Author Topic: ysi_maniac's drawings (Read 450156 times)

GTX_Admin · « **Reply #25 on:** March 13, 2012, 04:19:46 PM »

Oh yeah!!! :)

apophenia · « **Reply #26 on:** March 14, 2012, 06:50:26 AM »

ysi_maniac: Your Advanced Britannia is very nice! You can still recognize the Britannia but somehow the overall effect says 'Tupolev'

Imitation is flattery so ...
http://beyondthesprues.com/Forum/index.php?topic=351.msg12084#msg12084

elmayerle · « **Reply #27 on:** March 14, 2012, 10:24:45 AM »

How about an advanced Constellation/Starliner with turboprops, swept wings, and swept tail surfaces (retaining three verticals would be optional)?

finsrin · « **Reply #28 on:** March 14, 2012, 12:20:10 PM »

Quote from: elmayerle on March 14, 2012, 10:24:45 AM

How about an advanced Constellation/Starliner with turboprops, swept wings, and swept tail surfaces (retaining three verticals would be optional)?

Yes - Constellation would be super to do.. To still be a Constellation, three tails are required. A most destinctive feature.

JP Vieira · « **Reply #29 on:** March 14, 2012, 05:25:27 PM »

Love the advanced Britannia

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #30 on:** March 16, 2012, 11:04:07 PM »

Something must be done to address to engines issue. In the other hand remember that NK-12 was based in Jumo-022
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuznetsov_NK-12
http://hugojunkers.pytalhost.com/ju_jumo022_a1.htm

GTX_Admin · « **Reply #31 on:** March 17, 2012, 03:09:08 AM »

Hmmmm....

JP Vieira · « **Reply #32 on:** March 17, 2012, 05:49:38 PM »

Very interesting

upnorth · « **Reply #33 on:** March 17, 2012, 06:13:31 PM »

Very cool stuff all around.

Anything with contra-props is good in my book! :)

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #34 on:** March 26, 2012, 09:57:05 AM »

3 engined Me-110

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #35 on:** March 26, 2012, 09:59:09 AM »

Tricycle Ju-88 Schnellbomber

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #36 on:** March 26, 2012, 10:02:40 AM »

Arado + Ju-88

elmayerle · « **Reply #37 on:** March 26, 2012, 10:07:25 AM »

The thrree-engined Bf110 looks interesting, but I think you've got the center engine too far forward for good weight and balance. I'd move it aft until its firewall is about a foot ahead of the windscreen. Now, the tri-gear variant might need a bit more room to allow for stowing the nose gear, but I'd still move the engine no farther forward than necessary and look at rotating the wheel assembly and stowing it under the pilot.

finsrin · « **Reply #38 on:** March 26, 2012, 10:51:36 AM »

New drawings starting with #30 are all cool and inspiring for bashing. You making me overwhelmed with want-to-do's with current bash about 60% done and a few others with basic configuration-models determined. All to be faster than Slowy Jet (maybe one won't). And now I have to leave town for a week and stop construction. So many concepts, so many models, not enough time. No doubt ysi_maniac will contribute to my restless nights of kit-bash configuration contemplation while traveling.
Bill

The Big Gimper · « **Reply #39 on:** March 26, 2012, 06:35:52 PM »

Quote from: ysi_maniac on March 26, 2012, 10:02:40 AM

Arado + Ju-88

I like that. I have some "extra" DML AR234s I had no plans for but this could be the solution. :)

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #40 on:** March 27, 2012, 09:39:03 AM »

Another 5 engines airliner :)

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #41 on:** March 27, 2012, 09:42:21 AM »

Quote from: elmayerle on March 26, 2012, 10:07:25 AM

The thrree-engined Bf110 looks interesting, but I think you've got the center engine too far forward for good weight and balance. I'd move it aft until its firewall is about a foot ahead of the windscreen. Now, the tri-gear variant might need a bit more room to allow for stowing the nose gear, but I'd still move the engine no farther forward than necessary and look at rotating the wheel assembly and stowing it under the pilot.

Hi Evan,
One day, when I begin to do this in styrene I will take your suggestion into account
Thanks.

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #42 on:** March 27, 2012, 09:49:26 AM »

Luftwaffe '49 Amerikabomber

This can be done in styrene with a He-177 1/72 and a Tu-20 1/100 scaloramed to 1/72 (do you remember that old East Germany kit?)

finsrin · « **Reply #43 on:** March 27, 2012, 11:04:26 AM »

Before reading this at bottom of picture "This can be done in styrene with a He-177 1/72 and a Tu-20 1/100 scaloramed to 1/72" I was thinking same thing. After doing a few attack & fighter planes I would like to try medium to big bomber bashes.
Your bash concept fits right in.
Bill

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #44 on:** March 28, 2012, 11:27:02 PM »

elmayerle · « **Reply #45 on:** March 29, 2012, 11:53:14 AM »

That tail could come from a Me210. 'Twould make a very buildable subject in plastic.

Lensfire · « **Reply #46 on:** April 03, 2012, 02:10:41 AM »

I've only just joined this forum - some of these creations are amazing! I really like the first post - the Mig 21/Draken. I'd love to try to build one by combining a couple of kits - it just looks so right.

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #47 on:** April 06, 2012, 11:44:52 AM »

^^^^^
First studies of Draken considered this config: Nose intake and real world delta data

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #48 on:** April 06, 2012, 11:46:40 AM »

I am happy with this, now! :thumbsup:

ysi_maniac · « **Reply #49 on:** April 06, 2012, 11:48:09 AM »

Giving some power to arado


Scandinavian GB Now Open!!!

News:

Author Topic: ysi_maniac's drawings (Read 450156 times)