Author Topic: Airliners: Alternate roles  (Read 17592 times)

Offline Daryl J.

  • Assures us he rarely uses model glue in dentistry
Airliners: Alternate roles
« on: April 28, 2012, 12:35:58 AM »
The early Boeing 737 becomes the first Poseidon in 1966.


And a question for the Boeing experts:  Why the 737 for the Poseidon and the Wedgetail, etc.?    Is it a particularly robust airframe when compared to its peers?  Was it originally designed with a military application as well should the need arise?   


Discuss.    :D
kwyxdxLg5T

Offline Logan Hartke

  • High priest in the black arts of profiling...
  • Rivet-counting whiffer
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2012, 01:16:25 AM »


Well, the 737 airframe has been used by Indonesia for the MPA role since the 80s, so it's already been doing that role for about 30 years.  It's not too impractical to think that it could have been started earlier.  The 737 is--in some ways--an evolution of the 707 series that started with the Dash 80 back in 1954.  The Dash-80 was designed as dual-use, spawning the KC-135 and 707 at basically the same time, so considered that way, the 737 is an evolution of an airframe designed from the start with the possibility of military applications, yes.



So, could the 737 become the maritime patrol plane of the US Navy in the P-3 period of the Cold War starting in the 1960s?  To be honest, no, I don't think it could have.  I think it could have been an MPA much sooner than it did, but it wouldn't have been nearly as capable.  The 737 was initially designed for relatively fast, short-haul work at medium altitude.  The was basically the opposite of what a Cold War MPA needed to be.  An MPA in the 60s-90s needed to be able to fly low and slow for VERY long period of time.  The 737 could do exactly none of these things well.



Since then the 737 has gotten to be much larger, able to carry a lot more fuel and equipment.  It's really a beast of a plane compared to its 1960s forefather.  Jet engines are now a lot more fuel efficient and reliable.  In the 1960s, a twin-jet plane couldn't have cruised 1,000 miles out to sea for 6 hours.  Even if it could, the very real possibility of engine failure meant that you wouldn't want to attempt it.  That's no longer the case.

Sensors have gotten much better and submarines far less numerous since the 1990s, as well, placing a greater emphasis on surface patrol.  For both of these reasons, it's better to conduct these patrols at medium- to high-altitude rather than low-altitude.



You couldn't have really had a 737-based Poseidon in the 1960s or even the 1970s.  Even in the 1980s, such an aircraft would be inferior to the 20 year old P-3 then in service.  You COULD have had a 707-based aircraft, but it would have been much closer to a Nimrod than a P-3, in all likelihood.

I hope that helps!

Cheers,

Logan

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2012, 03:54:02 AM »
I have often wondered about doing the 737 as a mini refueller KC-737
« Last Edit: April 29, 2012, 04:05:40 AM by GTX_Admin »
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Online elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2012, 03:59:59 AM »
if memory serves me correctly (no guarantee as I'm three score plus in age), the 727 was designed with military applications in mind, too.  -chuckle- I could see that aft stairwell converted to house a drogue unit with another one under each wing.  I can see several interesting possibilities here.  If you didn't need the room, mate a 727-100 fuselage with a -200 wing and upgrade the engines (JT8D-200 series engines in the nacelles - same nacelles, possibly as the MD-80 series - and a cropped fan JT8D-200 in the center to match available volume and airflow constraints).

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2012, 05:02:05 AM »
speaking of alternatively rolled airliners, i have a 1/72 dH Comet 4 kit that is going to be turned into an aerial refueller for the RAAF instead of the real world B707s.  I already have the B707 tanker conversion bits and decals.  Will be in high viz markings (similar to below) and set in a mid air diorama setting.

All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline Jeffry Fontaine

  • Unaffiliated Independent Subversive...and the last person to go for a trip on a Mexicana dH Comet 4
  • Global Moderator
  • His stash is able to be seen from space...
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2012, 05:03:34 AM »
if memory serves me correctly (no guarantee as I'm three score plus in age), the 727 was designed with military applications in mind, too.  -chuckle- I could see that aft stairwell converted to house a drogue unit with another one under each wing.  I can see several interesting possibilities here.  If you didn't need the room, mate a 727-100 fuselage with a -200 wing and upgrade the engines (JT8D-200 series engines in the nacelles - same nacelles, possibly as the MD-80 series - and a cropped fan JT8D-200 in the center to match available volume and airflow constraints).


Some U.S. Government entity actually did use the Boeing 727 to successfully deliver door bundles by parachute from the aft stairwell.  I have always considered the 727 as an ideal platform for covert insertion of forces by HALO or HAHO because of that aft stairwell feature.  If the stairs could be removed and a ramp installed it would make parachute delivery of small bundles quite convenient. 
"Every day we hear about new studies 'revealing' what should have been obvious to sentient beings for generations; 'Research shows wolverines don't like to be teased" -- Jonah Goldberg

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2012, 05:13:44 AM »
What about a MPA based upon the Boeing 727?



or a missile firing 727:

« Last Edit: April 29, 2012, 05:18:29 AM by GTX_Admin »
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2012, 05:24:16 AM »
DC8 based AWACS anyone?



All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline Logan Hartke

  • High priest in the black arts of profiling...
  • Rivet-counting whiffer
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2012, 05:34:00 AM »
Great pics, Greg!

Some U.S. Government entity actually did use the Boeing 727 to successfully deliver door bundles by parachute from the aft stairwell.  I have always considered the 727 as an ideal platform for covert insertion of forces by HALO or HAHO because of that aft stairwell feature.  If the stairs could be removed and a ramp installed it would make parachute delivery of small bundles quite convenient.

FedEx had one on display during an airshow here in Jacksonville a few years ago.  They had the aft stairwell down so that you could tour it and upon boarding the aircraft, I was welcomed by the pilot.  I pointed back to the stairs and said, "Ah, the infamous D. B. Cooper airstairs."  He said, "Yep.  You know, I actually flew that plane, years ago, after the whole D. B. Cooper incident."

Cheers,

Logan

Online elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2012, 05:47:46 AM »
How about a VC-22 conversion of the 727 in markings similar to Air Force One?  Designation comes from some second-hand 727s operated as C-22s.  Engine and other options for the VC-22 are open to several choices - perhaps the upgraded 727-100 I mentioned as the changes would give nice "hot and high" capability.

Offline Daryl J.

  • Assures us he rarely uses model glue in dentistry
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2012, 03:54:24 AM »
Quote
FedEx had one on display during an airshow here in Jacksonville a few years ago.  They had the aft stairwell down so that you could tour it and upon boarding the aircraft, I was welcomed by the pilot.  I pointed back to the stairs and said, "Ah, the infamous D. B. Cooper airstairs."  He said, "Yep.  You know, I actually flew that plane, years ago, after the whole D. B. Cooper incident."

The cash recovered some years later on the banks of the Columbia River was found not two miles due west from our house.     :)

Does that mean the CIA dropped agents from the back end of 727's if the agents were equipped with glider wings ala James Bond?    :-\
kwyxdxLg5T

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2012, 05:32:51 AM »
This is my Avro Atlantic which will be RCAF when finished.  It will be a tanker/transport with the added SAR search role (hence the radar under the fuselage)
« Last Edit: April 30, 2012, 05:34:52 AM by kitnut617 »

Offline RussC

  • Our own personal dragon trainer...with a flying wing fetish
  • Resident Painter
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #12 on: April 30, 2012, 07:25:22 PM »
Although not very different externally, there was a 747 ALCM launch platform concept in the 1970's. Makes you wonder if the KAL-007 shootdown didn't come from suspicion of jumbo jets in general.



Good Grief, not the parasite fighter thing again...



Good to see the NASA 747's will have some post-shuttle work.




Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #13 on: April 30, 2012, 11:14:07 PM »



Now that thing on top looks like what the Iranians were saying they shot down

Offline ChernayaAkula

  • Was left standing in front when everyone else took one step back...
  • Global Moderator
  • Putting the "pro" in procrastination since...?
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #14 on: May 01, 2012, 02:28:04 AM »
^ The shape is similar from this angle, but they're different beasts. The Iranians bagged an RQ-170 Sentinel. What sits on the 747 is a Boeing Phantom Ray (developed from the X-45C), a much bigger beast.
Would be cool if they could air-launch it from the 747!  >:D
« Last Edit: May 01, 2012, 02:31:18 AM by ChernayaAkula »
Cheers,
Moritz

"The appropriate response to reality is to go insane!"

Offline Daryl J.

  • Assures us he rarely uses model glue in dentistry
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #15 on: May 02, 2012, 06:27:27 AM »
At 4,000 hp/side, the Convair 580 could be put to use.   Ground attack?
kwyxdxLg5T

Offline finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #16 on: May 02, 2012, 09:26:31 AM »
At 4,000 hp/side, the Convair 580 could be put to use.   Ground attack?

Yes, I like it.  And add J85 pods as on a C-123.

Offline raafif

  • Is formally accused of doing nasty things to DC-3s...and officially our first whiffing zombie
  • Whiffing Insane
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #17 on: May 06, 2012, 08:56:26 AM »
with so many airliners being retired as no longer profitable ....

Online elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #18 on: May 06, 2012, 10:35:47 AM »
with so many airliners being retired as no longer profitable ....
Hmm, perhaps an articulated bus made from a 707 or DC-8 fuselage?

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #19 on: May 19, 2012, 04:06:45 AM »
What about some of the twin engined airliners such as A320s or B737s turned into dedicated medium sized bombers?  Make use of all the passenger/cargo space for weapons, sensors, fuel.  Maybe keep the standard cockpit or even give it a tandem seat arrangement.  Maybe even give it some sort of defensive armament?  The end result would be a relatively low cost, though potentially very capable modern day equivalent to the medium bombers of WWII.  Sure, it won't be stealthy and would probably be easy meat for any serious fighter opposition but since when should we let reality get in the way...
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline RussC

  • Our own personal dragon trainer...with a flying wing fetish
  • Resident Painter
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #20 on: May 19, 2012, 06:49:13 AM »
with so many airliners being retired as no longer profitable ....


Or go to sea













This one is a restaurant called Solo's in Colorado Springs


Offline raafif

  • Is formally accused of doing nasty things to DC-3s...and officially our first whiffing zombie
  • Whiffing Insane
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #21 on: May 19, 2012, 07:25:00 AM »
beds for the pilots ??  Why should they get better accomodation than the passengers ! :icon_nif:

Oh, wait .... its the new prone-pilot version for higher-G take-offs >:D

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #22 on: May 20, 2012, 09:50:18 AM »
Not so much a different role but rather a variation from the normal:  what about a turboprop B737 or B747?
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Online elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #23 on: May 20, 2012, 10:25:42 AM »
Not so much a different role but rather a variation from the normal:  what about a turboprop B737 or B747?
Or with propfans?

Offline jcf

  • Global Moderator
  • Turn that Gila-copter down!
Re: Airliners: Alternate roles
« Reply #24 on: May 20, 2012, 02:43:39 PM »
I've eaten at Solos (food is so-so, atmosphere is a kick), and I have pics of Gail in the pilot's seat.
“Conspiracy theory’s got to be simple.
Sense doesn’t come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated shit
actually is than they ever are about
whatever’s supposed to be behind the
conspiracy.”
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014