Author Topic: Participative thread - The end  (Read 41341 times)

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #25 on: March 18, 2012, 10:11:06 PM »
I`d like to see this land on the present day USS Monterey...  ;D

Come to think of it, I`d like to see this land on the USS Monterey of World War 2....  ;)

It really takes a pilot (and RIO) with nerves of steel to do that ;)

Thank you for your participation

Offline Weaver

  • Skyhawk stealer and violator of Panthers, with designs on a Cougar and a Tiger too
  • Chaos Engineer & Evangelistic Agnostic
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #26 on: March 18, 2012, 11:43:08 PM »
The missile on the aft fuselage station is wierd: not a Sparrow or an AMRAAM, but I can't place what it is.... ???
"I have described nothing but what I saw myself, or learned from others" - Thucydides

"I've jazzed mine up a bit" - Spike Milligan

"I'm a general specialist," - Harry Purvis in Tales from the White Hart by Arthur C. Clarke

Twitter: @hws5mp
Minds.com: @HaroldWeaverSmith

aeroplaneDriver

  • Guest
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #27 on: March 19, 2012, 12:00:04 AM »
The Horizontal stabilizer is the wrong shape...it looks like it's carrying Lima sidewinders about 15 years too early...I may be wrong but the front seat looks more like an ESCAPAC than a MB...back seat doesn't look right either, but cant tell what it looks like. 

This is fun!!


Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #28 on: March 19, 2012, 12:16:34 AM »
The missile on the aft fuselage station is wierd: not a Sparrow or an AMRAAM, but I can't place what it is.... ???

Yes, it is a real-world aam...
Maybe you need to look outside the USA  ;)

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #29 on: March 19, 2012, 12:23:04 AM »
The Horizontal stabilizer is the wrong shape

You are right; the horizontal stabilizer is taken from the F-4 (HL) version (not build) intended for the Royal Navy

...it looks like it's carrying Lima sidewinders about 15 years too early...

Yes it does; a case of very advanced weaponry ;)

I may be wrong but the front seat looks more like an ESCAPAC than a MB...back seat doesn't look right either, but cant tell what it looks like. 
You are right: the ejection seats are not what they were supposed to be; but they are not ESCAPAC; neither of them are from the USA or from the UK...


This is fun!!

My feelings exactly; please keep discovering new errors :)

aeroplaneDriver

  • Guest
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #30 on: March 19, 2012, 02:44:07 AM »
OK...next batch...


The rear AAM being discussed looks like maybe a Meteor?  Either way it appears to be mounted on the fuselage instead of the semi-recessed belly station. 

The US Navy never use "U.S. NAVY" on markings, just "NAVY".

There appears to be some sort of APU exhaust or some other vent that doesn't belong just above the engine exhaust. 


Can I get a closeup of the canopy and forward fuselage area?

 :D

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #31 on: March 19, 2012, 03:54:23 AM »

The rear AAM being discussed looks like maybe a Meteor?  Either way it appears to be mounted on the fuselage instead of the semi-recessed belly station. 

It is not an Meteor; the fact it appears mounted and not recessed is more of an non-intentional mistake by me (sorry). As for that AAM you might not be too far off (geographically speaking ;) )


The US Navy never use "U.S. NAVY" on markings, just "NAVY".

You are right


There appears to be some sort of APU exhaust or some other vent that doesn't belong just above the engine exhaust. 

You are right again

Can I get a closeup of the canopy and forward fuselage area?

I will provide a close-up on the entire aircraft, but not for now (sorry). There are some more errors i would like to see identify before I provide those close-ups (that will for sure make evident some other errors).
Please be a little patient and I will provide soon those close ups.
Many thanks for your participation :)

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #32 on: March 19, 2012, 04:08:38 AM »
There are still more than 15 errors to be found...
Some of them perhaps will only be discovered when the close-ups are provided, but other are still visible int he original image.

aeroplaneDriver

  • Guest
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #33 on: March 19, 2012, 04:24:53 AM »
OK, my last three, then someone else needs to have a go...

First...DUH!!  The missile in question is a Red Top!  I just noticed the forward fin visible. 

Also, just above the missile is a UK serial, looks like XR770..Lightning number to go with the Lightning missile?

Finally, the NACA duct ahead of "U.S. NAVY" doesnt belong. 


Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #34 on: March 19, 2012, 04:37:09 AM »
First...DUH!!  The missile in question is a Red Top!  I just noticed the forward fin visible. 

Right on!

Also, just above the missile is a UK serial, looks like XR770..Lightning number to go with the Lightning missile?

Right again. The Ligthning number goes well with the AAM, but that is not the only reason... there something else British in there... ;)

Finally, the NACA duct ahead of "U.S. NAVY" doesnt belong.

Right again.
Thanks for your participation: good observation skills.


aeroplaneDriver

  • Guest
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #35 on: March 19, 2012, 04:57:41 AM »
GOT IT! 

I knew there was something odd about the inboard tank...it's a Lightning OVERwing tank!  Right??

Now I'm really done!! 

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #36 on: March 19, 2012, 05:00:14 AM »
GOT IT! 

I knew there was something odd about the inboard tank...it's a Lightning OVERwing tank!  Right??

Now I'm really done!!

Yes it is!
But here more British elements in there... ;)
You can participate all you want; I am glad you do.
Thanks

Offline Slerski

  • The crazy French weapons specialist
  • Too... Much... Models... To... Rhhhaaaa !!
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #37 on: March 19, 2012, 05:36:52 AM »
The double "Ejection Seat" warning under the front cockpit belongs to a... Lightning maybe ?

And the radome doesn't look right to me
On the bench : Fw 190D - Ta 152H - Jet Fw 190 - Modernized SPAD XIII - French Stealth plane

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #38 on: March 19, 2012, 05:17:45 PM »
The double "Ejection Seat" warning under the front cockpit belongs to a... Lightning maybe ?

Right on. This is a signal used on the Lightnings.

And the radome doesn't look right to me

Yes, this radome is not of the tipical -B version either in shape nor in the reinforcing strips it has.

Thanks for participating :)

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #39 on: March 19, 2012, 10:52:05 PM »
Only more about 15 errors to identify ... ;)

aeroplaneDriver

  • Guest
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #40 on: March 19, 2012, 11:10:59 PM »
OK, so I did some pretty cursory research and only found 4 kills total by F-4Bs in '65....does that make the 4 kill markings on a single plane in 65 an error?


Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #41 on: March 20, 2012, 01:09:57 AM »
OK, so I did some pretty cursory research and only found 4 kills total by F-4Bs in '65....does that make the 4 kill markings on a single plane in 65 an error?

Yes, the kill markings are another error; either related to the year in question and also to the squadrons refered (the Grim Reapers and the Diamondbacks).
Very good.
Thansk for participating.
Almost there... just another 10 plus to go ;)

aeroplaneDriver

  • Guest
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #42 on: March 20, 2012, 02:08:41 AM »
The yellow "RESCUE" arrow pointing at the external canopy jettison is missing from the area near the slime light, and there should be a white "DANGER" stencil inside the red warning chevron in front of the intake. 


Offline Jeremak

  • Couch mastermind
  • One-person Alternate History Liberation Front
    • My DA: profiles respository, and more...
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #43 on: March 20, 2012, 03:11:18 AM »
That "rectangle", yellow position lights: aren't they introduced later than 1965?

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #44 on: March 20, 2012, 05:31:20 AM »
The yellow "RESCUE" arrow pointing at the external canopy jettison is missing from the area near the slime light,
and there should be a white "DANGER" stencil inside the red warning chevron in front of the intake.

You are right. Two less to find.

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #45 on: March 20, 2012, 05:34:27 AM »
That "rectangle", yellow position lights: aren't they introduced later than 1965?

You are right, but The Big Gimper had allready discovered that one (reply # 22).
 But you have a lot of others to find... ;)
Keep participating

aeroplaneDriver

  • Guest
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #46 on: March 20, 2012, 11:02:53 AM »
Damn JP, this is brutal!! But FUN!  Great thread!!   ;)

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #47 on: March 20, 2012, 04:53:40 PM »
Damn JP, this is brutal!! But FUN!  Great thread!!   ;)

Thanks, it has been a great fun for me also.
I am planning in putting in a bigger image of the aircraft.

Offline JP Vieira

  • Moderator
  • The Challenge Master!!!
    • What-If World
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #48 on: March 20, 2012, 11:49:02 PM »
Hello
here is a biggerr image; now lets find out the remaining errors: have fun



aeroplaneDriver

  • Guest
Re: Participative thread - identify the errors
« Reply #49 on: March 21, 2012, 01:00:04 AM »
Is that a cannon trough in front of the slime light? 

A camera port?

GIB seems to be wearing a US-type helmet or something

Wing Commander isnt a USN rank, though that could be an exchange pilot so not necessarily an error...

French-style canopy warning under the back seater.