Modelling > Land
Japanese tanks and related
M.A.D:
Thanks for that GTX👍
Yes, you're correct about the philosophies behind each design....the Type 74 appears to be geared towards defence, while the Leo 1 reconn in force.
Given that Australia predominantly using its tanks in the mobile gunfire support role.....
Talking about speed and acceleration of the Leo1, I recall a Leo1 tank commander wanting me to cop an SD16 Lost and Damage (L&D) for damaging the handpiece of the K-Phone on the back of his tank, when as a grunt, I was directing his gun fire onto targets, when all of a sudden the tank accelerated away and I was still holding the handpiece.... After he said I'd be coping the L&D he demanded the hand piece back. To which I replied "screw you mate, you took off without warning and if I'm going to pay for it, I'm keeping it as a souvenir!"
The handpiece still resides in my units Mess and I didn't pay the L&D 👍
MAD
Story:
--- Quote from: M.A.D on September 07, 2022, 08:31:50 AM ---
The handpiece still resides in my units Mess and I didn't pay the L&D 👍
MAD
--- End quote ---
I love stories like that, even though I should spiritually support the TC.
GTX_Admin:
;D
raafif:
up-gun !
Dr. YoKai:
I only recently learned of the pre-war Japanese heavies. The Type 95 makes an interesting comparison to the other multi-turrets of the period.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version