Author Topic: Tophe's slanting views (Read 356381 times)

GTX_Admin · « **Reply #125 on:** June 04, 2012, 02:38:55 AM »

Even better

apophenia · « **Reply #126 on:** June 04, 2012, 06:12:34 AM »

Love the F-16TL Tophe! That "preliminary step before the F-16TB (twin-boom)" looks like it might evolve into a vectoring-nozzle type :)

Tophe · « **Reply #127 on:** June 04, 2012, 11:35:56 AM »

Thank you my friends.
And here is the F-16Z Zwilling-Falcon:

apophenia · « **Reply #128 on:** June 05, 2012, 09:54:45 AM »

Very nice F-16Z! Is there also going to be twin-boomer with a single fuselage?

Tophe · « **Reply #129 on:** June 05, 2012, 12:26:04 PM »

Thanks!

So here is the F-16BP (BiPoutre for export to France):

RussC · « **Reply #130 on:** June 05, 2012, 03:58:53 PM »

Quote from: Tophe on June 05, 2012, 12:26:04 PM

Thanks!
So here is the F-16BP (BiPoutre for export to France):

Interesting! and a improve on the idea of the F7u Cutlass!

finsrin · « **Reply #131 on:** June 05, 2012, 04:32:19 PM »

F-16BP is added to my favorites list. :)

GTX_Admin · « **Reply #132 on:** June 06, 2012, 03:05:31 AM »

Now that is attractive.

apophenia · « **Reply #133 on:** June 06, 2012, 03:44:23 AM »

Oooo, F-16BP (BiPoutre) wasn't what I was expecting at all. Very nice Tophe! :)

AXOR · « **Reply #134 on:** June 06, 2012, 03:53:07 AM »

Impressive,I like F-16 BP !

Alex

Tophe · « **Reply #135 on:** June 06, 2012, 12:42:33 PM »

Thanks to all, for your liking these fast-made drawings, far worse than yours, so perfect.

Quote from: apophenia on June 06, 2012, 03:44:23 AM

Oooo, F-16BP (BiPoutre) wasn't what I was expecting at all.

Is this more what you expected?:

GTX_Admin · « **Reply #136 on:** June 06, 2012, 02:58:10 PM »

RussC · « **Reply #137 on:** June 06, 2012, 04:03:39 PM »

Quote from: Tophe on June 06, 2012, 12:42:33 PM

Thanks to all, for your liking these fast-made drawings, far worse than yours, so perfect.

Its really the idea that counts here. As long as legible, its all that is needed.
Any sketch can always be expanded, colored or changed later.
Perfect is very subjective!

finsrin · « **Reply #138 on:** June 06, 2012, 04:14:24 PM »

"Its really the idea that counts here. As long as legible, its all that is needed."
Russ says it right !

AXOR · « **Reply #139 on:** June 06, 2012, 04:21:52 PM »

Quote from: RussC on June 06, 2012, 04:03:39 PM

Its really the idea that counts here. As long as legible, its all that is needed.
Any sketch can always be expanded, colored or changed later.
Perfect is very subjective!

Totally agree !!!
By the way,I also like the last one!

Alex

Tophe · « **Reply #140 on:** June 07, 2012, 12:38:02 AM »

Thank you my friends!

Well, my idea was not good either: there should not be a double-fin but a double half-area fin. So I have applied a square root of 2, divided by 2, scale (70%) on the fins:

apophenia · « **Reply #141 on:** June 07, 2012, 06:56:07 AM »

Quote from: Tophe on June 06, 2012, 12:42:33 PM

Is this more what you expected?:

Exactly! Although I do like your later version with the scaled-down fins. I can just see that version with vectoring exhaust!

Tophe · « **Reply #142 on:** June 07, 2012, 12:02:17 PM »

AV-8 like? or X-35 like? or F-22 like? tell me and I will try.

elmayerle · « **Reply #143 on:** June 07, 2012, 12:56:12 PM »

More like P.1216 I reckon. F-35B rear nozzle with front vectored nozzles.

apophenia · « **Reply #144 on:** June 08, 2012, 06:31:27 AM »

I was thinking more of the 2D exhausts seen on experimental Flankers.

elmayerle · « **Reply #145 on:** June 08, 2012, 08:57:32 AM »

Quote from: apophenia on June 08, 2012, 06:31:27 AM

I was thinking more of the 2D exhausts seen on experimental Flankers.

Which were replaced by vectoring axi-symmetric nozzles as their technology progressed. For that matter, an experimental F-16 flown with a similar vectoring nozzle under the AVEN (Axisymmetric Vectoring Exhuast Nozzle) program.

Tophe · « **Reply #146 on:** June 08, 2012, 11:20:31 AM »

Both the Su-37 and F-16 AVEN have vertor-thrust with no special aspect, so... I have comen back to the P.1216 aspect and to preliminary 2D vector exhaust:

apophenia · « **Reply #147 on:** June 09, 2012, 10:49:13 AM »

Very nice Tophe! And naming the file "r_Mirage5_v.JPG" will help with counter-espionage efforts :)

Tophe · « **Reply #148 on:** June 09, 2012, 11:36:31 AM »

I am glad I have succeded in matching your dream more or less, Apophenia.

The name of the file is because the Corel draw source is a common file with the Mirage 5, page after page. This came from my "going away of 1940s' warbirds", just for these supersonic beauties, before going back maybe.

Tophe · « **Reply #149 on:** June 12, 2012, 11:46:01 AM »

And here is a Mustang family of wings: normal, high altitude, double, circular...


Swords to Plowshares GB Now Open!!

News:

Author Topic: Tophe's slanting views (Read 356381 times)