gear in service as quickly as possible. I am trying to remember where I read this and if I do I will dig it out, it was a very interesting read.
-
My two cents.. in glorious 1/32
(http://sphotos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1/292727_4709283972309_181122179_n.jpg)
(http://scontent-a-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash2/l/t1/545596_4709269771954_1173354104_n.jpg)
-
Über Cool! :)
-
I wonder if one could bash a Tornado into a HF73 like creation (Note, I don't believe this is a correct rendering of the final design):
(http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/6186/55942129.jpg)
-
This would make an interesting scene to model as a diorama:
([url]http://www.urbanghostsmedia.com/home/twamoran/urbanghostsmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/panavia-tornado-f3-scrap-rtp.jpg[/url])
Definitely a good use for the Airfix 1:48th scale Tornado kit.
-
I wonder if one could bash a Tornado into a HF73 like creation (Note, I don't believe this is a correct rendering of the final design):
([url]http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/6186/55942129.jpg[/url])
Going by other published sources, it's definitely not the final design. However, I would estimate that the wings from a 1/100 F-15 would be a good starting place to blend with a 1/72 Tornado F.3 fuselage. The vertical and horizontal tails might need to come from a 1/100 F-14 if such exists, or possibly a 1/72 F-18 with some reshaping.
-
Ace, from Korea (not the the similarly named Russian kit manufacturer) makes a 1/100 F-14.
-
There's also the Model Hobby Kits F-14 which is about 1/100th, although it says nothing on the box. It's a horrible semi-toy thing, but dirt cheap and good for bits.
Academy make a nicer one and Revell do a pre-painted snap-together one, although the latter is a bit pricey for chopping up.
-
I wonder if one could bash a Tornado into a HF73 like creation (Note, I don't believe this is a correct rendering of the final design):
([url]http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/6186/55942129.jpg[/url])
Going by other published sources, it's definitely not the final design. However, I would estimate that the wings from a 1/100 F-15 would be a good starting place to blend with a 1/72 Tornado F.3 fuselage. The vertical and horizontal tails might need to come from a 1/100 F-14 if such exists, or possibly a 1/72 F-18 with some reshaping.
See my pic in Reply #48 --
-
what weapons and sensors etc do current tornados use?
does anybody make a 72 kit of it with the right bits?
is there anywhere i can get another set of those pieces?
im planning a twin (maybe even triple) build with a modern tornado and tsr2
-
how about a non-swing wing Tornado?? Whatif they developed a delta winged version or fixed wing version with wings similar to the F-15/18?? Would be a very interesting look especially with the high wing, sort of a UK/Europe version of the F-15!
-
maybe in future but not for this build
-
your best bet is to get a Revell Typhoon, it have a nice range of weapons. Don't know who turns out a set of modern one suitable.
-
Hasegawa do a 1/72 weapon set that includes storm shadow, brimstone and alarm
-
your best bet is to get a Revell Typhoon, it have a nice range of weapons. Don't know who turns out a set of modern one suitable.
Try the Airfix Tornado GR.4 kit, it comes free with the weapons set that's in the box :P (guess how I know ;) )
-
your best bet is to get a Revell Typhoon, it have a nice range of weapons. Don't know who turns out a set of modern one suitable.
Try the Airfix Tornado GR.4 kit, it comes free with the weapons set that's in the box :P (guess how I know ;) )
thats what iv done ie buy a revel and airfix kit and il make the revel a gr4 hopeful;ly with enough left over to give the tsr2 the same treatment
-
Hmmm...give the TSR.2 some Tornado intakes and weapons...
-
I've got 1/144 dragon Tornado GR4 and F3, as well as F/A-18E and F-14D each being two kits per box, and am seriously considering buying a Revell Tiffy as well. The aim is to build a FAA Sea Tornado, a FGA, FRS, or FA based on the F.3 airframe, the idea being this is the type the UK develops to replace the Phantom and Buccaneer on the Queen Elisabeth (CVA01) class carriers in the 80s through until 2020.
-
Hmmm...give the TSR.2 some Tornado intakes and weapons...
like this?
(http://i59.tinypic.com/20uoj06.jpg)
(http://i57.tinypic.com/2udvsaw.jpg)
(http://i61.tinypic.com/2h85ruc.jpg)
im going to be starting a conventional tsr2 in modern grey with tornado gr4 loadout
-
The 1/72 Revell GR.1 also has some nice sprues of things for under the wings.
Individual pictures of the sprues can be found here: Model Making (http://www.model-making.eu/products/item_name-142690.html)
-
Single seat Tornado
(http://i1080.photobucket.com/albums/j340/ysi_maniac/Drawing/Tornado_GR4SS.jpg) (http://s1080.photobucket.com/user/ysi_maniac/media/Drawing/Tornado_GR4SS.jpg.html)
-
Single seat Tornado
([url]http://i1080.photobucket.com/albums/j340/ysi_maniac/Drawing/Tornado_GR4SS.jpg[/url]) ([url]http://s1080.photobucket.com/user/ysi_maniac/media/Drawing/Tornado_GR4SS.jpg.html[/url])
Now that's cool!! :-)
M.A.D
-
Hmmm...give the TSR.2 some Tornado intakes and weapons...
There is this painting .......
-
I thought this had already been posted here:
(http://www.hitechweb.genezis.eu/stealth4f.files/Tornado2000-1.jpg)
(http://tinypic.com/ek45mb.gif)
(http://www.hitechweb.genezis.eu/stealth4f.files/Tornado2000-3.jpg)
-
Nice Tornadoes.
-
:smiley:
-
([url]http://photos.smugmug.com/OLDPB/i-P377Rdt/0/47bd3162/O/USAF_FIN_01.jpg[/url])
:icon_fsm:
Something like this in the USAF's "Asia Minor" colors and scheme pattern and a "WS" tailcode for an aircraft based out of an un-surrendered (as it was by the US DoS rather than the USAF) Wheelus AFB.
-
I like the idea of a USAF tornado in this sort of scheme:
(https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/a-10-0430a10close.jpg)
-
I have been thinking about US Tornados as well. First idea is the IDS as a USAF A-7 replacement, ADV as an F-106 replacement and a carrier version of each for the Essex class carriers reactivated under Reagan.
-
How about instead of upgrading the GR1 to GR4 the RAF converted the newer more powerful F3 fleet into FA4 strike fighters based loosely on the Tornado 2000 concepts from the early 90s?
A slight fuselage stretch, re-engine, new radar and integrated IRST. It would retain full capability as an interceptor with improved radar and missiles as well as a gaining a superior strike capability to the GR4.
I had a similar notion Volkodav, but I thought incorporating all the Tornado IDS systems, including fuselage weapons stations into the slightly longer ‘stretched’ Tornado F3 fuselage and it’s improved RB199 Mk.104 engines, hence giving the ‘stretched Tornado IDS' improved acceleration, and importantly greater internal fuel capacity, equalling better range.
M.A.D
-
Some cross-posting of inspiration:
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSAustralia.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSCanada.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSJapan.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSChile.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSJordan.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSOman.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSMalaysia.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSSouthKorea.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSNigeria.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSTaiwan.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSMexico.jpg)
(http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg85/Norman_Rockwell/Aircraft%20Profiles/Panavia%20Tornado/TornadoIDSThailand.jpg)
-
So digging back into childhood for this one. I have searched online and can NOT find any reference, but....
My dad was an AVID reader of the UK Sunday Observer. When we moved to the US in 1980 he got an overseas subscription, so every Tuesday or so the Sunday Observer would arrive. His love of the paper and reading in general rubbed off on my and that combined with a 10-year old's homesickness got me into reading The Observer too.
Well I have a very clear memory of an article around the time of the debate on the UK's nuclear deterrent debate in the early 80s that led to the Trident program. In the article one of the options was called "Airhawk" and it consisted of Tornadoes modified to carry two nuclear Tomahawk cruise missiles. As is still the case, a sub launched ballistic missile was a far superior option for a nuclear deterrent, but I would love to see a model of a Tornado carrying a pair of Tomahawk N missiles. Anyone have any info on this proposal?
-
I guess they would have been talking about the unbuilt AGM-109 series, air-launched Tomahawk.
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-109.html (http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-109.html)
http://ausairpower.net/Tomahawk-Subtypes.html (http://ausairpower.net/Tomahawk-Subtypes.html)
(http://ausairpower.net/USN/MRASM-Variants-S.jpg)
-
Hughes/Smiths Industries Airhawk was a proposed shortened Tomahawk cruise missile proposed against 1994 Staff Requirement (Air) 1236 defined the need for a stand-off missile to be used against hardened targets. It wouldn’t surprise me if there was an earlier iteration proposed.
Some inspiration:
(https://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e68/GTwiner/5CAD2FA3-7237-4C3A-91F9-3FF01EC80F0C_zpsrq2lvouo.jpeg)
-
Before it got cancelled, Northrop-Grumman was going to offer a stretched version of the AGM-137A to that requirement. If anyone cares to model it, I do know the changes required and how to model it in the stowed position for aircraft carriage.
-
Pretty sure I have some 1/48 Tomahawk missiles around too. Could model either this Airhawk derivative or the original AGM-109
(https://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e68/GTwiner/86EB2091-C9C0-45C6-86AE-DD93CD9CA749_zpsbfvjdkfy.jpeg)
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e68/GTwiner/D28EE209-6A35-4144-BDCB-2717188EA73C_zps1rfpfbks.jpeg)
-
Modelcollect has a version in 1/72! LINK! (https://www.scalemates.com/kits/modelcollect-ua72204-aircraft-weapons-set-1-uscruise-missiles--1150538)
-
Modelcollect has a version in 1/72! LINK! (https://www.scalemates.com/kits/modelcollect-ua72204-aircraft-weapons-set-1-uscruise-missiles--1150538)
Yeah, but why would anyone want to play in that small scale? ;)
-
Modelcollect has a version in 1/72! LINK! (https://www.scalemates.com/kits/modelcollect-ua72204-aircraft-weapons-set-1-uscruise-missiles--1150538)
Yeah, but why would anyone want to play in that small scale? ;)
You know the answer Greg ..... ;)
-
Because...
(http://i.imgur.com/H9G8crE.jpg)
-
In an alternate reality...
(http://www.clavework-graphics.co.uk/aircraft/fantasy_4/F316_Tornado_IDS_France.jpg)
-
More:
(http://www.clavework-graphics.co.uk/aircraft/fantasy_1/F012_Tornado_GR4_Iran_1.jpg)
(http://www.clavework-graphics.co.uk/aircraft/fantasy_3/F208_Tornado_Australia.jpg)
(http://www.clavework-graphics.co.uk/aircraft/fantasy_6/F572_Tornado_Scotland.jpg)
-
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/RN%2520SEA%2520TORNADO%2520FRS2.01_zps2qa596mg.jpg&key=224848deb371bbb23d0dfa863bdd11f5c34b5584e7f2f1330c68450bd89fb57e)
-
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/JASDF%2520TORNADO.06_zps3dmedqpx.jpg&key=318173945e0fed9e25abb2bf17e3d1ee60065cc437c7360699eef65b36b39bad)
-
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/IDF%2520TORNADO%2520IDF.06_zpsehocd4hz.jpg&key=d23b97c360389ffa580f6ceef1313272fa021c32c423f44f8867397dd56fd361)
-
Tornado VIP
For Saud family ;D . Sidewinder is installed for self defence.
(https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/j340/ysi_maniac/Tornado-vip_cs2.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds) (https://app.photobucket.com/u/ysi_maniac/a/caec78e4-057f-4fe9-82f4-083a43455765/p/5a19fa07-63eb-410b-b362-bce436205023)
-
(https://images-wixmp-ed30a86b8c4ca887773594c2.wixmp.com/f/0246dd0e-5d49-4d08-a8ae-daa09f0b309f/db1gjpw-7b6fea30-c1a3-429a-8b3d-f0a5e7657962.jpg?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcLzAyNDZkZDBlLTVkNDktNGQwOC1hOGFlLWRhYTA5ZjBiMzA5ZlwvZGIxZ2pwdy03YjZmZWEzMC1jMWEzLTQyOWEtOGIzZC1mMGE1ZTc2NTc5NjIuanBnIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.CsAk4SMIXuYFNO3YhuGTlbgslvmWg567WVjCSKDdZxQ)
-
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/USN%2520F-19A%2520TORNADO.01_zpsqwkpqjgv.jpg&key=8746d5bee0a18d8902d9e83e60e92822722638970d044d830cf542fbea87e1de)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/USN%2520F-19A%2520TORNADO.02_zpstjcxni5f.jpg&key=a5bfee1177182a05538ac9ec592cef658a8281e7b8fa2691b8f5b14bd2c88f5e)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/USN%2520F-19A%2520TORNADO.03_zpspcvh8mmd.jpg&key=feca0dd81f998061c02f3bfd8f890079a0af6188f86344d39fa41826f96ea556)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/USN%2520F-19A%2520TORNADO.04_zpsfgdncxyu.jpg&key=e237ed0b009d642207e7f88066221c6c0652158d2bdbf2ab57169f34ca233057)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/USN%2520F-19A%2520TORNADO.05_zpshytyzqsn.jpg&key=b769d4f2b78049e43071a7a6c16a5bf2d06fdaeb0f9ae4ed0f37be1f4ad96608)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/USN%2520F-19A%2520TORNADO.07_zpslrbfx34o.jpg&key=10093334b4d2177443347113dc7b7be7965e6366e552bd47670ff58fe4e1a2d0)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/USN%2520F-19A%2520TORNADO.06_zpsdfvnm1en.jpg&key=a2062e5e1a58b73d11c773e2a143c09e9cde6a7bfaaa3c2eb75361de4e8707fa)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520B/USN%2520F-19A%2520TORNADO.08_zpsha73sqoc.jpg&key=490accad8f970a680cbbf71727a6d39c4d2d524ee8585ba9e899ff3fbc260680)
-
One of these days I’ll build my Canadian extra long range interceptor with an extended fuselage.
-
Not sure why I haven't posted these on here before but my two Whif Tornadoes...
1/48 Revell F.3 as a USAF Wild Weasel
(https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/8277/IW107i.jpg)
1/72 Hasegawa F.3 with Hase F-18 wings as a straight wing Tornado FG.5
(https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/9097/sxQjnu.jpg)
-
8) 8)
-
:smiley:
-
Those Sea Tornado's look very nice.
-
The F-18 wings look totally natural. F-18A or E?
-
The F-18 wings look totally natural. F-18A or E?
On my model they are A wings. Hasegawa 1/72 F.3 combined with Hasegawa "TF-18A" (F-18B).
-
first question, how high was HMS Ark Royal's hangar deck?
second question, what modifications would be needed to make a marine (Sea) Tornado?
Aeroplanedriver, what did you do with the Tornado's swing wings, make a VG Hornet perhaps?
-
first question, how high was HMS Ark Royal's hangar deck?
I understand both hanger decks had a useable height of 17ft 6in height. As such the tail fin would probably need to be made foldable.
-
first question, how high was HMS Ark Royal's hangar deck?
I understand both hanger decks had a useable height of 17ft 6in height. As such the tail fin would probably need to be made foldable.
You'd have to hinge the radome off to the side so it would fit on the deck elevators.
Add the naval strength tail hook and redesign the tail pipe area to delete the thrust reverser gear. This would save some weight and complexity as well as removing a design aspect that would likely be very susceptible to corrosion at sea.
Strengthen the landing gear to handle carrier operations.
The real challenge would be deciding on the launch system to use: bridle or catpult bar on the nose gear leg.
Presuming the Ark Royal we are refering to is the Audacious Class that was decommissioned in the late 70s and scrapped in 1980, all aircraft that launched from it were launched using the bridle system.
Keeping the Tornado and Ark Royal in their real world timelines, the Tornado still in flight testing when the Ark Royal was decommissioned, I see a possible scenario to make things work:
The proposed CVA-01 carrier project of the early 1960s does not get cancelled and the Audacious Class Ark Royal is retired much earlier and one of the new class of carrier is given the Ark Royal name. You'd still need to make all the above listed design modification to the Tornado, but you wouldn't be constricted by Audacious Class' smaller dimensions.
A refit of the carrier could coincide with the entry of the Tornado into British service in 1982, this could allow th bridle launch system to be replaced with a bar launch system. Looking at the Tornado as it is, I can't see potential bridle hook up and hold-back spots where there isn't already somtehing there, the bar launch would make more sense for it.
As the Sea Harrier was introduced in 1978, it's already a factor by the time the Tornado comes along. The Royal Navy can complement the larger CVA-01 with smaller, ski jump equiped carriers for the Sea Harriers to be based from.
This scenario could possibly open "What if" doors for carrier based, Gr.1 standard Tornados to be part of the Falklands War.
-
Australia finally gets Tornado (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-23/tornado-gr4-arrives-at-perth-aviation-heritage-museum/101173590) ;)
(https://live-production.wcms.abc-cdn.net.au/3b23d6ea9c5c66696f4c42db1ae6d6ab?impolicy=wcms_crop_resize&cropH=488&cropW=868&xPos=328&yPos=39&width=862&height=485)
-
--
-
1/72 Hasegawa F.3 with Hase F-18 wings as a straight wing Tornado FG.5
(https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/9097/sxQjnu.jpg)
Canada buys retired (junked) Tornadoes from Britain on the cheap and rewings them with F-18 parts for supposed bargain basement price aircraft that costs a bundle in engineering work to get it to work!
-
Canada spends bundles of money to have something built cheap ---- na! na! na! where did you get that idea from ------
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
Canada buys retired (junked) Tornadoes from Britain on the cheap and rewings them with F-18 parts for supposed bargain basement price aircraft that costs a bundle in engineering work to get it to work!
Oh, sure, it's funny now. But how can we be absolutely sure that it won't actually happen :o
-
Canada buys retired (junked) Tornadoes from Britain on the cheap and rewings them with F-18 parts for supposed bargain basement price aircraft that costs a bundle in engineering work to get it to work!
Oh, sure, it's funny now. But how can we be absolutely sure that it won't actually happen :o
Quick, make sure all those Tonka airframes have been made into pop cans and motor homes!
-
Canada buys retired (junked) Tornadoes from Britain on the cheap and rewings them with F-18 parts for supposed bargain basement price aircraft that costs a bundle in engineering work to get it to work!
Oh, sure, it's funny now. But how can we be absolutely sure that it won't actually happen :o
Like the purchase of the old Aussie F-18's, it's costing more to upgrade them to current RCAF standard than the cost to buy them.
-
Like the purchase of the old Aussie F-18's, it's costing more to upgrade them to current RCAF standard than the cost to buy them.
Evidence?
-
Nose intake Tornado
(https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/j340/ysi_maniac/NoseIntakeTornado.png?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds) (https://app.photobucket.com/u/ysi_maniac/a/caec78e4-057f-4fe9-82f4-083a43455765/p/9bbcd080-f68f-4bef-bca2-f3d2bdfd1956)
-
Greek Tornados:
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.01_zpsal4lw3xl.jpg&key=88f141c6a325fdf88f395d8f94bead406312bbb0f24af71f92eb6927ff811091)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.04_zpsk2ttqfy5.jpg&key=db9d5f983635c197b9a3668a8dfa82f3ef03055455eea30092fe4c7dbed3d374)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.05_zpss0ffmj8i.jpg&key=411c7898091f35c7637cb8069bd18187b742523dded49f35f95a4816eabc8de9)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.06_zpsk5zuutqq.jpg&key=836b383f27df967bc9c3f7a28b7df381020eaf1f222ac79187eca1a307945872)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.08_zpsraeaefww.jpg&key=17fed741a3289295ed6605e64265bd306119255e12fc3f70e4c3b26ea6fa874d)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.07_zpso06s6qjf.jpg&key=70e1fee4c02aa6dd3fd0d5420031be82a9d3109d8b35d2b169557845e8ab3a28)
-
Kiwi Tornados:
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/RNZAF%2520TORNADO.04_zps08agete4.jpg&key=053ed877544c1e071d1e38d8dc14ae74e7381bea0f994796b5651e159fa64630)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/RNZAF%2520TORNADO.08_zps2f08itup.jpg&key=03d7df9e5eb7b0927dee71818f28b88580e8e9070df4300b034ed00b919eecf4)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/RNZAF%2520TORNADO.07_zpsysgpzcvq.jpg&key=54aa15a1dc5c3654610d0e3a350caa3407c2f3ad70351714a0ab3a59c2bf053f)
-
Spanish:
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202013/EDATORNADOIDS01_zps5ac09b01.jpg&key=bfb0152603a4a5a4ae968821e7dbd71ee1f38acf4736d4337ce1358e2f98c62a)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202013/EDATORNADOIDS02_zpsee003fdb.jpg&key=7e08258bf14f394a7e26201f1e181dc6fc31e986c09339f52d03aeada2635b68)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202013/EDATORNADOIDS04_zpse4d750e8.jpg&key=04e187682bff3d81dbfbc6b6546508fefefe2c2a8dd0d0483e94ae3a96e465e9)
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202013/EDATORNADOIDS05_zps4b35ac45.jpg&key=f6730ab0d967b518a5fcc1c92a97f4ef9ea462384364d1aa2950f63773a88df4)
-
Portuguese:
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/PoAFTORNADOIDS02.jpg&key=dc1f76ee84194dc42dfc39a47ead0da09a0836e1b7f2a1a6aae4717353eeccb4)
-
Finland:
(https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/FINLANDTORNADOFG107.jpg&key=6cc19b457cd60ee546d353e0d8003eb09ed08fdc1f3de68fc375be6e8de7da6d)
-
Nose intake Tornado
(https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/j340/ysi_maniac/NoseIntakeTornado.png?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds) (https://app.photobucket.com/u/ysi_maniac/a/caec78e4-057f-4fe9-82f4-083a43455765/p/9bbcd080-f68f-4bef-bca2-f3d2bdfd1956)
It's an Su-22! :D
-
Tornado F.5 with glove modifications like those proposed for the Tomcat 21, improved radar, EJ200 engines, and Meteor missiles instead of Skyflash.
-
One of these days I need to start on the extended airframe Tornado interceptor for Canada. I have everything, just need to put it together. That wing glove mod sounds cool!
-
Tornado with size and bits of Phantom
(https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/j340/ysi_maniac/TornadoPhantom.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds) (https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/j340/ysi_maniac/TornadoPhantom.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds)
-
RAF Tornado with Vulcan gun
(https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/j340/ysi_maniac/TornadoVulcan.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds) (https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/j340/ysi_maniac/TornadoVulcan.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds)
-
It would be interesting to do a weight of fire comparison between the M61 and the original twin BK-27s
-
(https://mezha.media/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/UA_Fighters_by_matsudaHI_08-900x600.jpg)
-
That would be nice! :smiley:
-
I have a Tornado ADV in the stash with plans to make it an interceptor for Canada. I’ll include an additional fuselage stretch for more fuel and Hindenburg tanks. Decal from an F-18. I need to get on with that. At least it would be an easier build.
-
(https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/attachments/tornado-50th-jpg.771038/)
-
Greek Tornados:
([url]https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.01_zpsal4lw3xl.jpg&key=88f141c6a325fdf88f395d8f94bead406312bbb0f24af71f92eb6927ff811091[/url])
([url]https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.04_zpsk2ttqfy5.jpg&key=db9d5f983635c197b9a3668a8dfa82f3ef03055455eea30092fe4c7dbed3d374[/url])
([url]https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.05_zpss0ffmj8i.jpg&key=411c7898091f35c7637cb8069bd18187b742523dded49f35f95a4816eabc8de9[/url])
([url]https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.06_zpsk5zuutqq.jpg&key=836b383f27df967bc9c3f7a28b7df381020eaf1f222ac79187eca1a307945872[/url])
([url]https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.08_zpsraeaefww.jpg&key=17fed741a3289295ed6605e64265bd306119255e12fc3f70e4c3b26ea6fa874d[/url])
([url]https://combatace.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%2520IF%25202010/WHAT%2520IF%2520ALBUM%2520A/HAF%2520TORNADO%2520F3.07_zpso06s6qjf.jpg&key=70e1fee4c02aa6dd3fd0d5420031be82a9d3109d8b35d2b169557845e8ab3a28[/url])
Given the way matters seem to go in that part of the world, how about Turkish Tornados?
-
You were saying...
(https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhPrH7tTvuw_DRcCOgYkj05HfNPAO6XSPUzGP0BDRhP7UBJtDjf7H22wA0pD6KANV1OARIKQag1D5GzwUUsnUVQe1mR_9qJqQx8lfDdkIE0KZLIvARv-Xyn12-Q3V1Y8AxmI6HIlDdKaqqk/s1600/turaf_tornado_ids_what_if.png)
(https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnzXJsJxhhq7-rRbbrlQL7fL2lf2ud3x3Jeg1VDXQd_2Q4u0qJdiQjxzS6wzt8lnJiS-My6V3z3igR_vhyphenhyphenXjPKnQ-RmblTR8NxQUqIdlXlt5PwnCJoMbxkz3GR-JB5nH66lzZZ3vnDBW3Q/s1600/TornadoADVTurkey.bmp.jpg)