Author Topic: C-141 Starlifter and related proposals  (Read 14177 times)

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
C-141 Starlifter and related proposals
« on: April 03, 2013, 02:55:37 PM »
I thought the C-141s had fatigue issues.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2020, 11:58:18 AM by jcf »
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Re: C-141 Starlifter and related proposals
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2013, 03:11:53 PM »
If you have that recollection, it is likely so.
Without 1/72 styrene C-141 available,,,  my bringing it up is irrelevent anyway - oops  :-[
« Last Edit: January 04, 2020, 11:58:36 AM by jcf »

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2013, 03:26:12 PM »
 I may be wrong...
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2013, 08:58:25 PM »
If you have that recollection, it is likely so.
Without 1/72 styrene C-141 available,,,  my bringing it up is irrelevent anyway - oops  :-[

Combat Models do the A and B in styrene Bill, --- that's vacuform styrene   ;D  They also do a fairly good resin detail sets for most of their vacuforms.

Got one of each in the stash ---  As an aside, I found that the C-141A fuselage just happens to be about the same size to a C-135.  I've been thinking of a high winged C-135 as a Boeing competitor using the engine nacelles from the 141

Offline Daryl J.

  • Assures us he rarely uses model glue in dentistry
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2013, 12:23:18 AM »
Yes.  Fatigue issues in the 141's; have read that multiple places prior to the advent of the general availability of this here interwebs. 

Nice firebomber!
kwyxdxLg5T

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2013, 02:04:11 AM »
Got one of each in the stash ---  As an aside, I found that the C-141A fuselage just happens to be about the same size to a C-135.  I've been thinking of a high winged C-135 as a Boeing competitor using the engine nacelles from the 141
Of course, that also suggests the possibility of a KC-141.

Just a thought, a CILOP'd or new-build C-141C with CFM56 engines and the addition of a refueling probe in addtion to the flying boom receptacle.

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2013, 04:14:14 AM »
The above posts were split off from the A-10 thread.  Now continue on your way...

All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline dy031101

  • Yuri Fanboy and making cute stuff practical- at least that's the plan anyway
  • Prefers Guns And Tanks Over Swords And Magic
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2013, 09:25:57 AM »
Pesudo-bomber equipped with improved avionics and armed with MOAB in its cargo hold?
Forget about his bow and arrows- why wait until that sparrow has done his deed when I can just bury him right now 'cause I'm sick and tired of hearing why he wants to have his way with the cock robin!?

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2013, 10:05:50 AM »
How about some non-USA operators?
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2013, 10:42:33 AM »
Pesudo-bomber equipped with improved avionics and armed with MOAB in its cargo hold?

Thinking that would be next gen MOAB built without B-52 bomb bay size constraints.  KaaBooom !

Offline dy031101

  • Yuri Fanboy and making cute stuff practical- at least that's the plan anyway
  • Prefers Guns And Tanks Over Swords And Magic
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #10 on: April 04, 2013, 10:50:08 AM »
Thinking that would be next gen MOAB built without B-52 bomb bay size constraints.  KaaBooom !

And here was I thinking that MOAB wasn't built for B-52 bomb bay to being with...... ;D
Forget about his bow and arrows- why wait until that sparrow has done his deed when I can just bury him right now 'cause I'm sick and tired of hearing why he wants to have his way with the cock robin!?

Offline Daryl J.

  • Assures us he rarely uses model glue in dentistry
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2013, 10:52:39 AM »
While it's an opinion only, Herge could have had Tintin ride with a diamond smuggling Starlifter crew out of Africa to Antwerp.  MarolsAir markings or some such thing.
kwyxdxLg5T

Offline finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2013, 10:59:05 AM »
Thinking that would be next gen MOAB built without B-52 bomb bay size constraints.  KaaBooom !

And here was I thinking that MOAB wasn't built for B-52 bomb bay to being with...... ;D

You  be correct.  30 feet long with a diameter of 40.5 inches and delivered by C-130.

Offline dy031101

  • Yuri Fanboy and making cute stuff practical- at least that's the plan anyway
  • Prefers Guns And Tanks Over Swords And Magic
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2013, 11:23:38 AM »
Thinking that would be next gen MOAB built without B-52 bomb bay size constraints.  KaaBooom !


Nonetheless, your mention of B-52 inspired me to think...... a C-141-based "Old Dog" (the only good thing out of Dale Brown's sky cowboy novels), armed with either MOABs or cruise missile pallets?
Forget about his bow and arrows- why wait until that sparrow has done his deed when I can just bury him right now 'cause I'm sick and tired of hearing why he wants to have his way with the cock robin!?

Offline AGRA

  • Took the opportunity to tease us with a RAAF F-82
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #14 on: April 04, 2013, 11:27:31 AM »
How about some non-USA operators?

RAAF wanted to buy six back in the late 60s and by the time Treasury signed of on it Lockheed had closed the production line. RAAF then said OK we'll buy 707s but by the time the rest of the Govt. caught up to them there was withdrawal from Vietnam, subsequent draw down and they didn't the aircraft until the 80s. Anyway RAAF C-141s is like C-17s 40 years earlier.

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #15 on: April 04, 2013, 11:45:11 AM »
There's a techno-thriller out there that has ASAT's kicked out the back of a C-141 in order to take out a Soviet constellation of laser-armed satellites that were controlling access to the orbitals.  As I remember the details, the satellites were in a highly elliptical orbit giving increased loiter time over the northern hemisphere but coming in just above the atmosphere over the South Pole.  The C-141 staged out of Chile to shoot down these satellites.  Sorry, I don't remember the name of the novel nor the author.

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #16 on: April 04, 2013, 01:56:56 PM »
How about some non-USA operators?

RAAF wanted to buy six back in the late 60s and by the time Treasury signed of on it Lockheed had closed the production line. RAAF then said OK we'll buy 707s but by the time the rest of the Govt. caught up to them there was withdrawal from Vietnam, subsequent draw down and they didn't the aircraft until the 80s. Anyway RAAF C-141s is like C-17s 40 years earlier.

Interesting...
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline M.A.D

  • Also likes a bit of arse...
  • Wrote a great story about a Christmas Air Battle
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #17 on: April 04, 2013, 05:51:36 PM »
How about some non-USA operators?

RAAF wanted to buy six back in the late 60s and by the time Treasury signed of on it Lockheed had closed the production line. RAAF then said OK we'll buy 707s but by the time the rest of the Govt. caught up to them there was withdrawal from Vietnam, subsequent draw down and they didn't the aircraft until the 80s. Anyway RAAF C-141s is like C-17s 40 years earlier.

Interesting...

I concur GTX!!

Is this 'what if' or real world??
If real world, can I ask for your reference please? For I was oblivious to the RAAF (let alone the Australian Government) having any interest to such a capable transport aircraft bar the Hercules!

M.A.D

Offline AGRA

  • Took the opportunity to tease us with a RAAF F-82
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #18 on: April 04, 2013, 06:05:40 PM »
Is this 'what if' or real world??
If real world, can I ask for your reference please? For I was oblivious to the RAAF (let alone the Australian Government) having any interest to such a capable transport aircraft bar the Hercules!


Its real. Here is a general outline of events at that time including the C-5 option that was considered. This is not the only source but its the first I can put my hands on at the moment. Its a few beers later moment here on my end...

http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1967/1967%20-%200305.html?search=raaf c-141

Offline Volkodav

  • Counts rivits with his abacus...
  • Much older now...but procrastinating about it
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #19 on: April 04, 2013, 06:20:23 PM »
I remember reading something about it in a 1960 something bound edition of flight magazine they had in the uni library.  The justification mentioned in the story was the need for something more suitable for casualty evacuation from Vietnam.  Another story in a later edition discussed the C-5 option and the concern that, so large was the number of troops it could carry, the loss of s single aircraft would result in the deaths of a large percentage of our regular infantry.

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #20 on: April 04, 2013, 07:29:01 PM »
Some RAAF C-141s would look cool.
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline AGRA

  • Took the opportunity to tease us with a RAAF F-82
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #21 on: April 04, 2013, 08:10:14 PM »
They could have used the C-141s for the camo pattern trial on the Caribous: green, red and tan wrap arounds. Plus the hivis white tops, AAD support fanta can and a Roulette support aircraft...

Offline Scooterman

  • Professional A-4 Stalker...and stealer of Rule 3.
  • Even his underwear is embroided with Skyhawks...
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #22 on: April 04, 2013, 11:37:38 PM »
<has head in closet of doom digging out 1/200 kits>

Offline Geoff

  • Newly Joined - Welcome me!
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #23 on: April 05, 2013, 12:17:20 AM »
AWACS in place of 707s?

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Lockheed C-141 Starlifter
« Reply #24 on: April 05, 2013, 02:07:22 AM »
They could have used the C-141s for the camo pattern trial on the Caribous: green, red and tan wrap arounds. Plus the hivis white tops, AAD support fanta can and a Roulette support aircraft...

Quick someone - do some profiles of these...please!!!
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.