Beyond The Sprues

Modelling => Ideas & Inspiration => Aero-space => Topic started by: Daryl J. on June 16, 2012, 07:39:52 AM

Title: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Daryl J. on June 16, 2012, 07:39:52 AM
Now we all know the Swordfish is nearly perfect as is. ;D
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: finsrin on June 16, 2012, 09:28:59 AM
Couple J-85's mounted A-10 style for takeoff and combat power.  What more could it need ?
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: GTX_Admin on June 16, 2012, 03:18:30 PM
How about an inline version?
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: finsrin on June 16, 2012, 03:33:44 PM
How about an inline version?

Make it a Merlin + the jets.    Now Swordfish needs drop tanks for fuel.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: jcf on June 19, 2012, 09:12:54 AM
How about an inline version?


Done, by Fairey and actually before the TSR II/Swordfish, the Kestrel engined S.9/30:
http://www.aviastar.org/air/england/fairey_s9-30.php (http://www.aviastar.org/air/england/fairey_s9-30.php)

(http://www.aviastar.org/pictures/england/fairey_s9-30.gif)

The S.9/30, and it's Panther engined predecessor the TSR I, lead directly to the TSR II/Swordfish.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: GTX_Admin on June 19, 2012, 07:48:21 PM
Hmmm...might need to get me a Swordfish kit...and a Hawker Fury....
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Rickshaw on June 20, 2012, 03:40:47 PM
Looks much too dainty for a Swordfish alternative.   How about a Swordfish with a Merlin?  Afterall, they put Merlins on nearly everything else, didn't they?  ;D
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: jcf on June 21, 2012, 02:02:01 AM
Yep, it's interesting how the inline makes it look so much smaller. In reality the Swordfish was only longer by one
additional fuselage bay, 2', and the wingspan was only 6" greater. The enlarged fin of the Swordfish is what creates
the visual difference.

A single-stage Merlin would fit easily as its not much different in terms of external dimensions when compared to
the supercharged Kestrel IIMS used on the S.9/30. A Hurricane I or, better yet, a Battle or Fulmar nose would
probably fit fairly well.

The 9-cylinder R-1820 along with the Hercules, R-1830 and Gnome-Rhone 14-cylinder engines are all viable re-engining
possibilities. Heck, why not a Nakajima Sakae on an IJN variant?  Single row engines like the R-1820 could have the
standard short-chord or full NACA-type cowlings, see the Blackburn Shark for applicable real world examples.

... and as a blast-from-the-past three of Jennings Heilig's Stringbag What-Ifs:
(http://www.madoc.us/pictures/profiles/jh/899swordfish.jpg)
899 Swordfish

(http://www.madoc.us/pictures/profiles/jh/coral_sea_swordfish.jpg)
Coral Sea Swordfish

(http://www.madoc.us/pictures/profiles/jh/faireishi.jpg)
Faireishi

From Madoc Pope's kindly hosted archive page:
http://www.madoc.us/profiles.html (http://www.madoc.us/profiles.html)
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: tigercat on June 21, 2012, 03:17:33 AM
Swordfish plus Double Mamba surely
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: jcf on June 21, 2012, 03:45:43 AM
I could see a P.24.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Monarch (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Monarch)

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/Fairey_p24.jpg)

P.24 powered Battle:
(http://crimso.msk.ru/Images6/AI/AI58-5/25-5.jpg)
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Daryl J. on June 21, 2012, 10:42:46 AM
So if I read between the lines correctly, what we have going on here is the foundation for a Fairey Swordfish on floats with an American engine serving in the PacNW's Defense of Bremerton patrol unit.     :)     Queen of the Emerald City one would read.   If there were any involved further south in the Portland area it could be The Weird One.   
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: jcf on June 21, 2012, 12:22:56 PM
So if I read between the lines correctly, what we have going on here is the foundation for a Fairey Swordfish on floats with an American engine serving in the PacNW's Defense of Bremerton patrol unit.     :)     Queen of the Emerald City one would read.   If there were any involved further south in the Portland area it could be The Weird One.   

If you mean the P.24 engine then no, it was a Brit engine. The Battle test-bed was shipped to the US and tested at Wright Field, thus the rudder sripes in the photo.

However, if on the other hand you are ruminating about an Allison engined variant, then, well of course 'twould be based in Bremerton ... or Port Angeles ... or Everett ... or ...    ;)
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Daryl J. on June 21, 2012, 12:39:34 PM
...or the more boring R-1820 or 1830.   Nope, no p.24 engine.

Now as to the Allison...... :) :) :)
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Acree on March 02, 2017, 09:42:36 AM
I now have a new-mold Airfix Swordfish in the stash, and I seem to have developed an allergy to OOB building.  Here are three ROUGH sketches of some ideas.  Any thoughts?  Which one do you like best, or do you have other suggestions?

(https://c1.staticflickr.com/4/3863/33041251872_4712baf9ee_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/SkK43q)swordfish ambulance (https://flic.kr/p/SkK43q) by cacree (https://www.flickr.com/photos/144515244@N05/), on Flickr
(https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2890/33198105095_892cd30e71_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/SzAY3k)swordfish reengine (https://flic.kr/p/SzAY3k) by cacree (https://www.flickr.com/photos/144515244@N05/), on Flickr
(https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2844/32382858593_fe38613009_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/RkyBEa)swordfish vip (https://flic.kr/p/RkyBEa) by cacree (https://www.flickr.com/photos/144515244@N05/), on Flickr
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: The Big Gimper on March 02, 2017, 10:59:10 AM
I am not helping here as I like all 3 versions.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: elmayerle on March 02, 2017, 01:12:23 PM
Ambulance with R1820.  Let the VIPs find their own way.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Volkodav on March 02, 2017, 02:29:58 PM
How about a parasol or gull wing monoplane version with an enclosed cockpit canopy?
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: jcf on March 02, 2017, 03:29:02 PM
A cowling like that of the Blackburn Shark II would be more
likely than a Northrop/Douglas 8 type.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Kelmola on March 02, 2017, 05:08:17 PM
Ambulance with R1820.  Let the VIPs find their own way.
This sounds most promising. Swordfish's STOL capabilities would be very useful in the ambulance role before the age of helicopters.

For VIPs, there were already much more comfortable options available already when the Stringbag was introduced into service, even more post-war.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Vuk on March 03, 2017, 02:04:38 AM
My vote for the ambulance version... Here's the real world Polikarpov U-2 ambulance version designated S-2...
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Acree on March 03, 2017, 02:14:42 AM
I think I am definitely leaning toward the ambulance.  Not decided about re-engining yet.  If I could find a nice Douglas O-43 to nick the Curtiss Conqueror from, I would do that in a heartbeat.
(https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/260/33169230036_8da3329f9c_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/Sx3Yuu)Conqueror Swordfish (https://flic.kr/p/Sx3Yuu) by cacree (https://www.flickr.com/photos/144515244@N05/), on Flickr
But I have a bit of a backstory for the ambulance in mind, and re-engining really doesn't fit well.   

FYI, backstory has to do with a Swordfish from a to-be-determined carrier disembarked and left behind in British Guyana, converted to ambulance duty.  That's also why I thought the VIP transport idea might work - transporting colonial civil and military officials between the various British colonies in the Caribbean area. 

It will be a while before I get to this build, so I'll continue to cogitate upon it.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Acree on March 03, 2017, 02:16:45 AM
thanks, Vuk!  The ambulance / limousin versions of the Po-2/U-2 were my inspiration for the Swordfish ambulance!

Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: tankmodeler on March 03, 2017, 03:23:08 AM
R-1820

Semi retracting gear (a la F4F Wildcat)

Torpedo bomber with enclosed cockpit and a manual turret (like on the Martin B-10).

Oooorrrr:

R-1820

Semi retracting gear (a la F4F Wildcat)

Enclosed cockpit like the ambulance but for radar operators and a partially retracting thimble radome for surface or air search.

Slipper tanks under the lower wings.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: apophenia on March 03, 2017, 06:25:30 AM
The Curtiss Conqueror is an interesting choice. The V-1570 Conqueror was an improved and enlarged derivative of the 1,150 cid Curtiss D-12 which was imported into the UK as the Fairey Felix. So, in Whif-World, maybe Fairey imports the Conqueror under its own brand too?

Of course, Fairey developed a V-12 aero-engine of its own -- the 1,558 cid Fairey P.12 Prince of c.1935. Jon has already suggested a Merlin-Swordfish with Battle or Fulmar nose. You could go that route in styrene but whif the engine-development history to claim that Fairey persisted with their P.12 Prince engine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Prince_(V-12) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Prince_(V-12))

Alternatively, go with the 1,500 hp Fairey P.16 Prince ... a smaller H-16 related to the P.24 Monarch mentioned by Jon. You'd need to scratch-build the cowling but it was a fairly simple, blocky shape. And, though contra-rotating, the spinnerless propellers do resemble your Conqueror set-up.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Vuk on March 03, 2017, 03:49:14 PM
thanks, Vuk!  The ambulance / limousin versions of the Po-2/U-2 were my inspiration for the Swordfish ambulance!
Don't mention... I found another one, with slightly different windows... great work of Polish artist Marek Radomski on the website of Polish Aviation Museum in Krakow. There's a lot of his artwork, just choose the aircraft type from falling menu above...

http://www.muzeumlotnictwa.pl/galeria_en.php?ng=5&ig=82 (http://www.muzeumlotnictwa.pl/galeria_en.php?ng=5&ig=82)
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: tankmodeler on March 04, 2017, 12:10:44 AM
Alternatively, go with the 1,500 hp Fairey P.16 Prince .
I'd suggest that 1500 hp would be far too much for an aircraft built around a 650-700 hp engine. Using a 900-1000 ho engine is probably as much as you'll get out of that airframe. As a biplane, and with all that rigging, its never going to go too much faster, so the extra HP will be wasted anyway.

Paul
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: apophenia on March 04, 2017, 03:40:56 AM
I'd suggest that 1500 hp would be far too much for an aircraft built around a 650-700 hp engine...

Agreed. I suggested the P.16 simply because it's the only 'real world' option from the Fairey engine stable.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: Acree on March 04, 2017, 04:20:31 AM
I originally posited the Conqueror based on being in the approximately right hp range, but giving a radically different look. A Kestrel would accomplish the same thing, but I like the rounded, blunt nose of the O-43 or Consolidated PB-2 installation.  Either way, this time around I think I'll pass on the re-engine anyway, because of the backstory.
Title: Re: Fairey Swordfish
Post by: tankmodeler on March 07, 2017, 12:10:02 AM
Agreed. I suggested the P.16 simply because it's the only 'real world' option from the Fairey engine stable.
;)