Author Topic: Tophe's slanting views (Read 356345 times)

Tophe · « **Reply #400 on:** May 08, 2013, 06:08:55 AM »

Thanks Brian.

Now the Doblhoff WNF342 helicopter is famous, but the WNF343 derivative airplane is not:

apophenia · « **Reply #401 on:** May 08, 2013, 09:43:37 AM »

Quite an improvement, really

Nice work Tophe!

Tophe · « **Reply #402 on:** May 10, 2013, 08:18:19 AM »

Thanks Apophenia.

Now archives have demonstrated that, while the Centre NC.900 was just a French Fw-190, the NC.900Z was different from the Fw-190Z:

Tophe · « **Reply #403 on:** May 14, 2013, 03:59:15 PM »

From Hungary, the cargo glider Rubik R21 and derivative of mine:

finsrin · « **Reply #404 on:** May 14, 2013, 04:03:58 PM »

Seaplane in "Floaty" is cool

Another one of those wanna build it in styrene designs. :)

Tophe · « **Reply #405 on:** May 15, 2013, 11:03:41 AM »

Thanks finsrin.

Now, from the Hasegawa Hitachi A6M2K trainer can be made a Twin-Zero with tandem seats:

elmayerle · « **Reply #406 on:** May 15, 2013, 11:30:50 AM »

Quote from: Tophe on May 15, 2013, 11:03:41 AM

Thanks finsrin.

Now, from the Hasegawa Hitachi A6M2K trainer can be made a Twin-Zero with tandem seats:

Why not a single seat on one side and tandem seats on the other. The single seat could be the pilot and the tandem seats could be high-ranking, or otherwise important, passengers.

Tophe · « **Reply #407 on:** May 15, 2013, 03:24:50 PM »

Yes, thanks engineer, the Hitachi factory produces these extra versions immediately:

Tophe · « **Reply #408 on:** May 17, 2013, 02:46:30 AM »

While the CASA C-2111 was just a normal Heinkel He-111, the C-2111Z was different from the He-111Z:

raafif · « **Reply #409 on:** May 17, 2013, 08:09:10 AM »

makes much more sense than wasting a 2nd crew in the other fuselage :)

I was going to do a zwiling on your AGA XLRG-2 marine glider

apophenia · « **Reply #410 on:** May 17, 2013, 08:43:11 AM »

The Rubik R21! You do find thre rarities Tophe!

Tophe · « **Reply #411 on:** May 18, 2013, 01:02:52 AM »

Thanks.
And as Doblhoff did, AGA/Firestone/G&A transformed an autogyro into an airplane:

GTX_Admin · « **Reply #412 on:** May 18, 2013, 04:00:04 AM »

apophenia · « **Reply #413 on:** May 18, 2013, 04:08:43 AM »

Nice! I like that you've retained the up-turned tips to the horizontal tail :)

Tophe · « **Reply #414 on:** May 23, 2013, 02:23:00 AM »

Thanks again.

Here is a push-pull twin-engined Spitfire:

Tophe · « **Reply #415 on:** May 23, 2013, 02:36:21 AM »

And further from the original Spitfire: a pusher one:

Empty Handed · « **Reply #416 on:** May 24, 2013, 01:30:49 AM »

I like the pusher Spit!

apophenia · « **Reply #417 on:** May 24, 2013, 02:37:17 AM »

Yes, the PushSpit is destined to drive the purists wild! :)

Tophe · « **Reply #418 on:** May 24, 2013, 11:00:10 PM »

Thanks a lot...

And after the relative success (and safety) of the Spitfire-floatplane, the Griffon-Spitfire was fitted with spats:

Tophe · « **Reply #419 on:** May 25, 2013, 01:27:58 AM »

Spitfire/Spitacobra/FTB-Spitfire:

Tophe · « **Reply #420 on:** May 26, 2013, 02:50:00 AM »

Twin-Spitacobra:

raafif · « **Reply #421 on:** May 26, 2013, 06:26:27 AM »

mixed engine positions ? The right fuselage seems to have the engine in the nose but the forward cockpit seems to mean a mid-engine for the left fuselage !
Can you add the exhaust stubs to show it ??

Tophe · « **Reply #422 on:** May 26, 2013, 01:57:53 PM »

Both have mid-engine. The starboard fuselage has a cockpit at the same position as a P-39 and the port fuselage has a cockpit at the same position as a FTB Mustang...
Drawing oblical curved exhaust pipes in slanting view is not easy, I may try but I am not sure to get a satisfying result.

lauhof52 · « **Reply #423 on:** May 26, 2013, 03:40:11 PM »

Spitacobra is top!

Tophe · « **Reply #424 on:** May 26, 2013, 05:00:29 PM »

Thanks!
Here is the view with exhaust pipes:


Swords to Plowshares GB Now Open!!

News:

Author Topic: Tophe's slanting views (Read 356345 times)