Author Topic: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster  (Read 5680 times)

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« on: March 21, 2019, 08:49:55 AM »
The Curse of the Cargomaster

Readied to transport the first U.S. ICBMs, the Douglas C-133 had a peculiar habit. It kept crashing.

Read more at https://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/the-curse-of-the-cargomaster-2241392/#YCB1o0Y5MxcrWfCp.99

Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline Jeffry Fontaine

  • Unaffiliated Independent Subversive...and the last person to go for a trip on a Mexicana dH Comet 4
  • Global Moderator
  • His stash is able to be seen from space...
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2019, 11:19:25 AM »
The C-133 was a regular visitor to NAS Adak in the Aleutian islands when I lived there.  It never parked at the passenger and cargo air terminal.  It landed then taxied to the end of the runway and parked with the aft end facing the tundra and the small access road that led from there to the nuclear weapons storage area located a few hundred yards from the end of the runway.  Visits were short and with packages delivered and others loaded it would then start engines and taxi out to take off until the next visit.  C-133 was probably the largest aircraft to visit NAS Adak in the time I was there.  We had the occasional C-124, C-130, C-141, and on one occasions a pair of B-57B (very dark blue overall, may have been part of the Patricia Lynn program).  Also had an AC-119 make an unscheduled visit due to maintenance issues en route to or from SEA.
"Every day we hear about new studies 'revealing' what should have been obvious to sentient beings for generations; 'Research shows wolverines don't like to be teased" -- Jonah Goldberg

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2019, 12:03:31 PM »
What the USAF had to settle for when the C-132 was cancelled.

Offline Old Wombat

  • "We'll see when I've finished whether I'm showing off or simply embarrassing myself."
  • "Define 'interesting'?"
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2019, 12:30:12 PM »
Despite being built by Douglas, the C-133 looks a lot like an overgrown Lockheed C-130. ???

Now, if it had been slightly more reliable, an AC-133 would be one mother of a gunship! ;)
"This is the Captain. We have a little problem with our engine sequence, so we may experience some slight turbulence and, ah, explode."

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2019, 09:16:43 PM »
What the USAF had to settle for when the C-132 was cancelled.

Do you think the C-132 would have been any better Evan ?

I'll have to get going on the 1/72 kit I have of the C-133, which is about the same size as the Short Belfast BTW

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2019, 02:02:17 AM »
I'll have to get going on the 1/72 kit I have of the C-133, which is about the same size as the Short Belfast BTW

Which kit is that?
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2019, 05:19:58 AM »
I'll have to get going on the 1/72 kit I have of the C-133, which is about the same size as the Short Belfast BTW

Which kit is that?

Gene Hooker kit. I then got some detail resin from J Rutman for it. Only J Rutman doesn't do all the 1/72 resin he used to do anymore.

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2019, 01:41:09 AM »
Ok - wasn't sure if it was that one or the Annigrand one.

Re ideas, for some reason, I can see a jet version with Pratt & Whitney TF33s from a C-141 being done.

« Last Edit: March 23, 2019, 01:46:23 AM by GTX_Admin »
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2019, 01:47:13 AM »
Also what about some alternate operators:

  • RAF instead of  Short Belfast C.1s
  • Civilian heavy lift
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline Kerick

  • Reportedly finished with a stripper...
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2019, 02:11:32 AM »
I saw one of these at the museum at Dover AFB. What a monster! IIRC the C-133 did not have the strengthened floor like the C-141, C-130 or C-5 so it couldn’t carry tanks and such. Otherwise it might have soldiered on longer.

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #10 on: March 23, 2019, 02:38:27 AM »
I wonder how one would go taking the wing, engines and empennage from a C-133 and mating it up with a new fuselage (say a DC-8) to create a new turboprop airliner or even maritime patrol aircraft?
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline Kerick

  • Reportedly finished with a stripper...
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2019, 02:50:10 AM »
Maybe a fuselage stretch to match the wingspan?

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #12 on: March 23, 2019, 02:54:22 AM »
Maybe a fuselage stretch to match the wingspan?

Of a standard C-133? 
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #13 on: March 23, 2019, 03:38:11 AM »
Ok - wasn't sure if it was that one or the Annigrand one.

Re ideas, for some reason, I can see a jet version with Pratt & Whitney TF33s from a C-141 being done.

There is the Combat Models one too ----

The Belfast was proposed to have a C-141 wing with RR engines, it could have gone on the C-133 too I think
« Last Edit: March 23, 2019, 03:40:24 AM by kitnut617 »

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #14 on: March 23, 2019, 03:49:16 AM »
I was actually thinking of keeping the wing but just adding the TF33 Nacelles/pylons.
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2019, 03:58:29 AM »
I was actually thinking of keeping the wing but just adding the TF33 Nacelles/pylons.

Ah OK, like a Chase XC-123 then
« Last Edit: March 23, 2019, 04:00:25 AM by kitnut617 »

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2019, 04:00:20 AM »
Yes, though with single engines per pod
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline Rickshaw

  • "Of course, I could be talking out of my hat"
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #17 on: March 23, 2019, 10:24:29 AM »
I saw one of these at the museum at Dover AFB. What a monster! IIRC the C-133 did not have the strengthened floor like the C-141, C-130 or C-5 so it couldn’t carry tanks and such. Otherwise it might have soldiered on longer.

It could carry light armoured vehicles.  In 1965, the USAF carried M41 light tanks for the ARVN from Saigon to Da Nang to put down a rebellion headed by the "Third Force" (primarily Buddhist followers) which wanted to negotiate with the NLF (Communist) forces.   Apparently it was fairly hairy but it was accomplished.  The sudden arrival of tanks, even if only light tanks was enough to stop the rebellion in it's tracks (pun intended).

Online finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #18 on: March 24, 2019, 02:22:23 AM »
When I was in Anchorage Alaska early '70s saw one fly over low.  Impressive.

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #19 on: April 20, 2021, 07:53:51 PM »
Via Facebook.

Text translated from French.

Study of a container installed on the Douglas C-133 Cargomaster for the transport of heavy loads (in particular Saturn rockets). Ultimately, the decision was made to install petal-type doors on the back so that the opening was large enough to insert the Atlas, Titan, and Minuteman missiles. As for the large elements of the Saturn V rocket, transport will be provided by the Super Guppies of Aero Spacelines.

Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline M.A.D

  • Also likes a bit of arse...
  • Wrote a great story about a Christmas Air Battle
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #20 on: April 22, 2021, 10:57:04 AM »
What the USAF had to settle for when the C-132 was cancelled.

Good point, and I agree.

MAD

Offline M.A.D

  • Also likes a bit of arse...
  • Wrote a great story about a Christmas Air Battle
Re: Douglas C-133 Cargomaster
« Reply #21 on: April 22, 2021, 10:58:51 AM »
Via Facebook.

Text translated from French.

Study of a container installed on the Douglas C-133 Cargomaster for the transport of heavy loads (in particular Saturn rockets). Ultimately, the decision was made to install petal-type doors on the back so that the opening was large enough to insert the Atlas, Titan, and Minuteman missiles. As for the large elements of the Saturn V rocket, transport will be provided by the Super Guppies of Aero Spacelines.



Now that's an awesome model 😯

MAD