Author Topic: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350  (Read 10608 times)

Offline Alvis 3.1

  • Self acknowledged "Bad Influence"…but probably less attractive than Pink
  • The high priest of whiffing
Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« on: February 01, 2014, 03:24:16 PM »

In the late 1970s, forward thinking Soviet Naval officers began to realise the potential benefits of "Force projection", but how would they ever break the stranglehold the imperialists had with their supercarrier battlegroups? One of their intrepid admirals pushed through a pet project of his: the Submersible Carrier. It was hoped to not only break the Soviet Union into worldwide naval force projection, but would once again catapult them into the technological lead.

Using the basic hull (albeit a bit stretched) of the upcoming "Typhoon" class missile subs, the Project 344 would carry a complement of 8 Yak 141s and a single Kamov Ka-32 helicopter. This eliminated the potential of at least 32 MIRV capable SLBMs, for a minimal weapons carrying capacity at a very short range.

After a protracted development the Project 344 set sail on August 11, 1990, and began her shake-down cruise. A single Yak 38 was carried aboard to test the launching and recovery capabilities, and it was found that basic takeoffs and landings were fairly straightforward, but no weapons were carried. The deteriorating economic and political situation at home caused the cruise to be cut short, and the Project 344 was tied up in Vladivostok on August 23, 1990, never to set sail again.

While officially never named, the Type 344 was most likely to be named after a famous Soviet Arctic explorer, Admiral Phrozenutov, best known for his repeated attempts to sled to the North Pole, and to discover a direct link from Moscow to the Pacific. He got lost twice in Gorky Park during vicious snowstorms, and was forced to eat his sled dogs to survive. It is unknown how somebody with such poor navigation skills was able to rise to the rank of Admiral in the Soviet Navy...

The colossal cost overruns for developing such an ambitious project helped to bring about the economic collapse of the Soviet Union. Long believed scrapped, recent information has come to light that it was quietly sold to China, who promised to develop it as a deep sea tourist liner.











I used two Dragon 1/350 Typhoon subs to make this. The ski ramp was built up with sheet styrene. The planes were from Trumpeter, and the little peoples are from Fujimi.

I got the idea from a video game in 1989, called "F-18" It was an Amiga system game, and involved defending San Francisco from various attacks, one of which was from a submarine carrier off the coast. I always wanted to make something like it, and the idea began to percolate...

Alvis 3.1




Offline finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2014, 06:03:58 PM »
WOW what a build.  Love how you did what no model company stepped up to do  :-*
Never heard of project 344 ???   Learn many things here at BTS.
Considering so little reference material available from time of economic collapse of the Soviet Union; congrats on your research as well as build :)
Knew zilch about Soviet admirals but now have a start !

Offline Camthalion

  • The man has done a pink tank...need we say more?!
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2014, 10:33:14 PM »
Looks great.  Nice work

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2014, 03:54:45 AM »
Wow!  I mean, seriously WOW!!! :) :)
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline Queeg

  • Master armour builder
  • Lost but now foun .... nope - still lost!
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2014, 04:43:29 AM »
Yet another Wowser !!!!!!!!!!!!!!    :-* :-* :-* :-*

Offline Goonie

  • When the guy does a red tank, he does a RED tank!
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2014, 05:00:29 AM »
Great work, love it  :-*
sci-fi - the best legal antidote for reality

Offline Buzzbomb

  • Low Concentration Span, oft wanders betwixt projects
  • Accurate Scale representations of fictional stuff
    • Club and my stuff site
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2014, 05:24:49 AM »
 What he said....... Wow!!

Offline Cliffy B

  • Ship Whiffer Extraordinaire...master of Beyond Visual Range Modelling
  • Its ZOTT!!!
    • My Artwork
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #7 on: February 02, 2014, 05:44:51 AM »
Glad you re-posted this beast!  Its still awesome and I love the working elevator  :)
"Radials growl, inlines purr, jets blow!"  -Anonymous

"Helos don't fly.  They vibrate so violently that the ground rejects them."  -Tom Clancy

"If all else fails, call in an air strike."  -Anonymous

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2014, 07:14:08 AM »
I'll make it a third on "WOW!!"  That an awesomely gorgeous piece of work.  I can just see a US/British equivalent using Harriers and Skyhook on a stretched Ohio-class hull.

Offline Madhatter

  • BTS's Tony Stark
  • trainee plastic surgeon
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2014, 09:56:56 AM »
best thing I've seen done with this kit yet - very well done!
2 Reasons why a model is better than a wife:
1) A model doesn't get jealous when you look at another model
2) A model doesn't yell at you for spending money on another model

Online The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #10 on: March 15, 2014, 10:29:55 AM »
Now build a 1:1 scale and set it loose in the Victoria inner harbour one foggy morning.  ;)

Excellent work Alvis.
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline Kerick

  • Reportedly finished with a stripper...
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #11 on: March 15, 2014, 11:03:40 AM »
Build one ten feet long and set it loose on the fishermen at the local lake!

Offline Brian da Basher

  • He has an unnatural attraction to Spats...and a growing fascination with airships!
  • Moderator
  • *
  • Hulk smash, Brian bash
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #12 on: March 20, 2014, 06:25:17 AM »
OMG! LOL! YGSM! LOL!

An absolute scream and a whiff wonder to behold!

Now I need to clean off this monitor. I really should know better than to drink coffee while checking out the latest Alvis creation!

Brian da Basher

Offline MaxHeadroom

  • The man has built a jet Stuka, need we say more?
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #13 on: September 15, 2014, 08:20:52 AM »
But: how to land?

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #14 on: September 15, 2014, 08:55:08 AM »
But: how to land?
Vertically, of course!

Offline bluesman

  • Last of the Real Live Bluesmen
    • Magnum Creative Group
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2014, 01:34:06 AM »
Nice. Looks like Jack Ryan missed one coming out of the barn!

Offline ysi_maniac

  • I will die understanding not this world
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2015, 02:38:06 AM »
I have no WORDS!!! :) :) :) :) :) :-*

Offline Silver Fox

  • Talk to me Goose!
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #17 on: February 04, 2015, 06:18:36 AM »
Nice. Looks like Jack Ryan missed one coming out of the barn!

The model proudly rests on Admiral Greer's office mantleplace... so no, Sir Jack didn't miss one coming out of the barn. :)

Great model, great concept. Would make a good companion for one of the Soviet's proposed submersible landing ships.

Offline MaxHeadroom

  • The man has built a jet Stuka, need we say more?
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #18 on: February 26, 2015, 11:51:29 PM »
O.k, vertically..., but then: why to start conventually?

(Yes, theoretical questions..., nevertheless: a rrreally good job!)

Norbert

Offline jcf

  • Global Moderator
  • Turn that Gila-copter down!
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #19 on: February 27, 2015, 12:00:53 AM »
O.k, vertically..., but then: why to start conventually?

(Yes, theoretical questions..., nevertheless: a rrreally good job!)

Norbert

Because a STOVL mission profile enables the carriage of a larger fuel and weapons load, the load fractions are
far smaller in a pure VTOL mission. Plus in VTOL mode you double the jet-blast wear on the deck structure, it's
exposed to the full engine efflux at both ends of the sortie.

Ski-jump takeoff and skyhook recovery would be a hypothetical best setup.
“Conspiracy theory’s got to be simple.
Sense doesn’t come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated shit
actually is than they ever are about
whatever’s supposed to be behind the
conspiracy.”
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

Offline MaxHeadroom

  • The man has built a jet Stuka, need we say more?
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2015, 01:23:15 AM »
Thank you, jcf, now I see the advantages of STOVL.
Honestly, I'd hadn't the problems of load-capacity by VTOL in my mind.

Norbert

Offline Steve Blazo

  • The man likes white plastic...weird.
    • flickr
Re: Soviet Submersible Aircraft Carrier project 344 1/350
« Reply #21 on: March 08, 2015, 01:44:44 AM »
Cool concept, nicely done.
As I walk through the valley of death,
I have no fear, because I am the meanest mother*ucker in the whole valley.
- Gen. George S. Patton