It was interesting that Wackett basically pre-empted the Lancaster IV / Lincoln and also was pretty spot on about US built Liberators being suitable for the RAAF. They had initially been sent to look at twin engined medium bombers but determined that there were no new ones available with all existing types actually being attack aircraft rather than bombers with the Beaufighter, Mosquito and, potentially, CA-11 covering that range of missions quite adequately. Still the A-26C (later B-26) would probably have served quite well.
Apparently up to twenty four Tudors were meant to be built locally as well as the Lincolns with 12 Tudor IIs actually being ordered. It is interesting that the government of the day were under the impression that the Lancaster / Lincoln was equivalent or superior to the B-29 were Wackett was more pragmatic in that he believed Australian industry at that point would not have been capable of fabricating its pressurized fuselage.
The post war plan for the RAAF was quite interesting, 16 squadrons, made up of 3 heavy bomber, 2 long range fighter, 1 heavy bomber / reconnaissance, 1 tactical reconnaissance, 4 interceptor (citizen), 1 target towing, 1 survey, 1 search and rescue, and 2 transport. The Lancaster / Lincoln, Tudor, or York and possibly Shackleton could have covered off 6, possibly 7 (including SAR) of the squadrons for quite a substantial production run. It would be interesting to know what the RAAFs thoughts were for the different squadrons. i.e. was the Mustang the long range fighter (is this what the DH Seahornet was evaluated for?) or the interceptor (perhaps this was initially the Spitfire) and where did the Mosquito and Beaufighter fit in all this?