Author Topic: Supermarine Spitfire Family  (Read 148619 times)

Offline apophenia

  • Perversely enjoys removing backgrounds.
  • Patterns? What patterns?
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #250 on: March 21, 2022, 10:50:55 AM »
"Report back to me when, uh ... I don't know ... when it makes sense."

Offline perttime

  • The man has produced a Finnish Napier Heston Fighter...need we say more?
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #251 on: March 21, 2022, 01:16:02 PM »
My response to turboprop Spitfires ... https://beyondthesprues.com/Forum/index.php?topic=351.msg195226#msg195226
The Spiteful and Seafang fuselages had the cockpit raised a little, which might improve visibility.

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #252 on: March 21, 2022, 09:11:30 PM »
My response to turboprop Spitfires ... https://beyondthesprues.com/Forum/index.php?topic=351.msg195226#msg195226
The Spiteful and Seafang fuselages had the cockpit raised a little, which might improve visibility.

I've always wondered why Supermarine didn't use the Spiteful fuselage on the Spitfire instead of messing around with the F.23 like they did.

Offline perttime

  • The man has produced a Finnish Napier Heston Fighter...need we say more?
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #253 on: March 22, 2022, 02:24:44 AM »
I think the Airfix 1:48 Seafire 47comes with some extra wing bits. Does anybody produce a 1:48 Seafang or Spiteful?

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #254 on: March 22, 2022, 03:28:40 AM »
I think the Airfix 1:48 Seafire 47comes with some extra wing bits. Does anybody produce a 1:48 Seafang or Spiteful?
Trumpeter does, I've got them in my stash (part of the very few 1/48 kits I have)

Offline apophenia

  • Perversely enjoys removing backgrounds.
  • Patterns? What patterns?
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #255 on: March 23, 2022, 05:40:12 AM »
I've always wondered why Supermarine didn't use the Spiteful fuselage on the Spitfire instead of messing around with the F.23 like they did.

Agreed. A Spiteful fuselage with F.22 wings would've got Supermarine to a better place quicker than them faffing about with the 'Vickers Valiant'.

Love your hybrid build! I had an early-war whack at the Spiteful-with-Spitfire-wings concept. And, it turns out, that was almost a decade ago ...  :o

-- https://beyondthesprues.com/Forum/index.php?topic=351.msg30920#msg30920
"Report back to me when, uh ... I don't know ... when it makes sense."

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #256 on: March 23, 2022, 07:55:09 AM »
My Seafire 45 hybrid is based on a Mk.21 but with the Spiteful tail group.

Offline perttime

  • The man has produced a Finnish Napier Heston Fighter...need we say more?
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #257 on: March 23, 2022, 01:28:32 PM »
Paul Bonhomme on Flying Spitfire FR XIV:

https://vintageaviationecho.com/spitfire-mkxiv-mv293/

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #258 on: January 08, 2023, 01:07:18 AM »
January 2023 Update.

The complete list of current two-seat Spitfires.

Airworthy
1. MT818 Airworthy operated by Biggin Hill Heritage Hangar
2. MJ627 Airworthy operated by Biggin Hill Heritage Hangar
3. MJ772 Airworthy now lives at the Royal Netherlands Historic Flight foundation.
4. ML407 Airworthy operated by Ultimate Warbird Flights
5. PV202 Airworthy operated by Aerial Collective
6. TE308 Airworthy operated by Biggin Hill Heritage Hangar
7. PT462 Airworthy operated by Aerial Collective 
8. MH367 Airworthy operated by Warbird Adventure Rides
9. SM520 Airworthy operated by Spitfires.com
10. NH341 Airworthy operated by Aero Legends
11. ML295  Airworthy restored at Biggin Hill Heritage Hangar
12. BS410 Owned by Martin Philips. Operated by @Spitfire

Non airworthy
13. EN570 Being restored for Norwegian Flying Aces 
14. MJ444 Being restored for Aero Legends
15. BS548  Being restored by Aircraft Restoration Company  for Ross Pay.
16. TE566  Being restored by Airframe Assemblies Ltd  for Enstone.
17. A T9 being restored for Aerial Collective at ARCo.

There are at least three other aircraft that are proposed but until they get off of the drawing board then I'll leave them off of the public list.
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #259 on: July 21, 2023, 07:17:45 AM »
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #260 on: July 22, 2023, 02:28:58 AM »
Different drop tanks - look like US ones.
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #261 on: July 22, 2023, 05:04:02 AM »
Kind of a retro-idea, Soviet Lend-lease Spitfire re-engined with a suitable Soviet engine that would be better adapted to the Soviet fuels and lubricants.

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #262 on: July 22, 2023, 06:01:01 AM »
Different drop tanks - look like US ones.

Yes. They are US 75 Gal tanks.

Build, display, take flak from the JMNs. Then their heads will explode when you correct them! 
« Last Edit: July 22, 2023, 06:28:19 AM by The Big Gimper »
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #263 on: July 23, 2023, 02:45:37 AM »
Kind of a retro-idea, Soviet Lend-lease Spitfire re-engined with a suitable Soviet engine that would be better adapted to the Soviet fuels and lubricants.

I presume the most likely candidate would be the Klimov M-105.
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline Jeffry Fontaine

  • Unaffiliated Independent Subversive...and the last person to go for a trip on a Mexicana dH Comet 4
  • Global Moderator
  • His stash is able to be seen from space...
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #264 on: November 15, 2023, 04:09:28 AM »
"Every day we hear about new studies 'revealing' what should have been obvious to sentient beings for generations; 'Research shows wolverines don't like to be teased" -- Jonah Goldberg

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #265 on: December 09, 2023, 01:26:12 AM »
What about a French Spitfire development with a Hispano-Suiza 12Y engine instead of the Merlin?  One advantage of this might be that it could be fitted with an engine mounted 20 mm Hispano-Suiza cannon.  Perhaps have it based upon the Mk.1 Spitfire?
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline perttime

  • The man has produced a Finnish Napier Heston Fighter...need we say more?
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #266 on: December 09, 2023, 03:30:14 PM »
What about a French Spitfire development with a Hispano-Suiza 12Y engine instead of the Merlin?  One advantage of this might be that it could be fitted with an engine mounted 20 mm Hispano-Suiza cannon.  Perhaps have it based upon the Mk.1 Spitfire?
Take the nose from a Dewoitine D.520 (somewhat sleek) or Morane-Saulnier M.S.406 (a bit lumpy).

Offline apophenia

  • Perversely enjoys removing backgrounds.
  • Patterns? What patterns?
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #267 on: December 10, 2023, 11:57:38 AM »
"Report back to me when, uh ... I don't know ... when it makes sense."

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #268 on: April 10, 2024, 07:10:55 AM »
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline perttime

  • The man has produced a Finnish Napier Heston Fighter...need we say more?
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #269 on: April 10, 2024, 12:21:00 PM »
^ I wonder how they ended up using the same name of the design that we usually identify as Spitfire. Type 224 was quite different.

Offline apophenia

  • Perversely enjoys removing backgrounds.
  • Patterns? What patterns?
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #270 on: April 11, 2024, 07:30:21 AM »
Cool document  :smiley:

^ I wonder how they ended up using the same name of the design that we usually identify as Spitfire. Type 224 was quite different.

The name suggestion came from the Chairman of Vickers (Aviation) Ltd., Robert McLean. Reportedly, R.J. Mitchell disliked this appellation and it was dropped from use for the Type 225. However, Sir Robert was in a position to reassert his name preference for the Type 300 ... by which time Mitchell was probably too ill to continue his objections.

"Report back to me when, uh ... I don't know ... when it makes sense."

Offline robunos

  • Can't afford the top wing of his biplanes...
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #271 on: April 12, 2024, 03:22:31 AM »
Cool document  :smiley:

^ I wonder how they ended up using the same name of the design that we usually identify as Spitfire. Type 224 was quite different.

The name suggestion came from the Chairman of Vickers (Aviation) Ltd., Robert McLean. Reportedly, R.J. Mitchell disliked this appellation and it was dropped from use for the Type 225. However, Sir Robert was in a position to reassert his name preference for the Type 300 ... by which time Mitchell was probably too ill to continue his objections.


Also, as I understand from what I've read, at this time, a name could be proposed, but would not be adopted by the RAF until a production order was placed, or was expected to be placed . . .
Also, I've also read, somewhere, that when the 'real' Spitfire was named, Mitchell's response was 'that's the sort of bl**dy stupid name they would give it', or words to that effect . . .



cheers,
Robin.
By the pricking of my thumbs, Something Whiff-y this way comes . . .

Offline raafif

  • Is formally accused of doing nasty things to DC-3s...and officially our first whiffing zombie
  • Whiffing Insane
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #272 on: April 12, 2024, 06:07:12 AM »
I'm sure they felt the same about the Fairey "Flycatcher" ... but I'm also sure that it did catch quite a few flies & other insects on its windscreen  ;D

Offline raafif

  • Is formally accused of doing nasty things to DC-3s...and officially our first whiffing zombie
  • Whiffing Insane
Re: Supermarine Spitfire Family
« Reply #273 on: April 29, 2024, 08:41:19 AM »
Someone here suggested a Dart version of the Spitfire .... :-\