Author Topic: Australian Air Force Interceptor  (Read 5219 times)

Offline ScranJ51

  • Fast Jet, Fast Prop, Fast Racing Cars - thats me!!
Australian Air Force Interceptor
« on: May 02, 2016, 04:42:00 PM »
79 SQN RAAF









Fast Jet, Fast Prop, Fast Racing Cars - thats me!!

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2016, 01:39:20 AM »
 :)

1/72 I presume.
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline Camthalion

  • The man has done a pink tank...need we say more?!
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2016, 07:45:00 AM »
Nice one

Offline Antonio Sobral

  • Building and painting tiny little things!
  • Greetings from Portugal
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2016, 03:43:52 PM »
I really like the design!

... but I hate the Airfix kit! Why won't they spend a little effort on making a better version? :(

Offline Weaver

  • Skyhawk stealer and violator of Panthers, with designs on a Cougar and a Tiger too
  • Chaos Engineer & Evangelistic Agnostic
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2016, 07:57:33 PM »
Nice one Scran! Now all they need in an RAAF version of Cloudbase to go with it.... >:D


:)

1/72 I presume.

Endlessly debatable...

The Airfix kit is allegedly 1/72nd scale, but it's actually significantly 'under-scale' compared to the alleged dimensions of the 'real thing'. Of course, since the 'real thing' is entirely fictional, and since movie/TV people are notorious for fudges and inconsistencies, you can argue about it 'til the cos come home. It definitely looks small when compared to other 1/72nd models though, particularly when you consider it's claimed capabilities, which are something like a mixture of an F-16 and an SR-71!* When RetroKit made their resin cockpit and pilot sets for the Angel, they provided two figures: a genuinely 1/72nd scale standing figure and a much smaller one that actually fits in the cockpit....


* Something I'll get around to one of these years is a 'realistic' 1/72nd scale Angel Interceptor: current planning has it based on an RF-101C Voodoo airframe with English Electric P.10 style ramjet wings...
"I have described nothing but what I saw myself, or learned from others" - Thucydides

"I've jazzed mine up a bit" - Spike Milligan

"I'm a general specialist," - Harry Purvis in Tales from the White Hart by Arthur C. Clarke

Twitter: @hws5mp
Minds.com: @HaroldWeaverSmith

Offline Kelmola

  • Seeking motivation to start buillding the stash
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2016, 10:35:14 PM »
Isn't that the problem with most scifi planes/ships/whatever in movies/TV that they are ludicrously undersized for their capabilities and/or extremely impractical too?

In this particular example (not being at all familiar with what it's supposed to do), I can understand that in real world, the landing skids on this one are influenced by X-15 and other high-speed experimental aircraft of the time. Which of course make perfect sense if you try to land on an unpaved salt lake bed, but much less so if landing on a prepared runway or an aircraft carrier. Nevermind that even if you had full VTOL capabilities, you couldn't taxi at all with those skids, so you would have to do even the smallest position changes by hovering - or be towed around and again, wheels would be much more practical for that, there might be a reason why most of the traffic is on wheels and not on skids...

The kit is well-done nevertheless and looks nice in those markings :)

Offline Brian da Basher

  • He has an unnatural attraction to Spats...and a growing fascination with airships!
  • Moderator
  • *
  • Hulk smash, Brian bash
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2016, 05:37:08 PM »
It's always a treat to see a model spiced up with 'roos!

It looks so natural as a RAAF bird it's almost scary.

Nice work!

Brian da Basher

Offline Weaver

  • Skyhawk stealer and violator of Panthers, with designs on a Cougar and a Tiger too
  • Chaos Engineer & Evangelistic Agnostic
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2016, 06:14:20 PM »
Isn't that the problem with most scifi planes/ships/whatever in movies/TV that they are ludicrously undersized for their capabilities and/or extremely impractical too?

Not only that, there's a quite a few cases where the interior sets don't match up to the exterior models at all!


Quote
In this particular example (not being at all familiar with what it's supposed to do), I can understand that in real world, the landing skids on this one are influenced by X-15 and other high-speed experimental aircraft of the time. Which of course make perfect sense if you try to land on an unpaved salt lake bed, but much less so if landing on a prepared runway or an aircraft carrier. Nevermind that even if you had full VTOL capabilities, you couldn't taxi at all with those skids, so you would have to do even the smallest position changes by hovering - or be towed around and again, wheels would be much more practical for that, there might be a reason why most of the traffic is on wheels and not on skids...

Landing pads/skids are a classic example of the Rule-Of-Cool winning far too often in popular sci-fi. Just about anything is better on wheels in practice. The weird thing is that many, if not most of the normal aircraft in the GA series had wheels, so it's not like there was a practical SFX reason for avoiding them.

The Angel Interceptors were general purpose fighter-bombers that operated over a huge patrol range, at hypersonic speeds, from a flying 'aircraft carrier' called Cloudbase. The skids engaged with tracks on the deck for a catapult launch that looks fairly sensible, and since all aircraft deck/hangar handing was automated, you might plausibly imagine them being moved around on pallets that the skids are also locked into.

However, it's the landing that was batshit-crazy:  Cloudbase had 'landing platforms' on the back end that elevated to 45 deg, and the Angel approached them in a nose-up post-stall maneuver, aided by a forward-firing braking rocket at the tip of the tail fin, it's skids eventually hooking onto the platform! What could go wrong, huh? Why they didn't just do an arrested landing on that nice long deck is beyond me...

In the later animated (as opposed to puppet) series, they addressed quite a lot of this. The Angel Interceptors were much larger and more credible, and they landed and took off in sensible carrier-fashion from Cloudbase. At the front end of the deck there was a turntable elevator that delivered the aircraft to a conveyor-belt system that took it back ot the other end of the deck, refuelling and re-arming it as it went, before another tuntable elevator took it back up to the deck again for another launch.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2016, 06:17:52 PM by Weaver »
"I have described nothing but what I saw myself, or learned from others" - Thucydides

"I've jazzed mine up a bit" - Spike Milligan

"I'm a general specialist," - Harry Purvis in Tales from the White Hart by Arthur C. Clarke

Twitter: @hws5mp
Minds.com: @HaroldWeaverSmith

Offline ScranJ51

  • Fast Jet, Fast Prop, Fast Racing Cars - thats me!!
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2016, 08:15:13 AM »
OK - it is 1/72nd.

Re the size - for comparison:

beside a F-20 Tigershark


beside a Spit PR19


beside an F35 JSF



|Hope that helps!
Fast Jet, Fast Prop, Fast Racing Cars - thats me!!

Offline Weaver

  • Skyhawk stealer and violator of Panthers, with designs on a Cougar and a Tiger too
  • Chaos Engineer & Evangelistic Agnostic
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2016, 08:44:24 PM »
OK - it is 1/72nd.

Re the size - for comparison:

beside a F-20 Tigershark

But the point is that in the show, it seems to be considerably bigger than a Tigershark, more akin to an F-18 if anything.
"I have described nothing but what I saw myself, or learned from others" - Thucydides

"I've jazzed mine up a bit" - Spike Milligan

"I'm a general specialist," - Harry Purvis in Tales from the White Hart by Arthur C. Clarke

Twitter: @hws5mp
Minds.com: @HaroldWeaverSmith

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #10 on: May 08, 2016, 03:56:36 AM »
OK - it is 1/72nd.


Ta - I actually have a 1/48 resin one (yep, bragging!  ;))

Re the size - for comparison:

beside a F-20 Tigershark



Hmmm...that gives me ideas.  Maybe do as a light fighter in the same context as a F-5.

In fact, the Angel interceptor does bear a passing resemblance (IMHO) to some of the CAC concepts such as the XP-65:



All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #11 on: May 08, 2016, 04:01:46 AM »
Alternatively, one might do the Angel Interceptor in a diorama with a SA-43 Endo/Exo-Atmospheric Attack Jet ("Hammerhead")...after all, the Hammerheads have already been seen on a RAAF base ;)




Maybe say the Interceptor was the RAAF's equivalent fighter?
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline Weaver

  • Skyhawk stealer and violator of Panthers, with designs on a Cougar and a Tiger too
  • Chaos Engineer & Evangelistic Agnostic
Re: Australian Air Force Interceptor
« Reply #12 on: May 09, 2016, 02:40:30 AM »
Always amuses me how they build a sleek and 'aerodynamic' craft and then put a flat-panel gunship canopy on it... ;D

It's not, as most people think, for 'rule-of-cool' reasons: it's to make close-up filming easier, when the camera is outside the cockpit looking into it.  A curved canopy would cause troublesome glints and reflections of the studio, whereas a flat panel can be taken out completely and the frame still leave the shape of the canopy defined.
"I have described nothing but what I saw myself, or learned from others" - Thucydides

"I've jazzed mine up a bit" - Spike Milligan

"I'm a general specialist," - Harry Purvis in Tales from the White Hart by Arthur C. Clarke

Twitter: @hws5mp
Minds.com: @HaroldWeaverSmith