Beyond The Sprues

Modelling => Ideas & Inspiration => Scenarios => Topic started by: GTX_Admin on November 01, 2013, 02:42:16 AM

Title: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: GTX_Admin on November 01, 2013, 02:42:16 AM
Hi folks,

Here's a scenario based upon real events:  In 1936 the Australian Govt sent a technical mission to Europe (I understand they went to the UK, the Netherlands, France, Italy and Germany) and the USA to evaluate modern aircraft types and select a type suitable to Australia's defence needs and within Australia's capabilities to build. The three-man mission (which included Sir Lawrence James Wackett) lasted five months and on its return advised that the North American NA-16 was the most suitable type.

Following on from this the Commonwealth Aircraft Corporation (CAC) commenced production of the first aircraft mass-produced in Australia, the CAC Wirraway development of the NA-16.  The rest as they say is history.

What if though other platforms had been decided upon.  For instance:

UK:  Spitfire, Hurricane...maybe too advanced to commence with?

Netherlands:  Fokker D.XXI and/or G.I? 

France: ?

Italy: CR.42?

Germany:  Maybe something like the Bf-108 to start with?  Fw-200 based transport/maritime patrol?

USA: ?

Thoughts?  i think that realistically, some of the fighters etc I listed would be too great a first leap.  Probably something like a trainer or liaison aircraft would be the first followed by something more powerful.
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: elmayerle on November 01, 2013, 06:41:19 AM
Going for commonality, perhaps Seversky's proposed trainers, to be followed by the P-35?  I could see a parallel evolution of the design in Australia to what happened elsewhere, though it would be interesting if they stayed "small" and more closely approximated the Caproni-Reggiane evolution than the evolution from P-35 to XP-72.
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: Volkodav on November 01, 2013, 06:52:35 AM
The RAAF had only recently started operating the Hawker Demon at this time as a fighter and an Army Cooperation type.  It would make sense to have gone with the Hurricane, Hotspur and Henley along with licence production of the RR Merlin.
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: Logan Hartke on November 01, 2013, 09:17:06 AM
If you want the hum drum practical options, you're probably looking at fighters like the Gladiator, the Seversky fighters, the Hawk 75, or the Hurricane.  Other types would likely be the

Here are some possible alternatives exported during that period:

(http://www.keparuhaz.hu/images/tmp/400/products/87/2287.jpg)

UK:  Gloster Gladiator, Hawker Hurricane

(http://kits.kitreview.com/images/SH72113-Fokker-D.XXI,IV.jpg)

Netherlands:  Fokker D.XXI

(http://kits.kitreview.com/images/ab3201preview_cover.jpg)

France:  Morane-Saulnier M.S.406, Potez 63

(http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/artwork/artwk_sm79_shigeo_koike.jpg)

Italy: Fiat BR.20, Savoia-Marchetti SM.79

(http://www.modellbau-universe.de/uploadfiles/original/rs_72148.jpg)

Germany:  Heinkel He 112, Focke-Wulf Fw 58, Junkers Ju 86, Messerschmitt Bf 108

(http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120214012050/turtledove/images/thumb/e/ea/Los3.jpg/500px-Los3.jpg)

Poland: PZL.23 Karaś, PZL P.24, PZL.37 Łoś

(http://www.arturmodel.cz/fotocache/bigorig/SPH72260.jpg)

USA:  Curtiss P-36/Hawk 75, Douglas 8A, Martin 139, Seversky P-35


All these aircraft were pretty advanced and enjoyed some level of export success.  A lot of other types were less advanced or post-1936.

Cheers,

Logan
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: elmayerle on November 01, 2013, 10:27:59 AM
The thought occurs to me that, if they are already familiar with the Demon, the Hurricane, which uses a lot of similar construction techniques, at least in the Hurricane Mk.1, would be a suitable follow-on.  You might see Australian developments that were only paper projects back at Kingston-on-Thames.
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: jcf on November 01, 2013, 01:23:34 PM
The 'similar construction techniques' remained throughout the entire life of the Hurricane design.  ;D
All Hurricane fuselages used the Hawker tube construction.
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: Empty Handed on November 08, 2013, 07:32:35 AM
I find the idea of a CAC built P-35/AT-12 fighter/trainer combo quite intriguing, so.......

(http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5516/10733495203_f4ff1213d6_b.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/80037838@N03/10733495203/)
CAC CA-10 Murungal RAAF (http://www.flickr.com/photos/80037838@N03/10733495203/#) by mtpalmer1 (http://www.flickr.com/people/80037838@N03/), on Flickr
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: GTX_Admin on November 09, 2013, 02:18:38 AM
I do too!  Lovely profile!! :) :)
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: elmayerle on November 09, 2013, 03:05:12 AM
That's gorgeous.  I can't wait to see what other variations evolve in Australia.  Perhaps a scouting floatplane derived from Seversky's floatplane efforts?  For fighter evolution, I could definitely see the P-35-->XP-41 development with better retracting gear, followed by upgrades to something equivalent to the P-43.  Beyond that, I can't help but wonder if you might see something similar to a Re.2001 with an Allison or Merlin engine as the next step or if they'd go with a more powerful radial.
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: Empty Handed on November 09, 2013, 03:32:50 AM
Thanks.

As to where to next, my tuppence worth would be to avoid the Kartveli route (as much as I like that route) and probably go more in the direction of the Reggianes, with a bit of historical Boomerang/CA-15 thrown in.

As to engines, since Australia had a relationship with P&W and Bristol IOTL, I'd try as much as possible to preserve that, which equates to using radials. I think the inline Reggianes were something of an abberation necessitated by Italy's poor selection of powerplants and the DB engines being the only game in town. That portly airframe doesn't really lend itself to an inline (although the Re.2001 bears it well  :-* ).

Also, as I understand it, Australia didn't produce Merlins for it's Mustangs (but did post-war for the Lincolns - please correct me). So for these reasons, I'd avoid an inline and go with something of a XP-41/Re.2000 clone with a turbo-charged R-1830 or a Hercules and then maybe a single-seat bubble-top Re.2003 with a R-2800 (assuming availability of the latter).

Sorry for the quasi-rambling! Any thoughts??
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: GTX_Admin on November 09, 2013, 03:39:03 AM
I am working on three variations to this scenario.

Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: Empty Handed on November 09, 2013, 03:45:49 AM
Ack! Random thought alert. Rather than developing the CA-15, CAC develops the lightweight (Merlin) Mustangs, the XP-51F/G as a direct Boomerang successor....
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: GTX_Admin on November 09, 2013, 04:03:20 AM
Another variation:  The Lockheed flavour...

Start in the late 30s with the Lockheed Model 14 Super Electra - initially as a modern airliner type but also transitioning into the Hudson during the war.  Also go with the hot new P-38 Lightning as a long range, high performance RAAF fighter.   Later on transition the civilian side to also produce the Constellation before moving to the Lockheed L-188 Electra/P-3 "Hudson II".  The military side stays with the P-38 for a while but then jumps early into the jet world with the P-80/T-33, maybe even introduce the F-94 before moving to the F-104...
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: GTX_Admin on November 09, 2013, 05:30:23 AM
The Seversky/Republic Link:

Commencing in late '30s with joint production of licence built AT-12 Guardsman (as the CAC Wirraway) with a combat version based upon the 2PA two-seat fighter and fighter-bomber "Convoy Fighter" variant  (maybe even with a couple of the float equipped 2PA-As).  This is followed a little later by the P-35 (as the CAC Boomerang) - the idea being to first develop the production skills etc on the trainer which also is more useful to the RAAF initially to build up the necessary pilot base.  Remembering also that the two seat combat versions would also be seen as potentially more useful.

AT-12 Guardsman:
(http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7096/7308944252_327137cb22_o.jpg)

2PA:
(http://1000aircraftphotos.com/Contributions/HornDavid/9342.jpg)

2PA-A:
(http://www.aviastar.org/pictures/usa/seversky_2pa_1.jpg)

Later on, plan on going to the XP-41/P-43 developments but perhaps after toying with the idea, decide to skip to the P-47.  Maybe even have the P-47s as the CAC CA-15/CA-18?  These, probably in the developed P-47M/N variants serve the RAAF post war including in Korea.

P-47N:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Republic_P-47N-5_three_ship_formation_061020-F-1234P-037.jpg)

Coincident with this, maybe have the XF-12 Rainbow built as a post war airliner/military recon/surveillance bird so as to give a non-pure military product line.  Possibly also the RC-3 Seabee as a post war attempt to enter the general aviation sector.

Rainbow:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/Republic_XF-12_Rainbow.jpg)

Seabee:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/RepublicSeabee01.jpg)

Enter the jet age with the F-84 including the F-84F as the equivalent to the real world CAC Sabre. 

F-84F:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c4/F-84F_Thunderstreak.jpg/800px-F-84F_Thunderstreak.jpg)

This is then followed ultimately by the F-105 Thunderchief instead of the Canberra (maybe have the RAAF simply lease some Canberras or equivalent in the meantime).

F-105:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/Republic_F-105D-30-RE_%28SN_62-4234%29_in_flight_with_full_bomb_load_060901-F-1234S-013.jpg/800px-Republic_F-105D-30-RE_%28SN_62-4234%29_in_flight_with_full_bomb_load_060901-F-1234S-013.jpg)
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: Volkodav on November 09, 2013, 05:56:10 AM
Still like the Hawker idea, Hurricane /Henley followed by Typhoons and maybe a two place attack bomber Typhoon, Tempest, Fury, Hawk, P.1081, Hunter.
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: elmayerle on November 09, 2013, 03:36:27 PM
Another variation:  The Lockheed flavour...

Start in the late 30s with the Lockheed Model 14 Super Electra - initially as a modern airliner type but also transitioning into the Hudson during the war.  Also go with the hot new P-38 Lightning as a long range, high performance RAAF fighter.   Later on transition the civilian side to also produce the Constellation before moving to the Lockheed L-188 Electra/P-3 "Hudson II".  The military side stays with the P-38 for a while but then jumps early into the jet world with the P-80/T-33, maybe even introduce the F-94 before moving to the F-104...
Perhaps an intermediate heavy jet fighter crossing a twin-engined F-80 concept with the Lightning "Swordfish" testbed (that longer center nacelle was definitely cleaner and less "draggy").  With two seats and a bubble canopy instead of that framed one, it could be a good interim heavy jet fighter.
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: GTX_Admin on November 10, 2013, 01:43:01 AM
Not quite sure what you mean Evan.  Would such a creation be twin boomed?
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: elmayerle on November 10, 2013, 02:09:22 AM
Not quite sure what you mean Evan.  Would such a creation be twin boomed?

Yep, since the engines would be at the rear of the center nacelle, close to the cg.  You might need to go with the elevated horizontal of the studied floatplane to clear the exhausts.  Think of it as a Lightning-derived straight-wing version of the Sea Vixen with tandem seating and a generation, or two, earlier tech for the engines (though a couple Beryl's might work well here).
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: GTX_Admin on February 18, 2018, 03:55:43 AM
Something I originally posted elsewhere but is probably relevant to this thread:  the info below is just the bare bones and needs to be better developed and filled out.  It was all originally inspired by this image by Clave:

(http://www.clavework-graphics.co.uk/aircraft/fantasy_2/F187_Fw190A8_RAAF.jpg)

Basically, it starts with the 1936 RAAF  technical mission to Europe.  In this spin, the team visit Focke-Wulf Flugzeugbau AG where Lawrence Wackett befriends Kurt Tank (both being decorated WWI veterans and highly capable aircraft designers).  Impressed with the innovation of Kurt Tank's designs (especially the emphasis on maintainability and ruggedness), Lawrence Wackett (and the team) recommend that the RAAF pursue a licence to produce the Focke-Wulf Fw 56 Stösser advanced trainer with possible extension to also build the Focke-Wulf Fw 159 fighter which shared components.  This further develops into a full partnership between Focke-Wulf and CAC with Kurt Tank taking up a proposal to emigrate to Australia to work with his friend Lawrence Wackett.

Always a keen business man, Lawrence Wackett is especially intrigued to rapidly build Australia's (and CAC's) aerospace capability, not only for military platforms but more so for civilian.  Of course, WWII eventually leads to a focus on combat aircraft.  This eventually centres upon the following designs:

CA-1 Wirraway advanced trainer (aka FW-56):

(https://www.aviarmor.net/aww2/_photo_trainer/_ger/fw56/fw56_d1.jpg)

CA-2 Currawong medium sized trainer/transport/liason/medium sized airliner aircraft (aka FW-158):

(http://i72.servimg.com/u/f72/12/32/28/62/fw_58_10.gif)

CA-3 Bilyara long range airliner/WII maritime patrol aircraft (aka FW-200):

(http://airliner.narod.ru/airliners1935-41/fw200-3d.gif)

CA-12 Boomerang (aka FW-190A series)
CA-14 Improved Boomerang  (aka TA-152)
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: Klown on June 09, 2020, 04:10:36 PM
@GTX Admin - Did you also do a profile for that FW-190 in foliage over light blue scheme?
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: GTX_Admin on June 10, 2020, 02:49:43 AM
@GTX Admin - Did you also do a profile for that FW-190 in foliage over light blue scheme?

Errr...which one is that?
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: Old Wombat on June 10, 2020, 10:06:00 AM
@GTX Admin - Did you also do a profile for that FW-190 in foliage over light blue scheme?

Errr...which one is that?

He means Clave's FW.190 that you used in your post above.

As in: Did you (Clave) do a version of this in the Aussie foliage over sky blue with white bits scheme?
Title: Re: A different slant on CAC and thus the RAAF in WWII and beyond
Post by: Geoff on June 22, 2020, 11:38:36 PM
I like the idea of Re-2000s and Capronis initially. With a radial engine Hurricane coming along a bit later. Or if Italy does not enter WW2 maybe Re-2002s, ( OK unlikely ) or reengine the Re-2000s.