Author Topic: 1946 Mustang & Lightning  (Read 784 times)

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: 1946 Mustang & Lightning
« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2018, 02:42:36 AM »
Thanks!

And Robomog at http://beyondthesprues.com/Forum/index.php?topic=7735.0 presented a great Mustang with jets Under the wings. With minimal changes, while I prefer to change into a twin-boom layout ??? :-\ :D

Offline Robomog

  • Would you buy a used kit from this man?
Re: 1946 Mustang & Lightning
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2018, 05:43:10 AM »
Hey Tophe, thanks for the shout out,  this looks  good but It would need a donor aircraft or two for the booms (similar dilemma for the rocket B29) ???

Keep up the good work  ;)

Mog
>^-.-^<

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: 1946 Mustang & Lightning
« Reply #17 on: March 22, 2018, 01:21:51 AM »
Thanks!
And... facing the He-162 in 1945, the P-51D seemed outdated, the P-51H seemed not better enough, so a P-5162 was designed, first flight in 1946:

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: 1946 Mustang & Lightning
« Reply #18 on: March 23, 2018, 12:43:31 PM »
The P-5162 suffered from short range and poor safety, like the He-162, but the (twinboom :-* ) P-5163 cured that:

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: 1946 Mustang & Lightning
« Reply #19 on: March 23, 2018, 05:22:12 PM »
And Robomog at http://beyondthesprues.com/Forum/index.php?topic=7735.0 presented a great Mustang with jets Under the wings. With minimal changes, while I prefer to
On drawing, changes are more easy: Meteor-like wing/engines, T-tail, short nose + 3-engined twin-seat long-range version:

Offline Tophe

  • He sees things in double...
  • twin-boom & asymmetric fan
    • my models
Re: 1946 Mustang & Lightning
« Reply #20 on: March 26, 2018, 02:19:42 AM »
The regular Twin-Mustang with 3 turbojets was this one: