Author Topic: PB-2A SAAF  (Read 2600 times)

Online Acree

  • That will teach you to frustrate the powers that be...won't it comrade?
  • Moderator
  • Sentenced to time in the BTS Gulag...
PB-2A SAAF
« on: October 16, 2019, 08:38:25 AM »
Here is a PB-2A of No. 43 Squadron, SAAF (see Robomog's entry above for justification!)  Just a very quick profile.  Enjoy!
PB-2A SAAF by cacree, on Flickr

Offline Robomog

  • ...had a very bad experience with [an] orange...
  • Would you buy a used kit from this man?
Re: PB-2A SAAF
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2019, 01:00:02 PM »
That looks really good, that might just have swung me back to desert camouflage on the P26

Aaaah decisions, decisions !!   ;)

Mog
>^-.-^<
Mostly Harmless...............

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: PB-2A SAAF
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2019, 06:48:12 PM »
 :smiley:
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: PB-2A SAAF
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2019, 11:27:36 AM »
Nice, but I wonder if the PB-2A's might be refitted with Allison V1710 engines, along the lines of what Bell did to the XA-11A Allison testbed, to give them a more modern and capable engine?

Online Acree

  • That will teach you to frustrate the powers that be...won't it comrade?
  • Moderator
  • Sentenced to time in the BTS Gulag...
Re: PB-2A SAAF
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2019, 12:45:17 PM »
Of course such a thing is possible, but with the Allison weighing 40% more than the Conqueror, I'm not sure a V-1710-powered PB-2 would be practical as a combat aircraft.  Moreover, with only about 30 PB-2As available, the development and conversion work would probably not be worth the effort and delay.  Still - would be cool-looking!

Another possibility would be a Twin Wasp version as proposed by Consolidated for the P-33. 
« Last Edit: October 17, 2019, 12:46:56 PM by Acree »

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: PB-2A SAAF
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2019, 08:33:48 PM »
Development of the basic conversion was already on the XA-11A which served as the first flying testbed for the Allison engine; 'twas also the first major contract awarded to Bell Aircraft.

Offline taiidantomcat

  • Plastic Origamist...and not too shabby with the painting either!
  • Full Member
  • Stylishly late...because he was reading comics
Re: PB-2A SAAF
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2019, 04:32:25 AM »
That is one unique looking bird!  :o
"They know you can do anything, So the question is, what don't you do?"

-David Fincher

Offline jcf

  • Global Moderator
  • Turn that Gila-copter down!
Re: PB-2A SAAF
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2019, 04:54:35 AM »
I agree that a V-1710 on a PB-2A makes little sense, the increase in weight would
seriously reduce it's usable fuel and munitions load making the increase in power
a wash.
Perhaps instead Curtiss pulls its finger out and solves the problems with the Conqueror?

Of course, Curtiss pulling its finger out is one of the great What-If?s of history.  ;D
“Conspiracy theory’s got to be simple.
Sense doesn’t come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated shit
actually is than they ever are about
whatever’s supposed to be behind the
conspiracy.”
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014