Beyond The Sprues

Modelling => Completed GBs => Group and Themed Builds => The 2016 Annual "Non-Military" GB => Topic started by: Acree on June 15, 2016, 02:33:00 PM

Title: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: Acree on June 15, 2016, 02:33:00 PM
Just a quick response to the idea of a re-engined F7F found here: http://beyondthesprues.com/Forum/index.php?topic=6438.15. (http://beyondthesprues.com/Forum/index.php?topic=6438.15.)  Though I thought a Griffon would be sexier looking (though perhaps less beastly effective) than an R-3350s or R-4360s.  Anyway, just quick and fun...
 
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: GTX_Admin on June 15, 2016, 03:17:18 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: Tophe on June 15, 2016, 06:31:32 PM
Our friend ericr would love these colours...
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: KiwiZac on June 16, 2016, 05:28:45 AM
Sleek and elegant, I like it!


....it's almost as if you guys know I've been trying to resist buying more models...
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: Acree on June 16, 2016, 07:08:28 AM
You may be safe... I just checked (for my own purposes) and there don't seem to be many (read: any) F7F kits out there right now. 
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: kitnut617 on June 16, 2016, 08:21:49 AM
Acree, you sketch looks great  :) but just a suggestion. The Griffon nacelle arrangement for the Spitfire is a bit small for a F7F, might I suggest using the nacelle from a Firefly instead  ---  it's a bit bigger in dimensions so would fit the F7F nacelle better

like this below (the nearside nacelle in this photo)
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: Acree on June 16, 2016, 08:37:35 AM
I'll give that a try when I have time.  Is that nacelle from a Firefly Mk 5?
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: kitnut617 on June 17, 2016, 08:43:40 AM
Yup! from the Airfix Mk.V. Just happens to fit the F-82 quite well too --
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: Acree on June 17, 2016, 03:40:53 PM
OK, here's the Gryphon-cat with the Firefly V engine installation.

The second profile shows a more-radically modified racer, with clipped wings, small bubble canopy and new swept vertical tail.  Enjoy!
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: kitnut617 on June 18, 2016, 07:53:31 AM
There you go   :) :) :) :) :) :)  lovely.  Just another couple of comments, first one, you don't need the air intake under the cowling, the air intake is just behind the spinner which also feeds air to the supercharger intercooler ( you can just see it in the pic of the F-82) and second, now you need some radiators   ;) The F-82 already has radiator ducts in place, I think your Gryphon-cat would need leading edge radiators in between the nacelles and fuselage.

You could go as far as using counter rotating Sea Fury props  (they're about the same diameter as the R-2800 props the Tigercat uses)

like theses ----  although I'm building 'contra-rotating' props here

Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: Acree on June 18, 2016, 12:27:57 PM
OK, Kit, here's my final shot at it...

Superfluous scoop removed, leading-edge radiators installed (DH Hornet-style).  Five-bladed, counter-rotating props installed, but from Seafire, not Sea Fury.  I also made a few minor detail changes to the Super Gryphon-Cat modified version. 

I doubt if I'll try this in plastic because I can't find an F7F kit AND the cost would be very high, needing two Firefly donors...  Would be fun, though!
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: Tophe on June 18, 2016, 01:03:10 PM
From "beautiful", turning "very beautiful"... :-*
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: perttime on June 18, 2016, 04:56:17 PM
Looks good. I think the slimmer engines improve pilot's visibility too.

A low but long bubble canopy would surely look good too: like the Rare Bear has.
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: kitnut617 on June 18, 2016, 07:54:03 PM

I doubt if I'll try this in plastic because I can't find an F7F kit AND the cost would be very high, needing two Firefly donors...

Yes, definitely looking very nice  ----  might even give it a shot in plastic myself.  And I just happen to be dropping the Firefly cowling into rubber as I have a couple of projects in mind for them  --------- I could end up with a few extras ---  ;)
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: Acree on June 19, 2016, 12:11:09 PM
Kit, if you happen to accidentally make a few extras, I'd gladly pay the cost of materials plus a few hundred miles' postage southward...  ;)

Since Perttime requested a "RareBear-like canopy," how about we go one step further and make The Gryphon-cat a stablemate of RareBear, known as ScatCat?  Here she is with a new canopy, and paint job, and I think she looks WAY better.  What do you think?
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: GTX_Admin on June 19, 2016, 12:37:24 PM
Oh yeah!! :)
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: Kerick on June 19, 2016, 02:48:02 PM
I couldn't help thinking of Shackleton props and cowlings.
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: Acree on June 19, 2016, 02:58:56 PM
I don't know - those big chin radiators just don't say "air racer" to me - maybe 'cause I'm not English?  I'll try it out in a coupe of days and see. 
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: kitnut617 on June 19, 2016, 07:46:06 PM
I don't know - those big chin radiators just don't say "air racer" to me - maybe 'cause I'm not English?  I'll try it out in a coupe of days and see.

I know what you're saying there Acree, but they're actually quite efficient drag wise and would solve where to put the radiators.  Interesting aside but connected to your comment.
I read an article a few years ago in one of my Air-Britain quarterlies, it was about some air tests on a Mosquito which had been fitted with Lancaster nacelles. The Air Ministry had wanted to standardize engine packages so had instructed De Havilland to install them on a Mosquito, with the original leading edge radiator openings closed off using a section of leading edge shape.  To the amazement of everyone involved, the Mosquito was only about 3 mph slower than a standard Mosquito. However, De Havilland was having none of it ---

Mind you there was this design, which was one of the fastest piston-engined aircraft of the time -
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: kitnut617 on June 19, 2016, 08:12:55 PM
Kit, if you happen to accidentally make a few extras, I'd gladly pay the cost of materials plus a few hundred miles' postage southward...  ;)

They would be in 1/72 scale ---
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: The Big Gimper on June 19, 2016, 08:15:54 PM
I don't know - those big chin radiators just don't say "air racer" to me - maybe 'cause I'm not English?  I'll try it out in a coupe of days and see.


I know what you're saying there Acree, but they're actually quite efficient drag wise and would solve where to put the radiators.  Interesting aside but connected to your comment.
I read an article a few years ago in one of my Air-Britain quarterlies, it was about some air tests on a Mosquito which had been fitted with Lancaster nacelles. The Air Ministry had wanted to standardize engine packages so had instructed De Havilland to install them on a Mosquito, with the original leading edge radiator openings closed off using a section of leading edge shape.  To the amazement of everyone involved, the Mosquito was only about 3 mph slower than a standard Mosquito. However, De Havilland was having none of it ---

Mind you there was this design, which was one of the fastest piston-engined aircraft of the time -


Or the XP-72.

(http://forum.warthunder.com/uploads/monthly_09_2014/post-228881-0-46873600-1410207160.jpg)
(http://forum.warthunder.com/uploads/monthly_09_2014/post-228881-0-34878000-1410207150.jpg)

From the Wikipedia page (subject to verification):

Note: Test pilot Tom Bellinger stated flatly that no flights ever exceeded 500 mph. The dash 13 engine was not supercharged. With the planned but never installed dash 19 engine (with a remote supercharger) rated at 3,650 HP at 25,000 ft. (3,000 HP at sea level) a top speed of 504 mph at approximately 25,000 feet was expected. Planned further development of the dash 19 engine was expected to yield approximately 4,000 hp and a speed of 540 mph at 25,000 ft.

Other sources put the top speed at just over 500 MPH.
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: The Big Gimper on June 19, 2016, 08:21:29 PM
I couldn't help thinking of Shackleton props and cowlings.


Slight deviation here but the Shackleton props and cowlings are "universal":

(http://i1139.photobucket.com/albums/n547/CF-101B/Modeling%202014/IMG_1613.jpg) (http://s1139.photobucket.com/user/CF-101B/media/Modeling%202014/IMG_1613.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: GTX_Admin on June 20, 2016, 03:08:38 AM

I read an article a few years ago in one of my Air-Britain quarterlies, it was about some air tests on a Mosquito which had been fitted with Lancaster nacelles. The Air Ministry had wanted to standardize engine packages so had instructed De Havilland to install them on a Mosquito, with the original leading edge radiator openings closed off using a section of leading edge shape. 

That would be interesting to model...if only to upset some purists. >:D
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: kitnut617 on June 20, 2016, 08:30:15 AM

I read an article a few years ago in one of my Air-Britain quarterlies, it was about some air tests on a Mosquito which had been fitted with Lancaster nacelles. The Air Ministry had wanted to standardize engine packages so had instructed De Havilland to install them on a Mosquito, with the original leading edge radiator openings closed off using a section of leading edge shape. 

That would be interesting to model...if only to upset some purists. >:D

There was a couple of photos of it that went with the article too --
Title: Re: Grumman Gryphon-cat
Post by: perttime on June 20, 2016, 02:29:28 PM
"RareBear-like canopy," how about we go one step further and make The Gryphon-cat a stablemate of RareBear, known as ScatCat?  Here she is with a new canopy, and paint job, and I think she looks WAY better.  What do you think?
That works  :-*