Author Topic: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft  (Read 164211 times)

Offline Doom!

  • Slayer of pixels and plastic!
  • Glad to be here!
    • Doom Island 2
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #150 on: September 12, 2012, 11:09:38 PM »
Stephane, I honestly didn't see the previous 4 until you mentioned them, being as how they were on a separate page. I enjoy your work quite a bit but don't always get a chance to comment.
Doom!
Jeff G.

Offline Dr. YoKai

  • Was in High School when mastadons roamed the plains...
  • A notorious curmudgeon who is partial to...hemp!
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #151 on: September 14, 2012, 01:45:17 AM »
 Your work continues to amaze, Stephane-I'm not a big fan of the Mustang, but the twin variation
 you recently did is really striking.

Offline finsrin

  • The Dr Frankenstein of the modelling world...when not hiding from SBA
  • Finds part glues it on, finds part glues it on....
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #152 on: September 14, 2012, 12:08:31 PM »
A-51:  brilliant work, so real looking, love it    :-*

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #153 on: September 17, 2012, 09:28:47 AM »
Recent works for your enjoyment (hopefully...):










The first of these looks so natural and quite aesthetically pleasing.  As to the second, are we really ready for a "stealth airliner"?  That greatly resembles a scaled-up Tacit Blue with a few tweaks for more conventional appearances.

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #154 on: September 17, 2012, 09:35:13 AM »



[/quote]

The first of these looks so natural and quite aesthetically pleasing.  As to the second, are we really ready for a "stealth airliner"?  That greatly resembles a scaled-up Tacit Blue with a few tweaks for more conventional appearances.
[/quote]

Given the nose shape, a Shamu paint scheme would seem appropriate.   ;D
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #155 on: September 17, 2012, 09:35:32 AM »
are we really ready for a "stealth airliner"?  That greatly resembles a scaled-up Tacit Blue with a few tweaks for more conventional appearances.

Actually not. It's the Teledyne Ryan BQM-145A UAV (see attachments in related post for original photo).

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #156 on: September 17, 2012, 10:11:46 AM »
are we really ready for a "stealth airliner"?  That greatly resembles a scaled-up Tacit Blue with a few tweaks for more conventional appearances.

Actually not. It's the Teledyne Ryan BQM-145A UAV (see attachments in related post for original photo).
Hmm, convergent concepts.  A lot of it does look like Tacit Blue.  I wonder if it was something in the water in SoCal during that time?

Offline apophenia

  • Perversely enjoys removing backgrounds.
  • Patterns? What patterns?
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #157 on: September 19, 2012, 05:12:07 AM »
Stéphane: I haven't been around for a while but I love your Arsenal VB.210! I'm a sucker for most things Arsenal but a twin VB.10 is pure genius.

The RW has just fallen short in providing us with enough  four-engined fighter aircraft!
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #158 on: September 30, 2012, 03:16:53 AM »
As usual, I'm grateful for all your comments, folks!

Haven't got round to doing the A-51 three-view, but I definitely will. Meanwhile, here's a project I started a few months ago and forgot about...

The Lockheed XO-3D « Sirius » was an experimental development of the YO-3A « Quiet Star » with two staggered wings connected at the tips, enlarged rudder, and three-place cockpit...



Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #159 on: September 30, 2012, 08:55:49 AM »
Finally, the 4-view plan of the North American A-51 Stallion is here. Took me a while but I think it was worth it, especially since many of you seem to have enjoyed in photo-edition form.

This should serve as a good base for those who are tempted to model it in plastic.

Please note that:
  • The nose gear is adaptated from a P-38 Lightning.
  • The main gear was modified a bit, with the wheel moved slightly back.
  • Tail wheel was removed.
  • Nose is custom, though inspired in profile view by that of the Martin XB-51.

Feel free if you have any questions, remarks or even positive criticism!

Full-size download (1883 x 1366 pixels) is available by clicking here.


Offline dy031101

  • Yuri Fanboy and making cute stuff practical- at least that's the plan anyway
  • Prefers Guns And Tanks Over Swords And Magic
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #160 on: September 30, 2012, 08:57:05 AM »
Oh Hell Yeah!  :)
Forget about his bow and arrows- why wait until that sparrow has done his deed when I can just bury him right now 'cause I'm sick and tired of hearing why he wants to have his way with the cock robin!?

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #161 on: September 30, 2012, 09:12:30 AM »
Luv it. Maybe the fate of one my stashed F-82s.  :)

The nose looks like it could be build from the proboscises of a P-38 and P-80.

Did you bend in the wing tips?
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #162 on: September 30, 2012, 09:58:11 AM »
Did you bend in the wing tips?

I didn't actually. But since I used elements from the P-82B and others from the P-82E, it just so happens that the wings are from the latter, and shaped differently... Consider this the "A-51" production version instead of the YA-51 of the photo...  ;)

Offline Logan Hartke

  • High priest in the black arts of profiling...
  • Rivet-counting whiffer
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #163 on: September 30, 2012, 09:59:19 AM »
Gorgeous 3 view of the Stallion!

Cheers,

Logan

Offline apophenia

  • Perversely enjoys removing backgrounds.
  • Patterns? What patterns?
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #164 on: October 01, 2012, 10:34:48 AM »
That tandem-wing Quiet Star is inspired!  :)
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft: Pilatus J-1 « Drachen »
« Reply #165 on: October 01, 2012, 05:39:47 PM »
Thanks a lot, folks! Glad you've enjoyed the Stallion plan!

And now the Pilatus J-1 Drachen, a Swiss jet fighter from the post-war years.



Can you found out what aircraft I used as a basis?

Offline tsrjoe

  • Has been volunteered... for something...
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #166 on: October 01, 2012, 06:31:53 PM »
really sweet, first time iv seen a derived 'operational' Boulton paul P.111/120  8) funny it does look like something the Swiss would have designed in the late 50's prior to the Arbalete, Aguilon, etc

i just love that NA. Stallion, just wondering who will be first to reproduce it in plastic  :D

cherrs, Joe

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #167 on: October 01, 2012, 06:38:55 PM »
really sweet, first time iv seen a derived 'operational' Boulton paul P.111/120  8)

Good guess! Though I stretched it quite a bit...

funny it does look like something the Swiss would have designed in the late 50's prior to the Arbalete, Aguilon, etc

Thanks, I really take it as a compliment.

i just love that NA. Stallion, just wondering who will be first to reproduce it in plastic  :D

Can't wait to see someone do THAT!!!  :))

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #168 on: October 02, 2012, 12:13:50 AM »
Interesting dragon, while I prefer sharp noses (would you do a version with lateral intakes?)

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #169 on: October 02, 2012, 04:30:19 AM »
Tophe, that would be the J-2 I guess... I might give it a go...

Meanwhile, here is a special how-to that not only shows you what aircraft I used as a basis, but also how easy it is to completely change an aircraft's change with minimum effort (well, sometimes at least!).

Hope you enjoy it!


Offline tsrjoe

  • Has been volunteered... for something...
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #170 on: October 02, 2012, 06:20:40 AM »
waw im in awe, having tried tweaking an image pixel by pixel im truly impressed at the talents of those that make it 'look' easy (as i know its a lot harder than it looks !)  8)

cheers, Joe

Offline apophenia

  • Perversely enjoys removing backgrounds.
  • Patterns? What patterns?
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #171 on: October 02, 2012, 07:52:23 AM »
Ack! He's giving away the trade secrets  :o

Nice job on the step-by-step Stéphane  :)
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #172 on: October 02, 2012, 11:50:14 AM »
Tophe, that would be the J-2 I guess... I might give it a go...
This is not a requirement. Just in case you run out of ideas... someday.
For the step by step lesson, I am amazed, how do you elongate/lengthen a fuselage without turning blurred?

Stargazer2006

  • Guest
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #173 on: October 02, 2012, 04:11:46 PM »
how do you elongate/lengthen a fuselage without turning blurred?

When you resize an picture in Paint Shop Pro (and I believe in other software too) there is a choice between bilinear, bicubic or intelligent resize. Intelligent resize is best, it smoothens the contours and gives a more natural feel. When it's done, you can apply the "sharpen" filter to make the picture, well... sharper.

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: Stargazer2006's imaginary aircraft
« Reply #174 on: October 02, 2012, 11:52:20 PM »
Thanks for the explanation! Corel Paint Shop Pro seems to have turned better than my Corel Photo Paint 6...