Author Topic: Mig-17 cruise missile  (Read 4722 times)

Offline finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Mig-17 cruise missile
« on: March 15, 2015, 02:51:48 PM »
Attached picture is of 1/152 Malka Bros. Mig-17PF built as 1/72 cruise missile.
Sanded off canopy.  No landing gear.  Painted camo.
Raw kit on sprue and finished.  1/72 Sherman and SBDJ Dauntless II included for size comparison.
Can set up V-1 style rail launcher and/or be air launched.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2015, 03:28:50 PM by finsrin »

Offline FAAMAN

  • 'bin building for years ....... and it feels it!
  • Always thought of himself as a 'straight' modeller
Re: Mig-17 cruise missile
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2015, 04:19:04 PM »
Nice and different, well done  :)
"Resistance is useless, prepare to be assembled!"

Offline Brian da Basher

  • He has an unnatural attraction to Spats...and a growing fascination with airships!
  • Moderator
  • *
  • Hulk smash, Brian bash
Re: Mig-17 cruise missile
« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2015, 06:42:29 PM »
Wow that's really cool, Bill!

I'd have never thought to turn a small MiG into a cruise missile. You've got a wicked imagination!

I especially like the snaky camo pattern!

Brian da Basher

Offline Volkodav

  • Counts rivits with his abacus...
  • Much older now...but procrastinating about it
Re: Mig-17 cruise missile
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2015, 06:49:06 PM »
Cool, really cool!  The Raduga KS-1 Komet or NATO AS1 Kennel apparently had aerodynamics derived from the MIG 15 so a MIG 17 derived cruise missile follows quite well.

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: Mig-17 cruise missile
« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2015, 07:56:08 PM »
Interesting, thanks! :D (but very secret, ssht: don't say this was Real) ;)

Offline Jeffry Fontaine

  • Unaffiliated Independent Subversive...and the last person to go for a trip on a Mexicana dH Comet 4
  • Global Moderator
  • His stash is able to be seen from space...
Re: Mig-17 cruise missile
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2015, 02:26:01 AM »
That is definitely a small model that you started with Bill.  Nice easy conversion to a missile but what are you going to have carrying the thing?
"Every day we hear about new studies 'revealing' what should have been obvious to sentient beings for generations; 'Research shows wolverines don't like to be teased" -- Jonah Goldberg


Online The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Mig-17 cruise missile
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2015, 04:53:23 AM »
Who knew that 1/156 would be the perfect scale for VVS cruise missiles.

A Tu-16 could carry at least three.

Excellent demonstration of non-linear thinking Bill.
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Re: Mig-17 cruise missile
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2015, 10:23:40 AM »
Thanks for comments.  Yes, is much like that RW cruise missile.  Since I build all to be 1/72 this was obvious thing to try.  Have 23 left to build same cept try different color schemes.  The "kits" are more toy than model.  Styrene glue does not work.  Material is more a Tupperware than anything else. 
Archipelago diorama can have ground launcher site while some are under bomber wings like unfinished B-201.
Couple can be on trucks being transported to launch site.
Kits have drop tanks.  Can include those on missiles doing longer range strikes.

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: Mig-17 cruise missile
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2015, 12:51:32 PM »
but what are you going to have carrying the thing?
I was hoping an answer like "obviously, with this central tall fin on the missile, the carrier must be twin-boom...". No?

Offline finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Re: Mig-17 cruise missile
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2015, 01:59:43 PM »
but what are you going to have carrying the thing?
I was hoping an answer like "obviously, with this central tall fin on the missile, the carrier must be twin-boom...". No?

Hmmmmm,,,   Perhaps C-119 with cockpit-cargo section shaved off 1-2ft down.  Cockpit-crew section on top of wing.
CM-17 (Cruise Missile 17) pylons below running length of center section.  At least one pylon under each outer wing.
Ya know --- am on to something here !
Thanks for twin boom mental push.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2015, 02:14:45 PM by finsrin »

Online The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Mig-17 cruise missile
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2015, 06:32:35 PM »
but what are you going to have carrying the thing?
I was hoping an answer like "obviously, with this central tall fin on the missile, the carrier must be twin-boom...". No?

Hmmmmm,,,   Perhaps C-119 with cockpit-cargo section shaved off 1-2ft down.  Cockpit-crew section on top of wing.
CM-17 (Cruise Missile 17) pylons below running length of center section.  At least one pylon under each outer wing.
Ya know --- am on to something here !
Thanks for twin boom mental push.

A zwilling made up of two C-119s or two Noratlas's. Three CM-17s. One on each outboard with and one between the fuselages.  The Noratlas has a more Soviet Bloc look to it and from the images of the kit, It looks to be an easier zwilling build. Give one side a big nose treatment with Yak-25 Flashlight schnoz.
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...