Author Topic: DH 82 Tiger Moth ...  (Read 12056 times)

Offline jcf

  • Global Moderator
  • Turn that Gila-copter down!
Re: DH 82 Tiger Moth ...
« Reply #25 on: November 01, 2014, 01:31:15 PM »
... and the thermojets as used in the Campini-Caproni, Mig and Sukhoi aircraft
used a multistage compressor with burner cans mounted behind the driving
engine and exhausting straight through. None of which were features of Coanda's
design. Take a close look at the info out there and Coanda's patents, particularly
the ones that were modified after the fact, and you'll see his design had no hope
in hell of working, and that his claims of flight, made decades after the supposed
event and unsupported in records of the period, were just that, claims without
evidence. The physics don't work.
“Conspiracy theory’s got to be simple.
Sense doesn’t come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated shit
actually is than they ever are about
whatever’s supposed to be behind the
conspiracy.”
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: DH 82 Tiger Moth ...
« Reply #26 on: November 02, 2014, 03:54:05 AM »
Scale the fan up to adequate size for a real aircraft and you start running into problems at that RPM, like sonic tip speeds and all the problems from that.

Yes, unfortunately as all too many have found out, some things don't scale well (e.g. XVF-12).  This is part of the reason that real engineering uses measures such as Reynolds numbers and the like - these give better representations than simply linear dimensional scaling.
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline Silver Fox

  • Talk to me Goose!
Re: DH 82 Tiger Moth ...
« Reply #27 on: November 02, 2014, 05:57:22 AM »
I wonder if you could use a matrix of smaller fans? Say one large fan to feed a number of lower diameter ones that avoid the inherent problems?

Engineering nightmare, and I'm not sure what advantages it might offer... but if you were insane enough?

Offline Silver Fox

  • Talk to me Goose!
Re: DH 82 Tiger Moth ...
« Reply #28 on: November 02, 2014, 06:04:38 AM »
Yes, unfortunately as all too many have found out, some things don't scale well (e.g. XVF-12).  This is part of the reason that real engineering uses measures such as Reynolds numbers and the like - these give better representations than simply linear dimensional scaling.

The best scale for testing has always been 12"=1'. :)

I always run into this issue with my model ships. Water doesn't scale, so how do you make a destroyer look like it has that typical "bone in it's teeth" at high speed? So far, nothing I've seen tried has ever worked.