Author Topic: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits  (Read 5379 times)

Offline ysi_maniac

  • I will die understanding not this world
Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« on: August 28, 2012, 12:43:35 AM »
Comparing Testors/Italeri AH-1W 1/72 and Hobbycraft AH-1Z; I saw that this last kit's fuselage is about an inch shorter  ::)
Is this correct?

Offline jschmus

  • Aims to please.
Re: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2012, 02:01:15 AM »
There's a pretty detailed review of the kit here:
http://www.scale-rotors.com/kit/artikel.php?id=5220

If it were me, I'd hold out for a release by another manufacturer.
"Life isn’t divided into genres. It’s a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."-Alan Moore

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2012, 02:33:50 AM »
I've got the Hobbycraft Zulu too in the stash although I haven't done a comparison with the Italeri Whisky.  This might be a bit on the side but I've noticed that some Hobbycraft kits are not 1/72 scale when they say it is, I've found that with their 1/72 CF-105 kit which seems to be actually 1/75 scale and this might be another.  As I own the moulds to the Victoria Products CF-105 kit which is supposed to be the best kit of it, I've been able to do a very good study of the two kits. 

Offline jcf

  • Global Moderator
  • Turn that Gila-copter down!
Re: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2012, 01:02:53 PM »
Hobbycraft never actually made the tooling for the kits released under their name, and in later days
they were just issuing reboxed sprues from folks like Zhengdefu ... and most of those kits are truly
crappy.

As to the actual Zulu, it's the same size as the rest of the family.

http://www.bellhelicopter.com/MungoBlobs/68/132/EN_AH-1Z_PocketGuide.pdf
“Conspiracy theory’s got to be simple.
Sense doesn’t come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated shit
actually is than they ever are about
whatever’s supposed to be behind the
conspiracy.”
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

Offline ysi_maniac

  • I will die understanding not this world
Re: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2012, 10:22:16 AM »
Hobbycraft model seems to be 1/82 in fact ::)

Offline jschmus

  • Aims to please.
Re: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2012, 06:50:50 AM »
Perhaps we could interest someone in making a conversion kit for the Italeri W.  The major components would be the extra rotor blades, the FLIR turret and the modified exhausts.
"Life isn’t divided into genres. It’s a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."-Alan Moore

Offline ChernayaAkula

  • Was left standing in front when everyone else took one step back...
  • Global Moderator
  • Putting the "pro" in procrastination since...?
Re: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2012, 10:54:35 AM »
Perhaps we could interest someone in making a conversion kit for the Italeri W.  The major components would be the extra rotor blades, the FLIR turret and the modified exhausts.

I'm afraid it's not as simple as that. On top of the EO turret, rotor blades and different exhausts, there's the new stub wings, much bigger "doghouse", modified forward fuselage (bigger "hamster" cheeks), different stabilizers farther back on the tailboom. On the outside, it's pretty much a new aircraft. About the only things you could use are the canopy, M197 turret, engine air intakes and the skids (which even have different support struts).

I'd love to see an all-new AH-1Z in 1/72. Hell, any new AH-1 in 1/72, really. 
Cheers,
Moritz

"The appropriate response to reality is to go insane!"

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2012, 06:48:55 AM »
Perhaps we could interest someone in making a conversion kit for the Italeri W.  The major components would be the extra rotor blades, the FLIR turret and the modified exhausts.
The exhausts I could get information on, I even know who the designer was for that mod.  There was also a study for upturned exhausts but nothing beyond the testbed was done as the Zulu's mods were sufficient.  Those of you with a kit of the HIRS-equipped UH-60 or SH-60S can clone the inner portion of that exhaust for the Zulu.

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2013, 03:24:13 PM »
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline upnorth

  • Distorting a reality near you.
  • You want maple syrup on that Macchi?
Re: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2013, 04:15:29 PM »


I'd love to see an all-new AH-1Z in 1/72. Hell, any new AH-1 in 1/72, really.

I have heard rumblings here and there that AZ Models has plans for a 1/72 line of AH-1 types. No idea of planned release dates or such details.

There's no way to tell from the AZ web site as they discontinued their future releases section some time ago.
Pickled Wings, A Blog for Preserved Aircraft:
http://pickledwings.com/

Beyond Prague, Traveling the Rest of the Czech Republic:
http://beyondprague.net/

Offline AGRA

  • Took the opportunity to tease us with a RAAF F-82
Re: Comparing 2 AH-1 kits
« Reply #10 on: April 06, 2013, 05:05:07 PM »
I discovered a new bit of history today:  Australia did actually order a small number of AH-1Gs back in 1970 but then cancelled it in 1971.


Another casulty of the post Vietnam drawdown. And it wasn't just the AH-1Gs but also a lot more UH-1Hs and the Army wanted about twice the number of Kiowas they eventually got. Interesting thing about the AH-1Gs was they were to replace the Bushranger Hueys allowing the entire Huey force to be slicks. So the RAAF was going to raise No. 8 Squadron to be a second tactical helicopter squadron alongside No. 9 with each having a Bushranger flight of four flying AH-1Gs.

What-if-wise the RAAF could have come out of the Vietnam War with the squadron of 6 C-141s, the two large tactical helo sqns (20-30 UH-1Hs and 4-5 AH-1Gs each) and the 30-40 lead in fighter trainer, close air support aircraft (afterburning adour powered, delta wing, twin 30mm Adens in the nose CAC CA-31s?). Not to mention have gone into it with 36 A-5Bs!
« Last Edit: April 06, 2013, 05:07:14 PM by AGRA »

Offline Daryl J.

  • Assures us he rarely uses model glue in dentistry
AH-1Z
« Reply #11 on: April 08, 2013, 01:45:21 PM »
A rotor with an ultra-low sound profile would serve the chopper well methinks.
kwyxdxLg5T