Beyond The Sprues

Current and Finished Projects => Physical Models => Aero-space => Topic started by: Weaver on April 19, 2014, 10:15:44 AM

Title: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: Weaver on April 19, 2014, 10:15:44 AM
(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/hws5mp/The%20Whiffery/HAT/SPKaero-Copy.gif) (http://s35.photobucket.com/user/hws5mp/media/The%20Whiffery/HAT/SPKaero-Copy.gif.html)


(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/hws5mp/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT1.jpg) (http://s35.photobucket.com/user/hws5mp/media/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT1.jpg.html)


   Spackman Aerospace was formed in the early 1960s, initially to conduct aerodynamic research and develop equipment for high-altitude flight. However, a shortage of available aircraft on which to test their products led the company to seek an economical testbed aircraft of their own. The opportunity came when they became aware, through their service contacts, of an RAF Gnat trainer whose wing had been damaged beyond repair when a ground vehicle ran into it. The airframe was duly acquired and fitted with a pair of radically different wings of the company's own design.


(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/hws5mp/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT2.jpg) (http://s35.photobucket.com/user/hws5mp/media/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT2.jpg.html)


   The High Altitude Testbed, or H.A.T. as it is more commonly known, has subsequently served for many years on a variety of projects, the details of which the company are not at liberty to discuss due to commercial confidentiality and contractual restrictions, and this has led to much ill-informed speculation which the company are at pains to dismiss. In particular, the aircraft has only ever been used for civilian and commercial purposes and never as a plausibly deniable surveillance asset by Her Majesty's Government.


(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/hws5mp/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT3.jpg) (http://s35.photobucket.com/user/hws5mp/media/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT3.jpg.html)


   The canopy is painted white purely to reduce solar heating in the cockpit and not, as has been claimed, to conceal the nature of equipment installed in place of the former rear seat. The dielectric areas on the nose, wings and tail are for precision navigation equipment so that the aircraft is always exactly sure of it's location for safety reasons, and the pods sometimes seen under the wings are part of an air sampling project conducted in partnership with the University of Cheltenham. Coincidentally, these pods also feature areas of dielectric material, but in this case it is used purely to avoid static electricity charges interfering with the collection of delicate pollen samples.


(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/hws5mp/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT4.jpg) (http://s35.photobucket.com/user/hws5mp/media/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT4.jpg.html)


   Although Spackman Aerospace does occasionally undertake work abroad for foreign governments, this is always strictly in compliance with HM government regulations and the company never operates near conflict zones or in areas of political controversy. However the similarity of the H.A.T. to a standard Gnat has lead to many erroneous sighting reports from areas of the world where the aircraft has categorically never operated. Areas that the H.A.T. definitely hasn't been seen in include Cyprus in 1967 and 1973, Southern Chile in 1982, Barbados in 1983, Southern Turkey  in 1991 and 2003, Austria in 1991, various parts of Italy in 1992, 1995 and 2011, Northern Greece in 1998 and  Uzbekistan in 2007. Despite the fact that only one aircraft was ever built, scrupulous maintenance and a huge stock of spare parts have kept it serviceable for a remarkable 40 year career.


(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/hws5mp/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT6.jpg) (http://s35.photobucket.com/user/hws5mp/media/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT6.jpg.html)


(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d165/hws5mp/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT5.jpg) (http://s35.photobucket.com/user/hws5mp/media/The%20Whiffery/HAT/HAT5.jpg.html)


Did this one for a tribute build here: http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,38469.60.html (http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,38469.60.html)
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: Volkodav on April 19, 2014, 10:33:21 AM

 :)

That looks really neat, the wing just blends straight in
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: finsrin on April 19, 2014, 11:23:18 AM
Perfecto  :-* :-* :-*
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: Tophe on April 19, 2014, 12:57:53 PM
Nice result...
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: KiwiZac on April 19, 2014, 06:52:09 PM
Very nice! Great build, nice details, and a good backstory.
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: GTX_Admin on April 20, 2014, 02:38:10 AM
Sweet!
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: FAAMAN on April 20, 2014, 07:22:38 AM
 8)Wonderful Whiff well done!! Looks "right" in that form.  :) :)
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: Dr. YoKai on April 20, 2014, 09:36:43 PM
Absolutely Top...Hat! ;)  really spendid blending.
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: Brian da Basher on April 27, 2014, 12:34:15 AM
You certainly take "plausible deniability" to a whole new level, Weaver!

Love the mods, especially the canopy, which appear flawless!

Brian da Basher
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: Frank3k on April 27, 2014, 03:05:24 AM
Great model overall, but the wings are an especially good fit to the design.
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: taiidantomcat on April 27, 2014, 11:41:47 PM
Very reinvented, took me a second to pick all the parts out, I love it
Title: Re: Spackman Aerospace H.A.T.
Post by: Weaver on April 28, 2014, 02:02:27 AM
Heh - thanks folks; it was a fun exercise. 8)

The wings came from a 1/288th (maybe) Boeing 747-400 made by "Hobby Model Kits": one of those cheap'n'nasty half-toy-half-model things. I originally bought it for the scaleorama potential of it's engine pods, so the wings were spare. Didn't go on without a fight though: the had different amounts of droop and kept reverting to their original shape overnight after being bent symetrical. I had to bend them just beyond their elastic limit (heart in mouth time...) in half a dozen places to get them to stay put in the end.

The paint is from Halfords and is part of their acrylic ART FX range. I suspect that exactly the same paint is sold by Paperchase under a different brand name becuase the distinctive cans are the same shape. it looks great and it's intended to cover in one coat (might need two) but it has a very peculiar "hydrophobic" surface finish that makes water bead up and run off and home-print decals dry out without sticking!  Fortunately nice commercial decals from Fantasy Print Shop worked better and saved the day.

I actually made the "pollen sampling pods" mentioned in the text but I screwed up the paint on them at the last minute and I wasn't sure if I really liked them on the plane anyway, so I left them off. They were short and fat (Mystere IV rocket pods) and I'm now thinking that some longer, slimmer pods that project ahead of the wing like the Gnat's slipper tanks (but about half the diameter) would look better. Opinions?