Author Topic: McDonnell Douglas 220  (Read 6417 times)

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
McDonnell Douglas 220
« on: November 24, 2013, 09:00:39 PM »
Stumble across this competitor to the Lockheed Jetstar. Very sharp looking. Many more images on the 'net. And it is for sale.





Wikipedia Page

Airliners.net page

Sources: JetPhotos.net, Boeing
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline PR19_Kit

  • Likes to brag about how long his...wings are.
  • Made it at last!
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2013, 11:36:58 PM »
A cracking looking aeroplane, the 220! I think they only built one, didn't they?

Yonks ago Sasquatch did a 1/144 resin kit of it I recall but I've never seen one built.
Regards
Kit

--------------------------
Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2013, 11:47:06 PM »
A cracking looking aeroplane, the 220! I think they only built one, didn't they?

Yonks ago Sasquatch did a 1/144 resin kit of it I recall but I've never seen one built.

Yes, only one was built. I'll like to build one but it take some thought as to what the best donor pieces are.  Some line diagrams would be a great starting point.
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2013, 12:06:35 AM »
A cracking looking aeroplane, the 220! I think they only built one, didn't they?

Yonks ago Sasquatch did a 1/144 resin kit of it I recall but I've never seen one built.


Yes, only one was built. I'll like to build one but it take some thought as to what the best donor pieces are.  Some line diagrams would be a great starting point.


Belay that order. Found one: Aviastar.org
« Last Edit: November 25, 2013, 12:32:44 AM by The Big Gimper »
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline GTX_Admin

  • Evil Administrator bent on taking over the Universe!
  • Administrator - Yep, I'm the one to blame for this place.
  • Whiffing Demi-God!
    • Beyond the Sprues
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2013, 02:12:54 AM »
Would look good in Air Force One scheme.
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

You can't outrun Death forever.
But you can make the Bastard work for it.

Offline upnorth

  • Distorting a reality near you.
  • You want maple syrup on that Macchi?
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2013, 02:36:59 AM »
Plenty cool looking design, but a FOD magnet to be sure with four engines slung so low.
Pickled Wings, A Blog for Preserved Aircraft:
http://pickledwings.com/

Beyond Prague, Traveling the Rest of the Czech Republic:
http://beyondprague.net/

Offline Daryl J.

  • Assures us he rarely uses model glue in dentistry
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2013, 03:54:55 AM »
 Engines by Vitamix.
No worries.
For the non-Americans, Vitamix is a high quality food blender for the kitchen.....
kwyxdxLg5T

Offline elmayerle

  • Its about time there was an Avatar shown here...
  • Über Engineer...at least that is what he tells us.
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2013, 04:24:45 AM »
Swap them around, mount the engines above the wing like Hondajet does.

Offline ysi_maniac

  • I will die understanding not this world
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #8 on: November 25, 2013, 06:16:25 AM »
In order to produce something close to this, I would start with Airfix Dominie 1/72 ...



Wings and tail plane from a 707 at 1/144
How about reenginig with J85?
...
« Last Edit: November 25, 2013, 06:20:38 AM by ysi_maniac »

Offline Jeffry Fontaine

  • Unaffiliated Independent Subversive...and the last person to go for a trip on a Mexicana dH Comet 4
  • Global Moderator
  • His stash is able to be seen from space...
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #9 on: November 25, 2013, 07:03:45 AM »
Yes, only one was built. I'll like to build one but it take some thought as to what the best donor pieces are.  Some line diagrams would be a great starting point.

The quartet of podded jet engines from the Italeri AC-119 kits you got from me a while back should be useful for making this project happen Carl. ;)
"Every day we hear about new studies 'revealing' what should have been obvious to sentient beings for generations; 'Research shows wolverines don't like to be teased" -- Jonah Goldberg

Offline PR19_Kit

  • Likes to brag about how long his...wings are.
  • Made it at last!
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #10 on: November 25, 2013, 07:18:29 AM »
The 220's engine pods are rectangular for some reason. Looks neat but it'd need some work to make them from normal round ones.
Regards
Kit

--------------------------
Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings

Offline kitnut617

  • Measures the actual aircraft before modelling it...we have the photographic evidence.
  • Holding Pattern
  • *
  • I'd rather be dirtbike riding...
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #11 on: November 25, 2013, 07:41:39 AM »
They look like the engine pods from a Neptune or C-123 --

Offline The Big Gimper

  • Any model will look better in RCAF, SEAC or FAA markings
  • Global Moderator
  • Cut. Cut. Cut. Measure. Cut. Cut. Crap. Toss.
    • Photobucket Modeling Album
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #12 on: November 25, 2013, 07:57:03 AM »
Yes, only one was built. I'll like to build one but it take some thought as to what the best donor pieces are.  Some line diagrams would be a great starting point.

The quartet of podded jet engines from the Italeri AC-119 kits you got from me a while back should be useful for making this project happen Carl. ;)

Jeff: I have already set those aside as well as a Dominie for this build. Looking for 1/144 707 or DC-8 wings. 
Work in progress ::

I am giving up listing them. They all end up on the shelf of procrastination anyways.

User and abuser of Bothans...

Offline upnorth

  • Distorting a reality near you.
  • You want maple syrup on that Macchi?
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #13 on: November 25, 2013, 02:33:21 PM »
They look like the engine pods from a Neptune or C-123 --

They reminded me a bit of B-66 engines.
Pickled Wings, A Blog for Preserved Aircraft:
http://pickledwings.com/

Beyond Prague, Traveling the Rest of the Czech Republic:
http://beyondprague.net/

capttom

  • Guest
Re: McDonnell Douglas 220
« Reply #14 on: November 28, 2013, 04:43:19 AM »
From what I've read, the engine pods were squared off to help prevent foreign object ingestion. The plane was at the El Paso International Airport and is clearly visible outside a hangar on Google or Bing satellite map photos. Maybe the jet's still there.