Author Topic: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...  (Read 4071 times)


Offline ysi_maniac

  • I will die understanding not this world
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2018, 10:31:57 AM »

What if P-66 evolved into a serious Fighter?

Lets begin with Corsair fuselage and Zero wings and tail plane.





Maroon parts would need some scratch or further research. This way we get a Vanguard on steroids with a very powerful engine.

Offline Logan Hartke

  • High priest in the black arts of profiling...
  • Rivet-counting whiffer
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2018, 12:14:45 PM »
That would be a great kitbash!

Cheers,

Logan

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2018, 12:36:20 PM »
P-64 with a R2600 or R2800 in the nose; might need the tail moved aft for weight and balance purposes.  Perhaps fit a derivative of a Mustang wing?

Offline ysi_maniac

  • I will die understanding not this world
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2018, 08:12:33 AM »
... and, what if a more advanced wing, than that of Zero, for Super Vanguard?



... Yes. It is suggested by Evan's comment a propos P-64.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2018, 10:03:46 AM by ysi_maniac »

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2018, 02:35:27 AM »
I do have one of these in the stash - was planning to do either as Swedish (they did order after all), or as Royal Netherlands East Indies Army Air Force or Australian.

All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline ysi_maniac

  • I will die understanding not this world
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2020, 03:28:43 PM »
Alternative to P-64


Offline robunos

  • Can't afford the top wing of his biplanes...
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #7 on: May 19, 2020, 10:20:13 PM »
... and, what if a more advanced wing, than that of Zero, for Super Vanguard?



... Yes. It is suggested by Evan's comment a propos P-64.



How about this ?


http://voughtworks.blogspot.com/2013/12/f4u-low-drag-wing-study.html


cheers,
Robin.
By the pricking of my thumbs, Something Whiff-y this way comes . . .

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Online Jeffry Fontaine

  • Unaffiliated Independent Subversive...and the last person to go for a trip on a Mexicana dH Comet 4
  • Global Moderator
  • His stash is able to be seen from space...
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2020, 04:00:07 AM »
The wings in that shared link look very similar to those of the F6F Hellcat.  Might be a good starting point for such a what-if.
"Every day we hear about new studies 'revealing' what should have been obvious to sentient beings for generations; 'Research shows wolverines don't like to be teased" -- Jonah Goldberg

Offline M.A.D

  • Also likes a bit of arse...
  • Wrote a great story about a Christmas Air Battle
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #10 on: May 24, 2020, 08:02:34 AM »
I understand and appreciate that the RAAF received and operated the Vultee P-66 Vanguard, but this wasn't until 1942, if my memory serves me correctly.
So, how about this as a scenario...not happy with the Brewster Buffalo pathetic performance, the RAAF rejects the British offer of this obvious second-rate fighter and instead opts for the Vultee V-48C Vanguard, which itself was being developed for Sweden. The Australian government concludes an emergency order with Vultee, if and only if they can expedite their delivery to Australia, to which Vultee is more than willing and able to do, with the notion that other air forces would follow Australia's lead.
The RAAF impressed enough with the Vanguard, coordinates with the Australian government to have Australian War Supplies Procurement office in Washington for the Licensed production of an improved Vanguard
Hence Australia negates the need and urgency of the CAC CA-12 Boomerang.....

M.A.D

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #11 on: May 25, 2020, 03:00:58 AM »
I understand and appreciate that the RAAF received and operated the Vultee P-66 Vanguard, but this wasn't until 1942, if my memory serves me correctly.


Not quite - see here
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline M.A.D

  • Also likes a bit of arse...
  • Wrote a great story about a Christmas Air Battle
Re: WWII US minor fighters: P-64, P-66, ...
« Reply #12 on: May 25, 2020, 05:07:10 AM »
I understand and appreciate that the RAAF received and operated the Vultee P-66 Vanguard, but this wasn't until 1942, if my memory serves me correctly.


Not quite - see here


Thanks for the clarification GTX
Still I like the notion 😉

MAD