Old Wombat,
Thank you for calrifying that for me.
Lately, I have gotten a little off track, trhying to figure out how a vehicle like this will drive either its tracks or its waterjets (when in water).
In looking at information on the canceled EFV program it looks like they used a regular gearbox driving the final drives to the track, but added in some sort of "splitter gear" between the engine and the gearbox that could be used to clutch in the waterjets and clutch out the main gearbox (if I am understanding correctly) as shown in the following links
http://www.army-guide.com/eng/product2418.htmlhttps://www.fire.tc.faa.gov/2007conference/files/Materials_Fire_Safety/WedAM/GwynneMagnesium/GwynneMagnesiumPres.pdfAnd data on the Korean KAAV II "appear" to show a similar configuration, if I am understanding the images that I have seen.
https://blog.naver.com/jhst3103/221397823921Alternately, I also came across a paper on the US Government's Public STINET site about a "test rig" that was built early in the AAAV/EFV program (I think) that was built to valaidate the ability to retract a vehicles suspension and shift from a "land based" propulsion, to a "seaborne/waterjet" propulsion. And in that design it appears that the main engine there directly drove two hydraulic pumps which could either drive a hydraulic motor on each final drve or a hydraulic motor on each waterjet, depending if you were operating on land or water.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA205397.pdfCurrently I do not know whch type of set up might be best for a combat vehicle, or if may be some mix of systems might be better. But for now since I kind of used the M8 AGS as a starting point for my dimensioning I figured that I shouel maybe enlarge the vehicle a bit to account for th extra volume that would be required for a pair of waterjets and this added "splitter" gearbox or hydraulic pumps and motors.
Also, from my reading it looks like many of these type craft will use air cooling for the engine when operating on land, but will have an auxiliary water cooling system for seaborne operations. I'm guessing that maybe this arrangment may also help with cutting down on the concerns on injesting sea water and spray through the air cooling system whan the vehicle is at sea.
Below is a CAD sketch showing some 300mm diameter waterjets placed aft and the main engine (an MTU 6V 890) and a notional main gearbox (a RENK HSWL 194) located forward. [I really have only used this specific gearbox for now since it seems more or less matched to the engine size I've picked and I was able to find numerous 3D models of it on the internet, and figured that any other gearbox with similar capabilities would hopefully be similarly sized.]
A couple bg concerns right now is just how tight it looks inside (especially in way of the driver and the adjacent gearbos and engine) as well as how big the turret ring is for the turret that I have picked, and the fact that I would need to find someway of getting the "power" from the engine forward to the waterjets aft, without the turret basket getting in the way. As such maybe a fuly hydraulic transmission system, or a partial one where a hydraulic pump is only used to drive the waterjets, but the final drives for the tracks are still driven by a mecanical gearbox may be an option.
Anyway, I'm trying not to get too far down in the weeds (since my knowledge of all this stuff isn't that great) but I do want to at least try and make an effort so that I can kind of say that I "think" that there may be enough space to do this, and its kind of interesting to me, and a learning experience, to research and look through how other "real" vehicles tried to do similar things. And from what I am currently seeing, I'm beginning to think that I probably need to make my vehicle a little bit bigger to fit everything it will probably need.
Pat