Author Topic: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner  (Read 18313 times)

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding
Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« on: July 02, 2014, 10:25:28 PM »
Going to do this in Canadian North livery following an experience I had one time going 'up-north' in a 737 and then landing on a private gravel runway that serves a diamond mine camp.

At any given time there are 2500 people at the camp, the only way in is up the Ice Road in winter and flying in during the summer.  Personal are changed around at about 100 people each day (that's a 100 coming in and 100 going out) so my thoughts were what if you could move 200 people each day and use something that could use the existing infrastructure.  C-130's use the airfield regularly so I'd expect an A400 could use whatever the C-130 can. 

The idea then is to put an A400 wing onto an A310 fuselage which sounds quite simple  -----  until I started looking into it.

Here's a pic of what I'm attempting (kindly put together by Kit [PR19-Kit])

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2014, 10:40:37 PM »
I had made a start a while ago but everything got put on hold, top pic is from then, the bottom pic shows where it is today.  All I have done so far was to sand the A310 fuselage sides and cut out a wing box from an A400M and glue that part to the top wing half.

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2014, 10:51:04 PM »
Big part of the planning was getting a set of decals for it,  JBot Decals does a number of 737 sheets in the scheme I wanted to do but after a couple of emails to them asking if they could do a custom set for me I got no reply.  I then asked Kit if he could help me out and we were in the process of sorting things out when I suddenly got an email from JBot saying my decals were ready (without saying that they were actually taking on what I wanted).  Which put me in a spot ---

Anyway, Kit was very understanding when I explained what happened.

So these are the decals I'll be using specifically sized for an A310 fuselage  - in 1/72 that is --
« Last Edit: July 03, 2014, 02:06:39 AM by kitnut617 »

Online GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2014, 02:18:06 AM »
This is going to be great!
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

Offline buzzbomb

  • Low Concentration Span, oft wanders betwixt projects
  • Accurate Scale representations of fictional stuff
    • Club and my stuff site
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2014, 06:25:22 AM »
woo hool. Terrific start, totally prepared

Offline tsrjoe

  • Has been volunteered... for something...
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2014, 01:09:27 AM »
waw, this is going to look amazing, a big b... too :D  8)

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2014, 09:38:30 PM »
Thanks guys:

As usually with my what-ifs, I like to have some plausibility to them, switching the wing seems a bit weird but these photos show they're quite close in size and wing area.  I'd imagine the A400M airfoil is more advanced than the A310's being of later design and that a large area of it is covered by prop-wash which I'd guess helps with lift.

The A310 fuselage is a couple of inches longer than the A400 fuselage, but it's marginally smaller in diameter, the A310 measures 76mm (in 1/72) whereas the A400's measures at 78mm.  The big difference is in the cross-section though, the A310 is dead round, whereas the A400 is only round from the 8 o'clock position, up to 12 o'clock, and back down to 4 o'clock. The cargo floor runs straight across from 4 to 8 o'clock and below that the bottom of the fuselage flattens out some, so that it measures 71mm from top to bottom.

Another project I'm working on is a stretched A400M, which actually ends up about the same length as the A310 fuselage (I'll post this build some time later)  which is the reason why this build is going ahead --- I had to buy two A400M's to do the stretch which left a lot of spare parts left over ---  ;D  But if you're thinking I'm going to have a lot of A310 parts left over --- well no.  The kit is an Aircraft in Miniature one, and I had written to Neil (the owner) asking if he had a pair of left-over fuselage halves (or some rejects) I could buy. He said he had so I bought them.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2014, 10:01:26 PM by kitnut617 »

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2014, 10:05:52 PM »
Going off topic slightly to the recent USAF air tanker acquisition, if all the USAF wanted was a 767 size tanker, why did Airbus offer the A330 where the A310 (which is practically the same size as the 767) would probably served it better in the competition.

Offline kerick

  • Responsible for all surrendered booty....Arrrr!!!!
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #8 on: July 04, 2014, 11:56:19 PM »
I wonder why Airbus even entered into that competition since everybody knew the US military and Congress would not settle for a non American made aircraft. Wasted a lot of time and money.

Back to the thread here, very nice idea! Looks like good progress and cudos for getting decals ahead of time. Always one of my hang ups on a project. I hope to see more of this one!

I whiffed a 737 in the same train of thought by moving the wings to the top of the fuselage to get the engines higher off the ground. Still sitting on the bench because I don't know what scheme to paint it in.

Online GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2014, 03:45:39 AM »
Going off topic slightly to the recent USAF air tanker acquisition, if all the USAF wanted was a 767 size tanker, why did Airbus offer the A330 where the A310 (which is practically the same size as the 767) would probably served it better in the competition.

Amongst other reasons because the A330 was still in production whereas the A310 was not.
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #10 on: July 10, 2014, 04:50:57 AM »
A little bit of progress  ----

The Aircraft in Miniature kits have a unique way for assembly.  Most have a keel which helps keep the fuselage halves from collapsing when you glue them together and increases the strength of the fuselage.

Top pic shows the parts of another A310 in pieces, and also where I've glued the keel in on the one I'm working on.  The AiM kits are mostly advertised as being 'pre-cut', this does not mean they are 'cut-to-size', it just means the parts have been cut out of the sheet but there's still a lot of sanding to do.

I've now glued the other fuselage half on and what you have to do is ""flood"" the joint with liquid glue (what the instructions say to do), the bottom pic shows how I'm holding it in place while the glue sets

Online Jeffry Fontaine

  • Unaffiliated Independent Subversive...and the last person to go for a trip on a Mexicana dH Comet 4
  • Global Moderator
  • His stash is able to be seen from space...
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #11 on: July 10, 2014, 05:02:17 AM »
So the sledge hammer in the corner is for making "major adjustments" to difficult projects? ;)
"Every day we hear about new studies 'revealing' what should have been obvious to sentient beings for generations; 'Research shows wolverines don't like to be teased" -- Jonah Goldberg

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #12 on: July 10, 2014, 05:11:15 AM »
 ;D

I have to make some adjustments so everything lines up right Jeff ----   :P

Offline Brian da Basher

  • He has an unnatural attraction to Spats...and a growing fascination with airships!
  • Global Moderator
  • Hulk smash, Brian bash
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #13 on: July 10, 2014, 06:03:35 AM »
This has the makings of one amazing project, Robert!

There's never enough Canadian airliners!

Brian da Basher

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding
Re: Airbus A310/A400 Un-prepared Airfield Airliner
« Reply #14 on: July 10, 2014, 06:39:46 AM »
Thanks Brian,  the next thing I have to see if I can get, is some of that pale blue the rear fuselage and fin is painted with.  I contacted Canadian North a while ago and asked what shade it is and they were kind enough to provide the paint code but the only place where I can get it is down in Ontario.  I'll give them a call tomorrow (or sometime soon).  When I got my decals I also got some real world ones for a 1/72 737-300 which Canadian North really do operate, I'll probably get either the Welsh Models one (got a couple of their other 737's in the stash) or the new Aircraft in Miniature one as soon as it's available.  The idea is to pose them together once built --
« Last Edit: July 10, 2014, 06:43:21 AM by kitnut617 »